Changes in Immunosuppressive Treatment of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: Comparison of 2 Surveys within Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Centers in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.
Adenine
/ analogs & derivatives
Adult
Austria
/ epidemiology
Bronchiolitis Obliterans
/ epidemiology
Chronic Disease
Female
Germany
/ epidemiology
Graft vs Host Disease
/ epidemiology
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Humans
Immunosuppression Therapy
Male
Nitriles
Piperidines
Pyrazoles
/ administration & dosage
Pyrimidines
/ administration & dosage
Switzerland
/ epidemiology
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Bone marrow transplantation
Chronic graft-versus-host disease
Immunosuppressive therapy
Journal
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
ISSN: 1523-6536
Titre abrégé: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9600628
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
received:
09
01
2019
accepted:
04
03
2019
pubmed:
17
3
2019
medline:
2
7
2020
entrez:
17
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) remains the leading cause of late morbidity and mortality. Despite the growing number of treatment options in cGVHD, evidence remains sparse. The German-Austrian-Swiss GVHD Consortium performed a survey on clinical practice in treatment of cGVHD among transplant centers in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland in 2009 and 2018 and compared the results. The survey performed in 2009 contained 20 questions on first-line treatment and related issues and 4 questions on second-line scenarios followed by a survey on all systemic and topic treatment options known and applied, with 31 of 36 transplant centers (86%) responding. The survey in 2018 repeated 7 questions on first-line treatment and 3 questions on second-line scenarios followed by an updated survey on all current systemic treatment options known and applied, with 29 of 66 centers (43%) responding. In summary, the results show a large overlap of first-line treatment practice between centers and the 2 surveys because of a lack of new data that changes practice, except significant heterogeneity of treatment of cGVHD progressive onset type, which can be explained by the lack of trials focusing on this high-risk entity. In contrast, treatment options applied to second-line therapy vary considerably, with new agents like ibrutinib and ruxolitinib entering clinical practice. Moreover, treatment of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome demonstrates heterogeneity in applied therapeutic options and sequence because of a lack of controlled data and different conclusions from already existing evidence. In summary, the survey results demonstrate an increasing number of treatment options applied to cGVHD accompanied by a significant heterogeneity in second-line treatment and underline the urgent need for clinical trials and registry analyses on rare entities with high mortality like progressive onset type and lung involvement of cGVHD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30876928
pii: S1083-8791(19)30154-5
doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.03.003
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Nitriles
0
Piperidines
0
Pyrazoles
0
Pyrimidines
0
ibrutinib
1X70OSD4VX
ruxolitinib
82S8X8XX8H
Adenine
JAC85A2161
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1450-1455Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.