Time course of pain response and toxicity after whole-nerve-encompassing LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia-a prospective observational study.

Zeitverlauf von Schmerzansprechen und Toxizität nach LINAC-basierter stereotaktischer Radiochirurgie der gesamten Nervenzirkumferenz bei Trigeminusneuralgie – eine prospektive Beobachtungsstudie.

Journal

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]
ISSN: 1439-099X
Titre abrégé: Strahlenther Onkol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8603469

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Historique:
received: 24 10 2018
accepted: 26 02 2019
pubmed: 17 3 2019
medline: 13 2 2020
entrez: 17 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To prospectively evaluate the time course of pain response and toxicity after linear accelerator-based whole-nerve-encompassing radiosurgery (LINAC-SRS) using a uniform treatment schedule for dosing and target volume definition in patients with refractory trigeminal neuralgia. From December 2012 to December 2016, 21 patients were treated using a standardized protocol. Patients received LINAC-SRS with 70 Gy to the cisternal portion while aiming for the 90% isodose to fully envelope the nerve in one cross-sectional plane. Data on pain, analgesics, and toxicity were gathered prospectively. Four time intervals (1-6, 6-12, 12-18, and 18-24 months) were defined and compared to baseline and each other. The median follow-up from radiotherapy was 16 months. Freedom from pain was achieved at least once in 90.5, 81.0, and 85.7% of patients for everyday pain, rest pain, and pain peaks, respectively. At 1-6 months, pain was significantly reduced in everyday routine (mean VAS, 2.0/10 vs. 5.8/10; P = 0.004), at rest (1.5/10 vs. 4.0/10; P = 0.002), and for pain peaks (2.9/10 vs. 10/10; P < 0.001), as was the number of analgesics (mean 1.5 vs. 2.9; P < 0.001). No significant increase in pain or analgesics was observed for subsequent time intervals. At last follow-up, reduction in pain compared to baseline for everyday routine (2.1/10 vs. 5.8/10; P = 0.010) and for pain peaks (3.3/10 vs. 10/10; P < 0.001) was significant, whereas it was not for rest pain (1.8/10 vs. 3.9/10; P = 0.073). Most toxicities were related to trigeminal nerve impairment, with 42.9% reporting new-onset hypoesthesia at last follow-up. This study provides prospective data after whole nerve encompassing LINAC-SRS for trigeminal neuralgia. No significant pain relapse was observed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30877350
doi: 10.1007/s00066-019-01450-9
pii: 10.1007/s00066-019-01450-9
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

745-755

Références

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Jul 1;47(4):1013-9
pubmed: 10863073
J Neurosurg. 2000 Dec;93 Suppl 3:155-8
pubmed: 11143235
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Oct 1;51(2):449-54
pubmed: 11567820
Neurosurgery. 2003 Oct;53(4):823-8; discussion 828-30
pubmed: 14519214
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2004;82(5-6):244-9
pubmed: 15637446
Neurosurgery. 2005 Dec;57(6):1193-200; discussion 1193-200
pubmed: 16331167
Surg Neurol. 2006 Aug;66(2):127-35; discussion 135
pubmed: 16876597
Neurosurgery. 2007 Apr;60(4):681-7; discussion 687-8
pubmed: 17415205
Neuroepidemiology. 1991;10(5-6):276-81
pubmed: 1798430
Neurosurgery. 2008 May;62(5 Suppl):A53-60; discussion A60-1
pubmed: 18580781
J Neurosurg. 2008 Dec;109 Suppl:185-9
pubmed: 19123907
Neurosurgery. 2009 Feb;64(2 Suppl):A96-101
pubmed: 19165081
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010 Jul;152(7):1165-70
pubmed: 20204664
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2010;88(3):169-76
pubmed: 20431328
Neurosurgery. 2010 Dec;67(6):1637-44; discussion 1644-5
pubmed: 21107194
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Sep 1;81(1):225-31
pubmed: 21236592
World Neurosurg. 2010 Oct-Nov;74(4-5):538-43
pubmed: 21492609
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2011;89(4):220-5
pubmed: 21613807
Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3(Suppl 1):S17-25
pubmed: 22826806
J Clin Neurosci. 2012 Oct;19(10):1401-3
pubmed: 22898197
J Neurosurg. 2012 Dec;117 Suppl:189-96
pubmed: 23205809
J Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;119(5):1166-75
pubmed: 23600932
BMJ. 2014 Feb 17;348:g474
pubmed: 24534115
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 May 1;89(1):120-6
pubmed: 24613811
Pain Physician. 2015 Jan-Feb;18(1):15-27
pubmed: 25675056
Neurosurgery. 2015 Jul;77(1):87-94; discussion 94-5
pubmed: 25812065
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016 Jan-Feb;6(1):e1-7
pubmed: 26577003
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Sep 1;96(1):142-8
pubmed: 27325473
Strahlenther Onkol. 2017 Mar;193(3):185-191
pubmed: 27757503
Strahlenther Onkol. 2017 Mar;193(3):200-212
pubmed: 27928625
Pain. 2017 Jun;158(6):1166-1174
pubmed: 28114183
J Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;128(2):452-459
pubmed: 28298016
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Mar;18(2):136-143
pubmed: 28300370
J Neurosurg. 2018 Mar;128(3):891-896
pubmed: 28524797
Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 Dec;194(12):1132-1143
pubmed: 30203112
Acta Chir Scand. 1971;137(4):311-4
pubmed: 4948331

Auteurs

Selim Koca (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Luitpold Distel (L)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Dorota Lubgan (D)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Thomas Weissmann (T)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Ulrike Lambrecht (U)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Marga Lang-Welzenbach (M)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Ilker Eyüpoglu (I)

Department of Neurosurgery, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Barbara Bischoff (B)

Department of Neurosurgery, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Michael Buchfelder (M)

Department of Neurosurgery, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Sabine Semrau (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Rainer Fietkau (R)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Sebastian Lettmaier (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Florian Putz (F)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. florian.putz@uk-erlangen.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH