A novel method to address the association between received dose intensity and survival outcome: benefits of approaching treatment intensification at a more individualised level in a trial of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup.
Bone tumour
Chemotherapy
Personalised medicine
Sarcoma
Journal
Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology
ISSN: 1432-0843
Titre abrégé: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7806519
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
received:
08
11
2018
accepted:
08
02
2019
pubmed:
18
3
2019
medline:
13
2
2020
entrez:
18
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is lack of consensus on the prognostic value of received high dose intensity in osteosarcoma survivorship. Many studies have not shown a clear survival benefit when dose intensity is increased. The aim of this study is to go beyond chemotherapy intensification by arm-wide escalation of intended dose and/or compression of treatment schedule, while conversely addressing the relationship between treatment intensity and survival at the patient level. The study focusses on the difference in outcome results, based on a novel, progressively more individualised approach to dose intensity. A retrospective analysis of data from MRC BO06/EORTC 80931 randomised controlled trial for treatment of osteosarcoma was conducted. Three types of post hoc patient groups are formed using the intended regimen: the individually achieved cumulative dose and time on treatment, and the increase of individual cumulative dose over time. Event-free survival is investigated and compared in these three stratifications. The strata of intended regimen and achieved treatment yields equivalent results. Received cumulative dose over time produces groups with evident different survivorship characteristics. In particular, it highlights a group of patients with an estimated 3-year event-free survival much larger (more than 10%) than other patient groups. This group mostly contains patients randomised to an intensified regimen. In addition, adverse events reported by that group show the presence of increased preoperative myelotoxicity. The manuscript shows the benefits of analyzing studies by using longitudinal data, e.g. recorded per cycle. This has impact on the drafting of future trials by showing why such a level of detail is needed for both treatment and adverse event data. The novel method proposed, based on cumulative dose received over time, shows that longitudinal treatment data might be used to link survival outcome with drug metabolism. This is particularly valuable when pharmacogenetics data for metabolism of cytotoxic agents are not collected. ISRCTN86294690.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30879111
doi: 10.1007/s00280-019-03797-3
pii: 10.1007/s00280-019-03797-3
pmc: PMC6458990
doi:
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN86294690']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
951-962Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_U122861384
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12023/21
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Cancer Invest. 2004;22(4):555-68
pubmed: 15565814
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(29):e4282
pubmed: 27442667
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Dec 15;18(24):4028-37
pubmed: 11118463
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015 Aug;50(8):1083-8
pubmed: 26030048
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jun 20;31(18):2303-12
pubmed: 23669227
Cancer Res. 2009 Jul 1;69(13):5383-91
pubmed: 19549917
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2009 Jun;28(1-2):247-63
pubmed: 19214708
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Aug 1;21(15):3436-41
pubmed: 25829401
Med Oncol. 2017 Sep 8;34(10):178
pubmed: 28887613
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011 Mar;77(3):221-40
pubmed: 20227889
Cancer. 2012 Apr 1;118(7):1856-67
pubmed: 21887680
Anticancer Res. 2013 Aug;33(8):3423-30
pubmed: 23898114
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Mar;48(5):703-12
pubmed: 22036088
Cancer Treat Res. 2009;152:339-53
pubmed: 20213400
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Oct;17(10):1396-1408
pubmed: 27569442
Cancer. 1994 Aug 1;74(3 Suppl):1177-83
pubmed: 8039154
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Sep;16(9):3137-47
pubmed: 9738586
BMJ Open. 2019 May 30;9(5):e022980
pubmed: 31152023
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016 Dec;14(6):e575-e583
pubmed: 27102405
J Clin Oncol. 1990 Dec;8(12):1935-7
pubmed: 2230885
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Sep 20;25(27):4157-8
pubmed: 17698802
Cancer Treat Rev. 2014 May;40(4):523-32
pubmed: 24345772
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jun;151(2):405-13
pubmed: 25956059
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Aug 10;30(23):2861-8
pubmed: 22753904
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Jan 17;99(2):112-28
pubmed: 17227995