Is the Family Size of Parents and Children Still Related? Revisiting the Cross-Generational Relationship Over the Last Century.
Children
Family size
Fertility
Gender
Intergenerational transmission
Parents
Journal
Demography
ISSN: 1533-7790
Titre abrégé: Demography
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0226703
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
15
3
2019
medline:
13
2
2020
entrez:
15
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In most developed countries, the fertility levels of parents and children are positively correlated. This article analyzes the strength of the intergenerational transmission of family size over the last century, including a focus on this reproduction in large and small families. Using the large-scale French Family Survey (2011), we show a weak but significant correlation of approximately 0.12-0.15, which is comparable with levels in other Western countries. It is stronger for women than men, with a gender convergence across cohorts. A decrease in intergenerational transmission is observed across birth cohorts regardless of whether socioeconomic factors are controlled, supporting the idea that the family of origin has lost implicit and explicit influence on fertility choices. As parents were adopting the two-child family norm, the number of siblings lost its importance for having two children, but it continues to explain lower parity and, above all, three-child families. This suggests that the third child has increasingly become an "extra child" (beyond the norm) favored by people from large families.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30868472
doi: 10.1007/s13524-019-00767-5
pii: 10.1007/s13524-019-00767-5
pmc: PMC6449311
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
595-619Références
Eur J Popul. 2016;32(4):475-510
pubmed: 27795600
Science. 1989 Jul 7;245(4913):32-6
pubmed: 2740913
Econ Stat. 1979 Nov;(116):3-11
pubmed: 12336319
Demography. 1996 Feb;33(1):66-81
pubmed: 8690141
Hum Reprod. 2012 Apr;27(4):1179-83
pubmed: 22258662
Hist Fam. 2013 Jan 1;18(2):135-153
pubmed: 24436631
Demography. 2015 Jun;52(3):811-33
pubmed: 26012844
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Apr;155:82-92
pubmed: 26994961
Popul Bull. 1987 Mar;42(1):1-59
pubmed: 12268395
Annu Rev Sociol. 1985;11:305-28
pubmed: 12313951
Demography. 2012 Feb;49(1):101-24
pubmed: 22203451
Demography. 1994 Feb;31(1):65-79
pubmed: 8005343
J Interdiscip Hist. 2012;42(4):543-69
pubmed: 22530253
Demography. 2019 Apr;56(2):595-619
pubmed: 30868472
Kolner Z Soz Sozpsychol. 2015;67(Suppl 1):397-424
pubmed: 26412877
Demography. 1993 Aug;30(3):385-404
pubmed: 8405605
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2005 Nov;53 Spec No 2:2S3-11
pubmed: 16471140
Soc Biol. 1999 Spring-Summer;46(1-2):122-45
pubmed: 10842505
Demography. 2017 Feb;54(1):23-44
pubmed: 28032264
Popul Stud (Camb). 2002 Nov;56(3):235-48
pubmed: 12553320
Biodemography Soc Biol. 2013;59(2):101-26
pubmed: 24215254
Popul Dev Rev. 2010;36(2):211-51
pubmed: 20734551
Adv Life Course Res. 2014 Sep;21:123-34
pubmed: 26047547
Adv Life Course Res. 2014 Sep;21:87-100
pubmed: 26047544
Int J Androl. 2006 Feb;29(1):46-53
pubmed: 16466523
Popul Stud (Camb). 2008 Mar;62(1):69-84
pubmed: 18278674
Demography. 1987 Nov;24(4):467-80
pubmed: 3322885
Popul Stud (Camb). 2017 Mar;71(1):43-63
pubmed: 28209084
Demography. 1992 May;29(2):265-85
pubmed: 1607052
Demography. 2014 Oct;51(5):1703-28
pubmed: 25145325
Demography. 2013 Aug;50(4):1399-420
pubmed: 23344794
Soc Biol. 2002 Fall-Winter;49(3-4):218-48
pubmed: 14652919
Econ Stat. 1985 Mar;(175):21-38, 81, 83
pubmed: 12267049
Eur J Popul. 2013 Feb;29(1):1-38
pubmed: 23440941