Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote colorectal cancer progression via CCR5.
Aged
Animals
Bone Marrow
/ metabolism
Chemokine CCL3
/ blood
Chemokine CCL4
/ blood
Chemokine CCL5
/ blood
Colonic Neoplasms
/ genetics
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ genetics
Culture Media, Conditioned
Disease Progression
Female
HCT116 Cells
HT29 Cells
Humans
Mesenchymal Stem Cells
/ metabolism
Mice
Mice, Nude
Prognosis
Receptors, CCR5
/ blood
Signal Transduction
/ genetics
Transplantation, Heterologous
Journal
Cell death & disease
ISSN: 2041-4889
Titre abrégé: Cell Death Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101524092
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 03 2019
19 03 2019
Historique:
received:
06
12
2018
accepted:
05
03
2019
revised:
21
02
2019
entrez:
21
3
2019
pubmed:
21
3
2019
medline:
16
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are recruited from BM to the stroma of developing tumors, where they serve as critical components of the tumor microenvironment by secreting growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines. The role of MSCs in colorectal cancer (CRC) progression was controversial. In this study, we found that C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) ligands (i.e., C-C motif chemokine ligand 3 (CCL3), CCL4, and CCL5) were highly produced from MSCs using a chemokine array screening with conditioned media from the cultured human MSCs. A relatively strong CCR5 expression could be detected within the cytoplasm of several CRC cell lines. Regarding the effect of MSC, we found that the xenografts in which CCR5-overexpressing HCT116 cells were inoculated into immunocompromised mice were highly promoted in vivo by a mixture with MSCs. Notably, the CCR5 inhibitor, maraviroc, significantly abolished the MSC-induced tumor growth in vivo. In human clinical specimens (n = 89), 20 cases (29%) were high for CCR5, whereas 69 cases (71%) were low. Statistical analyses indicated that CCR5 expression in primary CRC was associated with CRC patients' prognosis. Especially, stage III/IV patients with CCR5-high CRCs exhibited a significantly poorer prognosis than those with CCR5-low CRCs. Furthermore, we investigated the effects of preoperative serum CCR5 ligands on patients' prognosis (n = 114), and found that CRC patients with high serum levels of CCL3 and CCL4 exhibited a poorer prognosis compared to those with low levels of CCL3 and CCL4, while there was no association between CCL5 and prognosis. These results suggest that the inhibition of MSC-CRC interaction by a CCR5 inhibitor could provide the possibility of a novel therapeutic strategy for CRC, and that serum levels of CCL3 and CCL4 could be predictive biomarkers for the prognosis of CRC patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30890699
doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1508-2
pii: 10.1038/s41419-019-1508-2
pmc: PMC6424976
doi:
Substances chimiques
CCR5 protein, human
0
CCR5 protein, mouse
0
Chemokine CCL3
0
Chemokine CCL4
0
Chemokine CCL5
0
Culture Media, Conditioned
0
Receptors, CCR5
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
264Références
Br J Cancer. 2015 Sep 1;113(5):756-62
pubmed: 26270232
Cancer Res. 2012 Aug 1;72(15):3839-50
pubmed: 22637726
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec;12(12):732-42
pubmed: 26483297
J Proteomics. 2013 Dec 6;94:186-201
pubmed: 24080422
Cancer Cell. 2016 Apr 11;29(4):587-601
pubmed: 27070705
Br J Haematol. 2015 Dec;171(5):726-35
pubmed: 26358140
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 6;8(31):51024-51036
pubmed: 28881626
Cell Adh Migr. 2012 May-Jun;6(3):220-30
pubmed: 22863739
Cancer Res. 2018 Apr 1;78(7):1657-1671
pubmed: 29358169
Blood. 2011 Feb 3;117(5):1662-9
pubmed: 21115978
Int J Cancer. 2011 Nov 1;129(9):2183-93
pubmed: 21190185
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Oct 01;9:5447-68
pubmed: 26491256
J Surg Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;97(5):445-50
pubmed: 18297689
JAMA. 2006 Aug 16;296(7):815-26
pubmed: 16905787
Cancer Res. 1999 Sep 15;59(18):4681-7
pubmed: 10493525
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009 Sep 18;387(2):381-6
pubmed: 19607806
Thorac Cancer. 2018 Jul;9(7):775-784
pubmed: 29722145
Cell Death Dis. 2017 May 25;8(5):e2819
pubmed: 28542126
Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2013 Jun;34(6):747-54
pubmed: 23736003
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86
pubmed: 25220842
Oncogene. 2008 Jan 17;27(4):557-64
pubmed: 17653092
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28842
pubmed: 22205974
Front Oncol. 2015 Mar 23;5:63
pubmed: 25853091
N Engl J Med. 1986 Dec 25;315(26):1650-9
pubmed: 3537791
Nat Rev Cancer. 2006 May;6(5):392-401
pubmed: 16572188
Cytotherapy. 2013 Jul;15(7):753-9
pubmed: 23602595
Cancer Lett. 2016 Aug 1;378(1):23-32
pubmed: 27177471
J Clin Invest. 2013 Jan;123(1):189-205
pubmed: 23318994
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov;140(11):1835-48
pubmed: 24938433
Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 Apr;9(4):239-52
pubmed: 19279573
Nature. 2007 Oct 4;449(7162):557-63
pubmed: 17914389
CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Jul-Aug;62(4):220-41
pubmed: 22700443
Gastroenterology. 2011 Sep;141(3):1046-56
pubmed: 21699785
Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2013 Feb;9(1):65-79
pubmed: 22237468
Blood. 2012 Feb 2;119(5):1182-9
pubmed: 22180443
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Apr 1;13(7):2082-90
pubmed: 17404090
AIDS. 2016 Mar 27;30(6):869-78
pubmed: 26636929
Prostate. 2010 Nov 1;70(15):1709-15
pubmed: 20564322
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017 Jan;16(1):35-52
pubmed: 27811929
Cell Death Dis. 2018 Jan 18;9(2):25
pubmed: 29348540
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35101
pubmed: 22506069
Int J Cancer. 2010 Nov 15;127(10):2323-33
pubmed: 20473928
Cancer Treat Rev. 2013 Apr;39(2):180-8
pubmed: 22494966
Cell Tissue Kinet. 1970 Oct;3(4):393-403
pubmed: 5523063
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2016 Dec;25(12):1377-1392
pubmed: 27791451
J Immunol. 2008 Nov 1;181(9):6384-93
pubmed: 18941229
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 19;7(1):17837
pubmed: 29259202
Oncotarget. 2016 Jul 26;7(30):48335-48345
pubmed: 27340784
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010 Apr;25(4):417-24
pubmed: 20054600
Nat Commun. 2013;4:1795
pubmed: 23653207
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 May 16;19(5):
pubmed: 29772686
Gut. 2013 Apr;62(4):550-60
pubmed: 22535374
Stem Cells. 2009 Jun;27(6):1463-8
pubmed: 19492298
Cancer Cell. 2011 Feb 15;19(2):257-72
pubmed: 21316604