The PACE trial of treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome: a response to WILSHIRE et al.
Chronic fatigue syndrome
Clinical trial
Cognitive behaviour therapy
Graded exercise therapy
Methodology
Journal
BMC psychology
ISSN: 2050-7283
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101627676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Mar 2019
12 Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
31
07
2018
accepted:
19
02
2019
entrez:
16
3
2019
pubmed:
16
3
2019
medline:
26
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) is chronic disabling illness characterized by severe disabling fatigue, typically made worse by exertion. Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) is thought by some to be the same disorder (then referred to as CFS/ME) and by others to be different. There is an urgent need to find effective treatments for CFS. The UK Medical Research Council PACE trial published in 2011 compared available treatments and concluded that when added to specialist medical care, cognitive behaviour therapy and graded exercise therapy were more effective in improving both fatigue and physical function in participants with CFS, than both adaptive pacing therapy and specialised medical care alone. In this paper, we respond to the methodological criticisms of the trial and a reanalysis of the trial data reported by Wilshire at al. We conclude that neither the criticisms nor the reanalysis offer any convincing reason to change the conclusions of the PACE trial.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30871632
doi: 10.1186/s40359-019-0288-x
pii: 10.1186/s40359-019-0288-x
pmc: PMC6419398
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : DRF-2011-04-061
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0200434
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD003200
pubmed: 15266475
BMC Neurol. 2007 Mar 08;7:6
pubmed: 17397525
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Jun;28(5):736-45
pubmed: 18060672
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD001027
pubmed: 18646067
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 20;28(26):3189-209
pubmed: 19455540
Lancet. 2011 Mar 5;377(9768):823-36
pubmed: 21334061
Psychol Med. 2013 Oct;43(10):2227-35
pubmed: 23363640
Trials. 2013 Nov 13;14:386
pubmed: 24225069
Qual Life Res. 2014 Nov;23(9):2407-16
pubmed: 24791749
Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;2(12):1067-74
pubmed: 26521770
J Psychosom Res. 2016 Aug;87:43-9
pubmed: 27411751
Intern Med J. 2016 Dec;46(12):1421-1429
pubmed: 27620986
J Psychosom Res. 2016 Nov;90:33-42
pubmed: 27772557
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 15;64(8):998-1005
pubmed: 28329131
Br J Health Psychol. 2017 Sep;22(3):383-413
pubmed: 28349621
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 25;4:CD003200
pubmed: 28444695
Lancet. 2017 Jul 22;390(10092):363-373
pubmed: 28648402
Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;212(2):112-118
pubmed: 29436329
BMC Psychol. 2018 Mar 22;6(1):6
pubmed: 29562932