Modular tumor prostheses: are current stem designs suitable for distal femoral reconstruction? A biomechanical implant stability analysis in Sawbones.
Distal femur
Implant fixation
MUTARS
Megaprosthesis
Primary stability
Tumor prosthesis
Journal
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
ISSN: 1434-3916
Titre abrégé: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9011043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
19
07
2018
pubmed:
20
3
2019
medline:
2
8
2019
entrez:
20
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
High loosening rates after distal femoral replacement may be due to implant design not adapted to specific anatomic and biomechanical conditions. A modular tumor system (MUTARS Although areas of highest relative micromotions were measured distally in all groups, areas and lengths of main fixation differed with respect to stem design and bone defect size. Regardless of these changes, overall micromotions could only be reduced with extending bone defects in case of tapered stems. The tapered design may be favorable in larger defects whereas the hexagonal may be advantageous in defects located more distally.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30887123
doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03158-y
pii: 10.1007/s00402-019-03158-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng