Outcome of buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty: a detailed analysis of success, morbidity and quality of life in a contemporary patient cohort at a referral center.


Journal

BMC urology
ISSN: 1471-2490
Titre abrégé: BMC Urol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968571

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Mar 2019
Historique:
received: 15 12 2017
accepted: 08 03 2019
entrez: 20 3 2019
pubmed: 20 3 2019
medline: 19 7 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To evaluate outcome of buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty (BMGU) for the treatment of urethral stricture disease, including a detailed analysis of success, morbidity and quality of life (QoL). Between 12/05/2008 and 07/21/2010, 187 patients with urethral stricture disease, who were treated with BMGU at our University Medical Center, received a standardized questionnaire, evaluating postoperative success, morbidity and QoL. The primary endpoint was the success, i.e., stricture recurrence-free survival plus patients' satisfaction with surgery. Secondary endpoints included erectile function, voiding symptoms, pain and health-related QoL, which were assessed with a modified Urethral Stricture Surgery Patient Reported Outcome Measure (USS PROM), including the Erectile Function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF), Incontinence Questionnaire Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Module (ICIQ-MLUTS) and EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D). In total, 83 patients (51.9%) completed the questionnaire. Bulbar, penile and panurethral strictures were found in 69 patients (83.1%), 13 patients (15.7%) and one patient (1.2%), respectively. The median length of the stricture was 5 cm (range: 1-16). At a median follow-up of 46 months (range: 36-54), 65 patients (78.3%) had no stricture recurrence and were satisfied with BMGU. Median scores for ICIQ-MLUTS, IIEF-EF and EQ-5D visual analogue scale were 6, 22 and 80, respectively. Based on USS PROM, postoperative improvement of QoL and satisfaction with BMGU was found in 67 patients (80.7%) and 68 patients (81.9%), respectively. In patients with urethral stricture disease, BMGU offers excellent success, morbidity and QoL.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
To evaluate outcome of buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty (BMGU) for the treatment of urethral stricture disease, including a detailed analysis of success, morbidity and quality of life (QoL).
METHODS METHODS
Between 12/05/2008 and 07/21/2010, 187 patients with urethral stricture disease, who were treated with BMGU at our University Medical Center, received a standardized questionnaire, evaluating postoperative success, morbidity and QoL. The primary endpoint was the success, i.e., stricture recurrence-free survival plus patients' satisfaction with surgery. Secondary endpoints included erectile function, voiding symptoms, pain and health-related QoL, which were assessed with a modified Urethral Stricture Surgery Patient Reported Outcome Measure (USS PROM), including the Erectile Function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF), Incontinence Questionnaire Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Module (ICIQ-MLUTS) and EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D).
RESULTS RESULTS
In total, 83 patients (51.9%) completed the questionnaire. Bulbar, penile and panurethral strictures were found in 69 patients (83.1%), 13 patients (15.7%) and one patient (1.2%), respectively. The median length of the stricture was 5 cm (range: 1-16). At a median follow-up of 46 months (range: 36-54), 65 patients (78.3%) had no stricture recurrence and were satisfied with BMGU. Median scores for ICIQ-MLUTS, IIEF-EF and EQ-5D visual analogue scale were 6, 22 and 80, respectively. Based on USS PROM, postoperative improvement of QoL and satisfaction with BMGU was found in 67 patients (80.7%) and 68 patients (81.9%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In patients with urethral stricture disease, BMGU offers excellent success, morbidity and QoL.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30885184
doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0449-5
pii: 10.1186/s12894-019-0449-5
pmc: PMC6421675
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

18

Références

Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208
pubmed: 10109801
J Urol. 2000 Dec;164(6):1948-55
pubmed: 11061889
J Urol. 2003 May;169(5):1754-7
pubmed: 12686826
J Urol. 2004 Feb;171(2 Pt 1):726-9
pubmed: 14713797
BJU Int. 2007 Mar;99(3):607-11
pubmed: 17155967
BJU Int. 2009 May;103(10):1444-7
pubmed: 19453552
J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):613-7
pubmed: 20018318
J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):657-61
pubmed: 20018319
BJU Int. 2011 Jan;107(1):6-26
pubmed: 21176068
Eur Urol. 2011 May;59(5):797-814
pubmed: 21353379
Eur Urol. 2011 Jul;60(1):60-8
pubmed: 21419566
Urology. 2011 Jul;78(1):78-81
pubmed: 21550645
Urol Int. 2011;87(3):341-5
pubmed: 21952068
Urology. 2012 Feb;79(2):443-7
pubmed: 22119261
BJU Int. 2012 Jan;109(1):150-62
pubmed: 22151751
BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3 Pt B):E132-6
pubmed: 22985312
J Endourol. 2013 Jul;27(7):925-9
pubmed: 23488676
Urology. 2013 Jun;81(6):1357-61
pubmed: 23522293
Eur Urol. 2013 Nov;64(5):777-82
pubmed: 23664422
BJU Int. 2013 Sep;112(5):655-63
pubmed: 23924424
Urology. 2014 Mar;83(3 Suppl):S31-47
pubmed: 24411214
J Urol. 2014 Sep;192(3):808-13
pubmed: 24533999
J Urol. 2014 Dec;192(6):1725-9
pubmed: 24998481
Urology. 2014 Oct;84(4):928-32; quiz 932-3
pubmed: 25129537
J Urol. 2015 Aug;194(2):441-6
pubmed: 25846417
Int J Urol. 2015 Jul;22(7):695-9
pubmed: 25903524
World J Urol. 2016 Mar;34(3):369-75
pubmed: 26049865
Transl Androl Urol. 2015 Feb;4(1):10-5
pubmed: 26816804
Br J Urol. 1996 Apr;77(4):554-62
pubmed: 8777617
Urology. 1997 Jun;49(6):822-30
pubmed: 9187685

Auteurs

Armin Soave (A)

Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Luis Kluth (L)

Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Roland Dahlem (R)

Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Amelie Rohwer (A)

Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Michael Rink (M)

Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Philipp Reiss (P)

Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Margit Fisch (M)

Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Oliver Engel (O)

Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. o.engel@uke.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH