Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial of an Ab Interno Implanted Trabecular Micro-Bypass in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataract: Two-Year Results.


Journal

Ophthalmology
ISSN: 1549-4713
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802443

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2019
Historique:
received: 27 07 2018
revised: 04 03 2019
accepted: 04 03 2019
pubmed: 19 3 2019
medline: 25 1 2020
entrez: 19 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an ab interno implanted (iStent inject) Trabecular Micro-Bypass System (Glaukos Corporation, San Clemente, CA) in combination with cataract surgery in subjects with mild to moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Prospective, randomized, single-masked, concurrently controlled, multicenter clinical trial. Eyes with mild to moderate POAG and preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤24 mmHg on 1 to 3 medications, unmedicated diurnal IOP (DIOP) 21 to 36 mmHg, and cataract requiring surgery. After uncomplicated cataract surgery, eyes were randomized 3:1 intraoperatively to ab interno implantation of iStent inject (Model G2-M-IS; treatment group, n = 387) or no stent implantation (control group, n = 118). Subjects were followed through 2 years postoperatively. Annual washout of ocular hypotensive medication was performed. Effectiveness end points were ≥20% reduction from baseline in month 24 unmedicated DIOP and change in unmedicated month 24 DIOP from baseline. Safety measures included best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), slit-lamp and fundus examinations, gonioscopy, pachymetry, specular microscopy, visual fields, complications, and adverse events. The groups were well balanced preoperatively, including medicated IOP (17.5 mmHg in both groups) and unmedicated DIOP (24.8±3.3 mmHg vs. 24.5±3.1 mmHg in the treatment and control groups, respectively, P = 0.33). At 24 months, 75.8% of treatment eyes versus 61.9% of control eyes experienced ≥20% reduction from baseline in unmedicated DIOP (P = 0.005), and mean reduction in unmedicated DIOP from baseline was greater in treatment eyes (7.0±4.0 mmHg) than in control eyes (5.4±3.7 mmHg; P < 0.001). Of the responders, 84% of treatment eyes and 67% of control eyes were not receiving ocular hypotensive medication at 23 months. Furthermore, 63.2% of treatment eyes versus 50.0% of control eyes had month 24 medication-free DIOP ≤18 mmHg (difference 13.2%; 95% confidence interval, 2.9-23.4). The overall safety profile of the treatment group was favorable and similar to that in the control group throughout the 2-year follow-up. Clinically and statistically greater reductions in IOP without medication were achieved after iStent inject implantation with cataract surgery versus cataract surgery alone, with excellent safety through 2 years.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30880108
pii: S0161-6420(18)31990-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.03.006
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antihypertensive Agents 0

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

811-821

Investigateurs

William Bartlett (W)
Carlos Buznego (C)
Starck Johnson (S)
Francis A D'Ambrosio (FA)
Doug Dehning (D)
Harvey DuBiner (H)
Raj Goyal (R)
Bret Hughes (B)
Robert E Marquis (RE)
Robert Noecker (R)
Shachar Tauber (S)
Bernard R Perez (BR)
Lawrence Roel (L)
Steven Sarkisian (S)
Steven Silverstein (S)
Steven Day (S)
Kerry Solomon (K)
Farrell Tyson (F)
Steven Vold (S)
Thomas Samuelson (T)
Steven Simmons (S)
Michael Stiles (M)
Quang H Nguyen (QH)
Kent P Bashford (KP)
Brian Flowers (B)
William J Flynn (WJ)
Joseph Gira (J)
Constance Okeke (C)
George R Reiss (GR)
Sydney L Tyson (SL)
Greg Parkhurst (G)
John Linn (J)
David Lubeck (D)
Jonathan Solomon (J)
Inder Paul Singh (IP)
R Duncan Johnson (RD)
Christopher Lin (C)
Joshua W Kim (JW)
Charles J Crane (CJ)
Frank Cotter (F)

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Thomas W Samuelson (TW)

Minnesota Eye Consultants, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Electronic address: twsamuelson@mneye.com.

Steven R Sarkisian (SR)

Dean McGee Eye Institute, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

David M Lubeck (DM)

Arbor Centers for EyeCare, Homewood, Illinois.

Michael C Stiles (MC)

Stiles Eyecare Excellence and Glaucoma Institute PA, Overland Park, Kansas.

Yi-Jing Duh (YJ)

StatServ Consulting Inc, Chino Hills, California.

Eeke A Romo (EA)

ClinReg Consulting Services, Laguna Beach, California.

Jane Ellen Giamporcaro (JE)

Glaukos Corporation, San Clemente, California.

Dana M Hornbeak (DM)

Glaukos Corporation, San Clemente, California.

L Jay Katz (LJ)

Glaukos Corporation, San Clemente, California; Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH