Non-linear regression models for time to flowering in wild chickpea combine genetic and climatic factors.


Journal

BMC plant biology
ISSN: 1471-2229
Titre abrégé: BMC Plant Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967807

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Mar 2019
Historique:
entrez: 21 3 2019
pubmed: 21 3 2019
medline: 26 3 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Accurate prediction of crop flowering time is required for reaching maximal farm efficiency. Several models developed to accomplish this goal are based on deep knowledge of plant phenology, requiring large investment for every individual crop or new variety. Mathematical modeling can be used to make better use of more shallow data and to extract information from it with higher efficiency. Cultivars of chickpea, Cicer arietanum, are currently being improved by introgressing wild C. reticulatum biodiversity with very different flowering time requirements. More understanding is required for how flowering time will depend on environmental conditions in these cultivars developed by introgression of wild alleles. We built a novel model for flowering time of wild chickpeas collected at 21 different sites in Turkey and grown in 4 distinct environmental conditions over several different years and seasons. We propose a general approach, in which the analytic forms of dependence of flowering time on climatic parameters, their regression coefficients, and a set of predictors are inferred automatically by stochastic minimization of the deviation of the model output from data. By using a combination of Grammatical Evolution and Differential Evolution Entirely Parallel method, we have identified a model that reflects the influence of effects of day length, temperature, humidity and precipitation and has a coefficient of determination of R We used our model to test two important hypotheses. We propose that chickpea phenology may be strongly predicted by accession geographic origin, as well as local environmental conditions at the site of growth. Indeed, the site of origin-by-growth environment interaction accounts for about 14.7% of variation in time period from sowing to flowering. Secondly, as the adaptation to specific environments is blueprinted in genomes, the effects of genes on flowering time may be conditioned on environmental factors. Genotype-by-environment interaction accounts for about 17.2% of overall variation in flowering time. We also identified several genomic markers associated with different reactions to climatic factor changes. Our methodology is general and can be further applied to extend existing crop models, especially when phenological information is limited.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Accurate prediction of crop flowering time is required for reaching maximal farm efficiency. Several models developed to accomplish this goal are based on deep knowledge of plant phenology, requiring large investment for every individual crop or new variety. Mathematical modeling can be used to make better use of more shallow data and to extract information from it with higher efficiency. Cultivars of chickpea, Cicer arietanum, are currently being improved by introgressing wild C. reticulatum biodiversity with very different flowering time requirements. More understanding is required for how flowering time will depend on environmental conditions in these cultivars developed by introgression of wild alleles.
RESULTS RESULTS
We built a novel model for flowering time of wild chickpeas collected at 21 different sites in Turkey and grown in 4 distinct environmental conditions over several different years and seasons. We propose a general approach, in which the analytic forms of dependence of flowering time on climatic parameters, their regression coefficients, and a set of predictors are inferred automatically by stochastic minimization of the deviation of the model output from data. By using a combination of Grammatical Evolution and Differential Evolution Entirely Parallel method, we have identified a model that reflects the influence of effects of day length, temperature, humidity and precipitation and has a coefficient of determination of R
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We used our model to test two important hypotheses. We propose that chickpea phenology may be strongly predicted by accession geographic origin, as well as local environmental conditions at the site of growth. Indeed, the site of origin-by-growth environment interaction accounts for about 14.7% of variation in time period from sowing to flowering. Secondly, as the adaptation to specific environments is blueprinted in genomes, the effects of genes on flowering time may be conditioned on environmental factors. Genotype-by-environment interaction accounts for about 17.2% of overall variation in flowering time. We also identified several genomic markers associated with different reactions to climatic factor changes. Our methodology is general and can be further applied to extend existing crop models, especially when phenological information is limited.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30890147
doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1685-2
pii: 10.1186/s12870-019-1685-2
pmc: PMC6423741
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

94

Références

Agric Syst. 2017 Jul;155:225-239
pubmed: 28701815
Nat Commun. 2018 Feb 13;9(1):649
pubmed: 29440741
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Apr 13;8:548
pubmed: 28450875
BMC Plant Biol. 2012 Mar 07;12:32
pubmed: 22394582
Nat Genet. 2011 Feb;43(2):163-8
pubmed: 21217757
DNA Res. 2015 Apr;22(2):133-45
pubmed: 25627243
Funct Plant Biol. 2003 Nov;30(10):1081-1087
pubmed: 32689090
Int J Biometeorol. 2018 May;62(5):823-832
pubmed: 29196806
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010 Apr;13(2):206-12
pubmed: 20097596
J Supercomput. 2011 Jan 1;57(2):172-178
pubmed: 22223930
Agric Syst. 2017 Jul;155:240-254
pubmed: 28701816
Agric Syst. 2017 Jul;155:269-288
pubmed: 28701818
Nat Commun. 2014 Oct 08;5:5087
pubmed: 25295980
Bioinformatics. 2007 Oct 1;23(19):2633-5
pubmed: 17586829
BMC Genomics. 2013 Jun 27;14:424
pubmed: 23802597
Plant Mol Biol. 2015 Nov;89(4-5):403-20
pubmed: 26394865
Nat Genet. 2011 Feb;43(2):159-62
pubmed: 21217756
Theor Appl Genet. 2015 May;128(5):851-64
pubmed: 25690716
Plant Cell Environ. 2013 Sep;36(9):1658-72
pubmed: 23600481
Sci Adv. 2015 Jul 03;1(6):e1400218
pubmed: 26601206
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Nov 22;7:1666
pubmed: 27920780

Auteurs

Konstantin Kozlov (K)

Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29 Polytechnicheskaya, St. Petersburg, 195251, Russia.

Anupam Singh (A)

Program Molecular and Computation Biology, University of California, University Park, Los-Angeles, 24105, CA, USA.

Jens Berger (J)

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), Agriculture and Food, Underwood Ave, Perth, 6014, WA, Australia.

Eric Bishop-von Wettberg (E)

Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Vermont, 63 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, 05405, VT, USA.

Abdullah Kahraman (A)

Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Harran University, Osmanbey Campus, Sanliurfa, 63100, Turkey.

Abdulkadir Aydogan (A)

Central Research Institute for Field Crops (CRIFC), P.O. Box 226, Ankara, 06042, Turkey.

Douglas Cook (D)

Deptartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, One Shields Ave, Davis, 95616-8680, CA, USA.

Sergey Nuzhdin (S)

Program Molecular and Computation Biology, University of California, University Park, Los-Angeles, 24105, CA, USA.

Maria Samsonova (M)

Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29 Polytechnicheskaya, St. Petersburg, 195251, Russia. m.g.samsonova@gmail.com.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Humans Medical Futility Turkey Qualitative Research Terminal Care
Humans Meta-Analysis as Topic Sample Size Models, Statistical Computer Simulation
Humans Perioperative Period Systematic Reviews as Topic Regression Analysis Developing Countries

Classifications MeSH