Predictive and Comparative Study Between Clinic Consensus Document for Pancreas Acceptance and Predictive Value of Preprocurement Pancreas Allocation Suitability Score (P-PASS).
Journal
Transplantation proceedings
ISSN: 1873-2623
Titre abrégé: Transplant Proc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0243532
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
07
08
2018
accepted:
23
10
2018
entrez:
19
3
2019
pubmed:
19
3
2019
medline:
15
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The strict selection of pancreas for transplant has forced the development of different documents to select the suitable organ in order to minimize the risks and complications of the transplant. In 2008, Eurotransplant published the Preprocurement Pancreas Allocation Suitability Score (P-PASS) for pretransplant selection. In 2001 the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona developed a Clinical Consensus Document (CCD). We aimed to analyze the predictive decision of the pancreas acceptance to offers received in the hospital, according to the CCD criteria and compare it with the recommended value of suitability for accepting the pancreas according to the P-PASS value. We performed a retrospective comparative study between the criteria of selection of the CCD for pancreas from 2016-2017 in comparison with the values obtained if the P-PASS had been used: ≤ 17, acceptance criteria and P-PASS; > 17, risk criteria. We defined the organ reported as rejected or accepted. The accepted organ could be procured and transplanted or discarded. With the CCD criteria, 7 more organs were transplanted than if we only applied the potential P-PASS criteria. In contrast, P-PASS would have ruled out an additional 9% of pancreases in relation to CCD criteria. According our experience, it is difficult to find an adequate prediction model to select pancreas for transplantation. The application of the DCC criteria increases the number of organs valid for transplantation. At present, new criteria should be re-evaluated within multicenter studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30879542
pii: S0041-1345(18)31043-1
doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.10.001
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
365-368Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.