The "Auto-Constant": Can we estimate the Constant-Murley score with a self-administered questionnaire? A pilot study.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Shoulder
Surveys and Questionnaires
Journal
Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR
ISSN: 1877-0568
Titre abrégé: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101494830
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
received:
29
01
2018
revised:
19
11
2018
accepted:
28
11
2018
pubmed:
17
3
2019
medline:
3
3
2020
entrez:
17
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Constant score, allows an objective and subjective assessment of the shoulder function. It has been proven to have a poor interobserver reliability for some of its aspects and is not usable as a remote assessment tool. The Constant-Murley functional shoulder score can be assessed with a self-administered questionnaire. We conducted a prospective continuous study in a shoulder-specialized service. For each patient seen in consultation or hospitalized for a shoulder pathology, a self-administered questionnaire was delivered, and a clinical examination was performed by a surgeon. The questionnaire, in French language, was composed of checkboxes only, with pictures preferred over text for most items. Correlations with surgeon examination were assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficients, differences with the paired t-test. One hundred consecutive patients were analyzed. Correlation between the two scores was excellent (0.87), as were the range of motion and the pain subscores (0.85 and 0.78), good for the activity (0.69) and fair for the strength (0.57). The mean total score was 3 points lower for the self-administered questionnaire (CI95 [-5; -1]; p<0.01). Activity and pain were not significantly different (-0.4/20 and -0.3/40; p>0.05) but pain and force were slightly different (+0.8/15; -3.0/25; p<0.01). The Auto-Constant questionnaire in French is an excellent estimator of the Constant score, and of its pain and mobility sub-scores. It is less accurate for the evaluation of the strength, but differences between sub-scores compensate and allow its use in daily practice. II, Prospective continuous clinical series.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30876713
pii: S1877-0568(19)30039-8
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.11.023
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
251-256Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.