Inbreeding depression load for litter size in Entrepelado and Retinto Iberian pig varieties1.
Iberian pig
best linear unbiased prediction
identity-by-descent
inbreeding depression
total number born
Journal
Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Apr 2019
29 Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
19
10
2018
accepted:
12
03
2019
pubmed:
15
3
2019
medline:
29
8
2019
entrez:
15
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Individual-specific hidden inbreeding depression load (IDL) can be accounted for in livestock populations by appropriate best linear unbiased prediction approaches. This genetic effect has a recessive pattern and reveals when inherited in terms of identity-by-descent. Nevertheless, IDL inherits as a pure additive genetic background and can be selected using standard breeding values. The main target of this research was to evaluate IDL for litter size in 2 Iberian pig varieties (Entrepelado and Retinto) from a commercial breeding-stock. Analyses were performed on the total number of piglets born (both alive and dead) and used data from 3,200 (8.02 ± 0.04 piglets/litter) Entrepelado and 4,744 Retinto litters (8.40 ± 0.03 piglets/litter). Almost 50% of Entrepelado sows were inbred (1.7% to 25.0%), whereas this percentage reduced to 37.4% in the Retinto variety (0.2% to 25.0%). The analytical model was solved by Bayesian inference and accounted for 2 systematic effects (sow age and breed/variety of the artificial insemination boar), 2 permanent environmental effects (herd-year-season and sow), and 2 genetic effects (IDL and infinitesimal additive). In terms of posterior means (PM), additive genetic and IDL variances were similar in the Entrepelado variety (PM, 0.68 vs. 0.76 piglets2, respectively) and their 95% credibility intervals (95CI) overlapped, although without including zero (0.38 to 0.94 vs. 0.15 to 1.31 piglets2, respectively). The same pattern revealed in the Retinto variety, with IDL variance (PM, 0.41 piglets2; 95CI, 0.07 to 0.88 piglets2) slightly larger than the additive genetic variance (PM, 0.37 piglets2; 95CI, 0.16 to 0.59 piglets2). The relevance of IDL was also checked by a Bayes factor and the deviance information criterion, the model including this effect being clearly favored in both cases. Although the analysis assumed null genetic covariance between IDL and infinitesimal additive effects, a moderate negative correlation (-0.31) was suggested when plotting the PM of breeding values in the Entrepelado variety; a negative genetic trend for IDL was also revealed in this Iberian pig variety (-0.25 piglets for 100% inbred offspring of individuals born in 2014), whereas no trend was detected in Retinto breeding-stock. Those were the first estimates of IDL in a commercial livestock population, they giving evidence of a relevant genetic background with potential consequences on the reproductive performance of Iberian sows.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30869129
pii: 5380619
doi: 10.1093/jas/skz084
pmc: PMC6488320
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1979-1986Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
J Dairy Sci. 1994 Apr;77(4):1114-25
pubmed: 8201046
Anim Genet. 2014 Oct;45(5):618-28
pubmed: 24975026
Genet Res. 2000 Jun;75(3):331-43
pubmed: 10893869
Heredity (Edinb). 2011 Sep;107(3):256-64
pubmed: 21407255
Heredity (Edinb). 2007 Jul;99(1):81-8
pubmed: 17519972
Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Nov;10(11):783-96
pubmed: 19834483
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 31;8(10):e78314
pubmed: 24205195
J Anim Breed Genet. 2013 Aug;130(4):303-11
pubmed: 23855632
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Nov 17;47:89
pubmed: 26576649
J Anim Breed Genet. 2013 Oct;130(5):349-60
pubmed: 24074172
J Anim Breed Genet. 1993 Jan 12;110(1-6):93-104
pubmed: 21395707
J Anim Sci. 2002 Oct;80(10):2540-7
pubmed: 12413075
Anim Genet. 2000 Oct;31(5):295-301
pubmed: 11105208
Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Jan 26;50(1):1
pubmed: 29373954
J Anim Breed Genet. 2018 Feb;135(1):37-44
pubmed: 29230876
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Jan 17;47:1
pubmed: 25595431
Genet Res (Camb). 2008 Dec;90(6):499-508
pubmed: 19123968
Heredity (Edinb). 2004 Jul;93(1):104-13
pubmed: 15150539
Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Jan;64(1):225-31
pubmed: 9915962
J Anim Breed Genet. 2017 Jun;134(3):184-195
pubmed: 28508486
J Anim Sci. 2002 Sep;80(9):2267-75
pubmed: 12350004
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 8;106(36):15379-83
pubmed: 19717421
Animal. 2014 Oct;8(10):1569-76
pubmed: 25017969