The Relationship of Breast Density and Positive Lumpectomy Margins.


Journal

Annals of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1534-4681
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9420840

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Historique:
received: 17 12 2018
pubmed: 20 3 2019
medline: 12 9 2019
entrez: 20 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

A positive lumpectomy margin after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a significant predictor for ipsilateral cancer recurrence. The MarginProbe, a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved device for intraoperative assessment of lumpectomy margins, is associated with a reduction in re-excision surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship of mammographic breast density (MBD) and clinicopathologic characteristics with margin status in women undergoing BCS with the MarginProbe. The institutional database was queried for patients with breast cancer who had BCS with the MarginProbe from 2013 to 2017. Clinicopathologic characteristics were collected. The study defined MBD as less dense (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] A and B) and more dense (BI-RADS C and D). A positive margin was defined as smaller than 1 mm. Pearson Chi square and uni- and multivariate logistic regression were performed. Of 1734 patients, 341 met the study criteria. The median patient age was 63 years. The patients with higher mammographic density were younger (p < 0.0001) and had a lower body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.0001). The patients with higher MBD were more likely to present with a palpable mass (p = 0.0360). Of the 341 patients, 135 (39.6%) had one or more positive margins on the main specimen, and 101 (74.8%) were converted to final negative margins after the MarginProbe directed re-excisions. Positive final margins were associated with larger tumor size (p = 0.0242) and more advanced stage of disease at diagnosis (p = 0.0255). In this study of patients undergoing BCS, breast density was not correlated with the likelihood of a positive margin. The presence of positive final lumpectomy margins was associated with older age and more extensive disease.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
A positive lumpectomy margin after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a significant predictor for ipsilateral cancer recurrence. The MarginProbe, a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved device for intraoperative assessment of lumpectomy margins, is associated with a reduction in re-excision surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship of mammographic breast density (MBD) and clinicopathologic characteristics with margin status in women undergoing BCS with the MarginProbe.
METHODS METHODS
The institutional database was queried for patients with breast cancer who had BCS with the MarginProbe from 2013 to 2017. Clinicopathologic characteristics were collected. The study defined MBD as less dense (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] A and B) and more dense (BI-RADS C and D). A positive margin was defined as smaller than 1 mm. Pearson Chi square and uni- and multivariate logistic regression were performed.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 1734 patients, 341 met the study criteria. The median patient age was 63 years. The patients with higher mammographic density were younger (p < 0.0001) and had a lower body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.0001). The patients with higher MBD were more likely to present with a palpable mass (p = 0.0360). Of the 341 patients, 135 (39.6%) had one or more positive margins on the main specimen, and 101 (74.8%) were converted to final negative margins after the MarginProbe directed re-excisions. Positive final margins were associated with larger tumor size (p = 0.0242) and more advanced stage of disease at diagnosis (p = 0.0255).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In this study of patients undergoing BCS, breast density was not correlated with the likelihood of a positive margin. The presence of positive final lumpectomy margins was associated with older age and more extensive disease.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30888516
doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07295-x
pii: 10.1245/s10434-019-07295-x
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1729-1736

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Jessica C Gooch (JC)

Department of Surgery, Division of Breast Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, USA.
Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA.

Esther Yoon (E)

Department of Pathology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, USA.

Jennifer Chun (J)

Department of Surgery, Division of Breast Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, USA.

Elianna Kaplowitz (E)

Department of Surgery, Division of Breast Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, USA.

Talia Jubas (T)

New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA.

Amber Guth (A)

Department of Surgery, Division of Breast Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, USA.

Deborah Axelrod (D)

Department of Surgery, Division of Breast Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, USA.

Richard Shapiro (R)

Department of Surgery, Division of Breast Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, USA.

Farbod Darvishian (F)

Department of Pathology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, USA.

Freya Schnabel (F)

Department of Surgery, Division of Breast Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, USA. freya.schnabel@nyumc.org.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH