Increases in statin eligibility to reduce cardiovascular risk according to the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines in the Africa Middle East region: a sub-analysis of the Africa Middle East Cardiovascular Epidemiological (ACE) study.
Adolescent
Adult
Africa
/ epidemiology
Age Factors
Aged
Biomarkers
/ blood
Cardiovascular Diseases
/ diagnosis
Cholesterol
/ blood
Cross-Sectional Studies
Dyslipidemias
/ blood
Eligibility Determination
/ standards
Female
Guideline Adherence
/ standards
Humans
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
Income
Male
Middle Aged
Middle East
/ epidemiology
Practice Guidelines as Topic
/ standards
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
/ standards
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Rural Health
/ standards
Sex Factors
Treatment Outcome
Urban Health
/ standards
Young Adult
Africa Middle East region
Cholesterol guidelines
Income
Lipid-lowering therapy
Statin therapy
The Africa and Middle East Cardiovascular Epidemiological (ACE) study
Journal
BMC cardiovascular disorders
ISSN: 1471-2261
Titre abrégé: BMC Cardiovasc Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968539
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 03 2019
15 03 2019
Historique:
received:
22
08
2018
accepted:
27
02
2019
entrez:
17
3
2019
pubmed:
17
3
2019
medline:
30
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
With development of cholesterol management guidelines by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA), more individuals at risk of cardiovascular disease may be eligible for statin therapy. It is not known how this affects statin eligibility in the Africa and Middle East Region. Data were used from the Africa Middle East Cardiovascular Epidemiological (ACE) study. The percentage of subjects eligible for statins per the ACC/AHA 2013 cholesterol guidelines and the 2002 National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP-ATP III) recommendations were compared. Analyses were carried out according to age, gender, community (urban/rural), and country income categories based on World Bank definitions. According to the ACC/AHA recommendations, 1695 out of 4378 subjects (39%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 37-40%) satisfied statin eligibility criteria vs. 1043/4378 (24%; 95% CI, 23-25%) per NCEP-ATP recommendations, representing a 63% increase in statin eligibility. Consistent increases in eligibility for statin therapy were seen according to the ACC/AHA vs. NCEP-ATP guidelines across sub-groups of age, gender, community, and country income. Notable increases for statin eligibility according to ACC/AHA vs. NCEP-ATP were seen, respectively, in subjects aged ≥65 years (86% vs. 39%), in males (46% vs. 25%), in low-income countries (28% vs. 14%), and rural communities (37% vs. 19%). An increase in statin eligibility was seen applying ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines compared with previous NCEP-ATP recommendations in the Africa Middle East region. The economic consequences of these guideline recommendations will need further research. The ACE trial is registered under NCT01243138 .
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
With development of cholesterol management guidelines by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA), more individuals at risk of cardiovascular disease may be eligible for statin therapy. It is not known how this affects statin eligibility in the Africa and Middle East Region.
METHODS
Data were used from the Africa Middle East Cardiovascular Epidemiological (ACE) study. The percentage of subjects eligible for statins per the ACC/AHA 2013 cholesterol guidelines and the 2002 National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP-ATP III) recommendations were compared. Analyses were carried out according to age, gender, community (urban/rural), and country income categories based on World Bank definitions.
RESULTS
According to the ACC/AHA recommendations, 1695 out of 4378 subjects (39%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 37-40%) satisfied statin eligibility criteria vs. 1043/4378 (24%; 95% CI, 23-25%) per NCEP-ATP recommendations, representing a 63% increase in statin eligibility. Consistent increases in eligibility for statin therapy were seen according to the ACC/AHA vs. NCEP-ATP guidelines across sub-groups of age, gender, community, and country income. Notable increases for statin eligibility according to ACC/AHA vs. NCEP-ATP were seen, respectively, in subjects aged ≥65 years (86% vs. 39%), in males (46% vs. 25%), in low-income countries (28% vs. 14%), and rural communities (37% vs. 19%).
CONCLUSION
An increase in statin eligibility was seen applying ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines compared with previous NCEP-ATP recommendations in the Africa Middle East region. The economic consequences of these guideline recommendations will need further research.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
The ACE trial is registered under NCT01243138 .
Identifiants
pubmed: 30876390
doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1034-2
pii: 10.1186/s12872-019-1034-2
pmc: PMC6420771
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
0
Cholesterol
97C5T2UQ7J
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01243138']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
61Références
Am Heart J. 2009 Jul;158(1):1-7.e1
pubmed: 19540385
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;(1):CD004816
pubmed: 23440795
N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 20;359(21):2195-207
pubmed: 18997196
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Apr;21(4):400-10
pubmed: 23125402
N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 10;355(6):549-59
pubmed: 16899775
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007 Sep;14 Suppl 2:S1-113
pubmed: 17726407
J Clin Lipidol. 2016 Jan-Feb;10(1):192-8.e1
pubmed: 26892136
Circulation. 2005 Dec 6;112(23):3554-61
pubmed: 16330696
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):2889-934
pubmed: 24239923
Lancet. 2003 Apr 5;361(9364):1149-58
pubmed: 12686036
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1:S62-9
pubmed: 20042775
JAMA. 2016 Nov 15;316(19):2008-2024
pubmed: 27838722
Ethn Dis. 2004 Spring;14(2):233-42
pubmed: 15132209
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Nov 12;15:172
pubmed: 25388219
Lancet. 2004 Aug 21-27;364(9435):685-96
pubmed: 15325833
N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 28;371(9):818-27
pubmed: 25162888
Lancet. 2010 Nov 13;376(9753):1670-81
pubmed: 21067804
Circulation. 2001 Nov 27;104(22):2746-53
pubmed: 11723030
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1333-41
pubmed: 25830423
Circulation. 2002 Dec 17;106(25):3143-421
pubmed: 12485966
N Engl J Med. 2005 Apr 7;352(14):1425-35
pubmed: 15755765
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 04;9(8):e102830
pubmed: 25090638
Am J Med. 2012 May;125(5):440-6
pubmed: 22387091
S Afr Med J. 2000 Feb;90(2 Pt 2):164-74, 176-8
pubmed: 10745972
Lancet. 2012 Aug 11;380(9841):581-90
pubmed: 22607822
Cardiol Ther. 2014 Dec;3(1-2):27-40
pubmed: 25403341
Lancet. 2016 Nov 19;388(10059):2532-2561
pubmed: 27616593
Lancet. 2002 Jul 6;360(9326):7-22
pubmed: 12114036