National-level environmental perceptions and walking among urban and rural residents: Informing surveillance of walkability.


Journal

Preventive medicine
ISSN: 1096-0260
Titre abrégé: Prev Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0322116

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2019
Historique:
received: 24 10 2018
revised: 05 03 2019
accepted: 11 03 2019
pubmed: 18 3 2019
medline: 6 5 2020
entrez: 18 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Built environments that provide activity-friendly routes (e.g., sidewalks) to everyday destinations (e.g., shops) can increase physical activity. Surveillance of supports and destinations is important, and identifying which are associated with walking could prioritize surveillance questions. Our purpose was to identify the significant associations between supports and destinations with walking among a nationally-representative sample of urban- and rural-dwelling adults. Participants in the 2015 National Health Interview Survey, Cancer Control Supplement (n = 29,925) reported the near-home presence of walkable supports (roads, sidewalks, paths, or trails; sidewalks on most streets), destinations (shops; transit; movies, libraries, or churches; relaxing places), and past-week walking for leisure or transportation. We used stepwise logistic regression to quantify associations between supports and destinations and walking, including by urban/rural residence. We calculated the prevalence of walking across counts of reported elements by urban/rural residence. Among all participants, roads, sidewalks, paths, or trails and relaxing destinations were associated with leisure walking. Among urban residents, sidewalks on most streets and all four destination types were associated with transportation walking; among rural residents, roads, sidewalks, paths, or trails; movies, libraries, or churches; and relaxing destinations were associated with transportation walking. Walking was more common when more environmental elements were reported. To improve efficiency, communities may match surveillance priorities to behavioral priorities (i.e., leisure versus transportation walking) and environmental context (i.e., urban/rural areas). Surveillance of environments supporting leisure walking might focus on recreation-oriented spaces. Surveillance of environments supporting transportation walking might differ for urban and rural areas, and assessing destinations may be particularly important.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30878571
pii: S0091-7435(19)30095-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.03.019
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101-108

Informations de copyright

Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Geoffrey P Whitfield (GP)

Division of Nutrition Physical Activity and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America. Electronic address: Xdh5@cdc.gov.

Susan A Carlson (SA)

Division of Nutrition Physical Activity and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Emily N Ussery (EN)

Division of Nutrition Physical Activity and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Kathleen B Watson (KB)

Division of Nutrition Physical Activity and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

David Berrigan (D)

Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.

Janet E Fulton (JE)

Division of Nutrition Physical Activity and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH