Time course of pain response and toxicity after whole-nerve-encompassing LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia-a prospective observational study.
Zeitverlauf von Schmerzansprechen und Toxizität nach LINAC-basierter stereotaktischer Radiochirurgie der gesamten Nervenzirkumferenz bei Trigeminusneuralgie – eine prospektive Beobachtungsstudie.
Facial pain
Radiosurgery
SRS
Toxicity
Trigeminal neuralgia
Journal
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]
ISSN: 1439-099X
Titre abrégé: Strahlenther Onkol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8603469
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
24
10
2018
accepted:
26
02
2019
pubmed:
17
3
2019
medline:
13
2
2020
entrez:
17
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To prospectively evaluate the time course of pain response and toxicity after linear accelerator-based whole-nerve-encompassing radiosurgery (LINAC-SRS) using a uniform treatment schedule for dosing and target volume definition in patients with refractory trigeminal neuralgia. From December 2012 to December 2016, 21 patients were treated using a standardized protocol. Patients received LINAC-SRS with 70 Gy to the cisternal portion while aiming for the 90% isodose to fully envelope the nerve in one cross-sectional plane. Data on pain, analgesics, and toxicity were gathered prospectively. Four time intervals (1-6, 6-12, 12-18, and 18-24 months) were defined and compared to baseline and each other. The median follow-up from radiotherapy was 16 months. Freedom from pain was achieved at least once in 90.5, 81.0, and 85.7% of patients for everyday pain, rest pain, and pain peaks, respectively. At 1-6 months, pain was significantly reduced in everyday routine (mean VAS, 2.0/10 vs. 5.8/10; P = 0.004), at rest (1.5/10 vs. 4.0/10; P = 0.002), and for pain peaks (2.9/10 vs. 10/10; P < 0.001), as was the number of analgesics (mean 1.5 vs. 2.9; P < 0.001). No significant increase in pain or analgesics was observed for subsequent time intervals. At last follow-up, reduction in pain compared to baseline for everyday routine (2.1/10 vs. 5.8/10; P = 0.010) and for pain peaks (3.3/10 vs. 10/10; P < 0.001) was significant, whereas it was not for rest pain (1.8/10 vs. 3.9/10; P = 0.073). Most toxicities were related to trigeminal nerve impairment, with 42.9% reporting new-onset hypoesthesia at last follow-up. This study provides prospective data after whole nerve encompassing LINAC-SRS for trigeminal neuralgia. No significant pain relapse was observed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30877350
doi: 10.1007/s00066-019-01450-9
pii: 10.1007/s00066-019-01450-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
745-755Références
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Jul 1;47(4):1013-9
pubmed: 10863073
J Neurosurg. 2000 Dec;93 Suppl 3:155-8
pubmed: 11143235
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Oct 1;51(2):449-54
pubmed: 11567820
Neurosurgery. 2003 Oct;53(4):823-8; discussion 828-30
pubmed: 14519214
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2004;82(5-6):244-9
pubmed: 15637446
Neurosurgery. 2005 Dec;57(6):1193-200; discussion 1193-200
pubmed: 16331167
Surg Neurol. 2006 Aug;66(2):127-35; discussion 135
pubmed: 16876597
Neurosurgery. 2007 Apr;60(4):681-7; discussion 687-8
pubmed: 17415205
Neuroepidemiology. 1991;10(5-6):276-81
pubmed: 1798430
Neurosurgery. 2008 May;62(5 Suppl):A53-60; discussion A60-1
pubmed: 18580781
J Neurosurg. 2008 Dec;109 Suppl:185-9
pubmed: 19123907
Neurosurgery. 2009 Feb;64(2 Suppl):A96-101
pubmed: 19165081
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010 Jul;152(7):1165-70
pubmed: 20204664
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2010;88(3):169-76
pubmed: 20431328
Neurosurgery. 2010 Dec;67(6):1637-44; discussion 1644-5
pubmed: 21107194
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Sep 1;81(1):225-31
pubmed: 21236592
World Neurosurg. 2010 Oct-Nov;74(4-5):538-43
pubmed: 21492609
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2011;89(4):220-5
pubmed: 21613807
Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3(Suppl 1):S17-25
pubmed: 22826806
J Clin Neurosci. 2012 Oct;19(10):1401-3
pubmed: 22898197
J Neurosurg. 2012 Dec;117 Suppl:189-96
pubmed: 23205809
J Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;119(5):1166-75
pubmed: 23600932
BMJ. 2014 Feb 17;348:g474
pubmed: 24534115
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 May 1;89(1):120-6
pubmed: 24613811
Pain Physician. 2015 Jan-Feb;18(1):15-27
pubmed: 25675056
Neurosurgery. 2015 Jul;77(1):87-94; discussion 94-5
pubmed: 25812065
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016 Jan-Feb;6(1):e1-7
pubmed: 26577003
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Sep 1;96(1):142-8
pubmed: 27325473
Strahlenther Onkol. 2017 Mar;193(3):185-191
pubmed: 27757503
Strahlenther Onkol. 2017 Mar;193(3):200-212
pubmed: 27928625
Pain. 2017 Jun;158(6):1166-1174
pubmed: 28114183
J Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;128(2):452-459
pubmed: 28298016
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Mar;18(2):136-143
pubmed: 28300370
J Neurosurg. 2018 Mar;128(3):891-896
pubmed: 28524797
Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 Dec;194(12):1132-1143
pubmed: 30203112
Acta Chir Scand. 1971;137(4):311-4
pubmed: 4948331