Topical Fisionerv® is effective in treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain.
Journal
Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis
ISSN: 2531-6745
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomed
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101295064
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 01 2019
24 01 2019
Historique:
received:
23
03
2017
accepted:
25
05
2017
entrez:
20
3
2019
pubmed:
20
3
2019
medline:
18
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Management of neuropathic pain (Neu P) is complex and difficult. Although there are several therapeutic options, treatment with Neu P is often inadequate, which led to undertreated patients. Thus, it would be desirable, for Neu P treatment, further multimechanistics approaches. The aim of the present study was to evaluate, in Neu P management, the effectiveness of "FISIONERV, a gel for topical use. This study was conducted in the "Rehabilitation Unit of N. Melli's Hospital, Brindisi, Italy". In this study a double- blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted over 8-week treatment on 58 outpatients affected by Neu P caused by lumbar sciatica or lumbar disk herniation and/or lumbar canal stenosis (31 subjects), or with carpal tunnel syndrome (27 subjects), randomly assigned to the following two groups: Group A; n=29, received (fisionerv® gel, 3 times/day) added to physiotherapy (forty minutes-daily session). Group B; n=29 received a vehicle gel (placebo, 3 times/day) added to physiotherapy (forty minutes-daily session). Pain was assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS). Neuropathic symptoms frequency (pain, burning, paraesthesiae and numbness) were scored at baseline and at the end of the treatment. Treatment compliance and safety were also evaluated. Both groups experienced a significant reduction in VAS and neuropathic symptoms after 8-treatment weeks. However, a significant (p<0.05) improvement was observed in group A (VAS mean 5.3 (1.10) with respect to group B (VAS mean=6.17 (0.80), already after 4 weeks of treatment. A further VAS reduction was recorded at 8 treatment weeks, with significant difference between the treatments (group A: VAS mean=1.89 (0.77); group B: VAS mean=3.79 (1.20) (p<0.001). In addition, more patients of the group A, than in group B, reported an improvement of their neurophatc pain (p<0.01). No adverse drug reaction was observed. Use of fisionerv®, in combination with physiotherapy, resulted a useful approach to NP treatment. These preliminary observations suggest that some interesting goals (better pain control and physical wellbeing) could be achieved by a multimodal therapy in NP patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Management of neuropathic pain (Neu P) is complex and difficult. Although there are several therapeutic options, treatment with Neu P is often inadequate, which led to undertreated patients. Thus, it would be desirable, for Neu P treatment, further multimechanistics approaches.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the present study was to evaluate, in Neu P management, the effectiveness of "FISIONERV, a gel for topical use.
SETTING
This study was conducted in the "Rehabilitation Unit of N. Melli's Hospital, Brindisi, Italy".
PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION
In this study a double- blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted over 8-week treatment on 58 outpatients affected by Neu P caused by lumbar sciatica or lumbar disk herniation and/or lumbar canal stenosis (31 subjects), or with carpal tunnel syndrome (27 subjects), randomly assigned to the following two groups: Group A; n=29, received (fisionerv® gel, 3 times/day) added to physiotherapy (forty minutes-daily session). Group B; n=29 received a vehicle gel (placebo, 3 times/day) added to physiotherapy (forty minutes-daily session).
MEASUREMENTS
Pain was assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS). Neuropathic symptoms frequency (pain, burning, paraesthesiae and numbness) were scored at baseline and at the end of the treatment. Treatment compliance and safety were also evaluated.
RESULTS
Both groups experienced a significant reduction in VAS and neuropathic symptoms after 8-treatment weeks. However, a significant (p<0.05) improvement was observed in group A (VAS mean 5.3 (1.10) with respect to group B (VAS mean=6.17 (0.80), already after 4 weeks of treatment. A further VAS reduction was recorded at 8 treatment weeks, with significant difference between the treatments (group A: VAS mean=1.89 (0.77); group B: VAS mean=3.79 (1.20) (p<0.001). In addition, more patients of the group A, than in group B, reported an improvement of their neurophatc pain (p<0.01). No adverse drug reaction was observed.
CONCLUSION
Use of fisionerv®, in combination with physiotherapy, resulted a useful approach to NP treatment.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT
These preliminary observations suggest that some interesting goals (better pain control and physical wellbeing) could be achieved by a multimodal therapy in NP patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30889155
doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i1.6305
pmc: PMC6502153
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
51-55Références
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015 Apr 01;8:147-50
pubmed: 25848312
Eur J Pain. 2017 Jan;21(1):29-44
pubmed: 27341614
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2010 Oct;110(10):605-7
pubmed: 21068226
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804
pubmed: 16000093
J Pain. 2008 Feb;9(2):105-21
pubmed: 18055266
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Feb 18;16:12
pubmed: 26892406
Pain. 1994 Feb;56(2):217-226
pubmed: 8008411
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Nov-Dec;18(6):927-32
pubmed: 19535272
Handb Clin Neurol. 2006;81:705-13
pubmed: 18808869