Non-linear regression models for time to flowering in wild chickpea combine genetic and climatic factors.
Climatic factors
GWAS
Model
Wild chickpea
Journal
BMC plant biology
ISSN: 1471-2229
Titre abrégé: BMC Plant Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967807
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Mar 2019
19 Mar 2019
Historique:
entrez:
21
3
2019
pubmed:
21
3
2019
medline:
26
3
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Accurate prediction of crop flowering time is required for reaching maximal farm efficiency. Several models developed to accomplish this goal are based on deep knowledge of plant phenology, requiring large investment for every individual crop or new variety. Mathematical modeling can be used to make better use of more shallow data and to extract information from it with higher efficiency. Cultivars of chickpea, Cicer arietanum, are currently being improved by introgressing wild C. reticulatum biodiversity with very different flowering time requirements. More understanding is required for how flowering time will depend on environmental conditions in these cultivars developed by introgression of wild alleles. We built a novel model for flowering time of wild chickpeas collected at 21 different sites in Turkey and grown in 4 distinct environmental conditions over several different years and seasons. We propose a general approach, in which the analytic forms of dependence of flowering time on climatic parameters, their regression coefficients, and a set of predictors are inferred automatically by stochastic minimization of the deviation of the model output from data. By using a combination of Grammatical Evolution and Differential Evolution Entirely Parallel method, we have identified a model that reflects the influence of effects of day length, temperature, humidity and precipitation and has a coefficient of determination of R We used our model to test two important hypotheses. We propose that chickpea phenology may be strongly predicted by accession geographic origin, as well as local environmental conditions at the site of growth. Indeed, the site of origin-by-growth environment interaction accounts for about 14.7% of variation in time period from sowing to flowering. Secondly, as the adaptation to specific environments is blueprinted in genomes, the effects of genes on flowering time may be conditioned on environmental factors. Genotype-by-environment interaction accounts for about 17.2% of overall variation in flowering time. We also identified several genomic markers associated with different reactions to climatic factor changes. Our methodology is general and can be further applied to extend existing crop models, especially when phenological information is limited.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Accurate prediction of crop flowering time is required for reaching maximal farm efficiency. Several models developed to accomplish this goal are based on deep knowledge of plant phenology, requiring large investment for every individual crop or new variety. Mathematical modeling can be used to make better use of more shallow data and to extract information from it with higher efficiency. Cultivars of chickpea, Cicer arietanum, are currently being improved by introgressing wild C. reticulatum biodiversity with very different flowering time requirements. More understanding is required for how flowering time will depend on environmental conditions in these cultivars developed by introgression of wild alleles.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We built a novel model for flowering time of wild chickpeas collected at 21 different sites in Turkey and grown in 4 distinct environmental conditions over several different years and seasons. We propose a general approach, in which the analytic forms of dependence of flowering time on climatic parameters, their regression coefficients, and a set of predictors are inferred automatically by stochastic minimization of the deviation of the model output from data. By using a combination of Grammatical Evolution and Differential Evolution Entirely Parallel method, we have identified a model that reflects the influence of effects of day length, temperature, humidity and precipitation and has a coefficient of determination of R
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We used our model to test two important hypotheses. We propose that chickpea phenology may be strongly predicted by accession geographic origin, as well as local environmental conditions at the site of growth. Indeed, the site of origin-by-growth environment interaction accounts for about 14.7% of variation in time period from sowing to flowering. Secondly, as the adaptation to specific environments is blueprinted in genomes, the effects of genes on flowering time may be conditioned on environmental factors. Genotype-by-environment interaction accounts for about 17.2% of overall variation in flowering time. We also identified several genomic markers associated with different reactions to climatic factor changes. Our methodology is general and can be further applied to extend existing crop models, especially when phenological information is limited.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30890147
doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1685-2
pii: 10.1186/s12870-019-1685-2
pmc: PMC6423741
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
94Références
Agric Syst. 2017 Jul;155:225-239
pubmed: 28701815
Nat Commun. 2018 Feb 13;9(1):649
pubmed: 29440741
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Apr 13;8:548
pubmed: 28450875
BMC Plant Biol. 2012 Mar 07;12:32
pubmed: 22394582
Nat Genet. 2011 Feb;43(2):163-8
pubmed: 21217757
DNA Res. 2015 Apr;22(2):133-45
pubmed: 25627243
Funct Plant Biol. 2003 Nov;30(10):1081-1087
pubmed: 32689090
Int J Biometeorol. 2018 May;62(5):823-832
pubmed: 29196806
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010 Apr;13(2):206-12
pubmed: 20097596
J Supercomput. 2011 Jan 1;57(2):172-178
pubmed: 22223930
Agric Syst. 2017 Jul;155:240-254
pubmed: 28701816
Agric Syst. 2017 Jul;155:269-288
pubmed: 28701818
Nat Commun. 2014 Oct 08;5:5087
pubmed: 25295980
Bioinformatics. 2007 Oct 1;23(19):2633-5
pubmed: 17586829
BMC Genomics. 2013 Jun 27;14:424
pubmed: 23802597
Plant Mol Biol. 2015 Nov;89(4-5):403-20
pubmed: 26394865
Nat Genet. 2011 Feb;43(2):159-62
pubmed: 21217756
Theor Appl Genet. 2015 May;128(5):851-64
pubmed: 25690716
Plant Cell Environ. 2013 Sep;36(9):1658-72
pubmed: 23600481
Sci Adv. 2015 Jul 03;1(6):e1400218
pubmed: 26601206
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Nov 22;7:1666
pubmed: 27920780