Generalizability is not optional: insights from a cross-cultural study of social discounting.

cross-cultural differences generalizability replication sample diversity social discounting

Journal

Royal Society open science
ISSN: 2054-5703
Titre abrégé: R Soc Open Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101647528

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Historique:
received: 21 08 2018
accepted: 05 02 2019
entrez: 21 3 2019
pubmed: 21 3 2019
medline: 21 3 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Current scientific reforms focus more on solutions to the problem of reliability (e.g. direct replications) than generalizability. Here, we use a cross-cultural study of social discounting to illustrate the utility of a complementary focus on generalizability across diverse human populations. Social discounting is the tendency to sacrifice more for socially close individuals-a phenomenon replicated across countries and laboratories. Yet, when adapting a typical protocol to low-literacy, resource-scarce settings in Bangladesh and Indonesia, we find no independent effect of social distance on generosity, despite still documenting this effect among US participants. Several reliability and validity checks suggest that methodological issues alone cannot explain this finding. These results illustrate why we must complement replication efforts with investment in strong checks on generalizability. By failing to do so, we risk developing theories of human nature that reliably explain behaviour among only a thin slice of humanity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30891268
doi: 10.1098/rsos.181386
pii: rsos181386
pmc: PMC6408392
doi:

Banques de données

figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4397651']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

181386

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

We have no competing interests.

Références

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan;9(1):59-71
pubmed: 26173241
Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Dec;28(6):795-815; discussion 815-55
pubmed: 16372952
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 08;9:1426
pubmed: 30135673
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Oct;162:31-38
pubmed: 28575664
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Sep;2(9):637-644
pubmed: 31346273
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 6;115(45):11366-11368
pubmed: 30397139
Judgm Decis Mak. 2011 Aug;6(6):552-564
pubmed: 22582110
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1:0021
pubmed: 33954258
Sci Adv. 2017 Oct 04;3(10):e1701381
pubmed: 28983511
Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Oct 25;41:e120
pubmed: 29065933
Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci. 2018 Dec;1(4):501-515
pubmed: 31886452
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 26;113(17):4688-93
pubmed: 27035959
Evol Anthropol. 2017 Apr;26(2):54-73
pubmed: 28429567
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Mar;100(3):407-25
pubmed: 21280961
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2607-2612
pubmed: 29531092
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40750
pubmed: 22848399
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135
pubmed: 20550733
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716
pubmed: 26315443
Annu Rev Psychol. 2018 Jan 4;69:511-534
pubmed: 29068778
Circ Res. 2015 Jan 2;116(1):116-26
pubmed: 25552691
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 3;112(5):1619-24
pubmed: 25605887
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 6;115(45):11428-11434
pubmed: 30397138
Psychol Bull. 1946 Jul;43:289-374
pubmed: 20992077
Hum Nat. 2017 Mar;28(1):76-91
pubmed: 27796826
PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124
pubmed: 16060722
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Jul;12(4):669-674
pubmed: 28727964
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 6;115(45):11401-11405
pubmed: 30397114
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):608-14
pubmed: 26168120
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):1123-1128
pubmed: 28853993
Psychol Sci. 2005 Jul;16(7):550-4
pubmed: 16008788
Nature. 2018 Jan 25;553(7689):399-401
pubmed: 29368721
Psychol Bull. 2020 May;146(5):451-479
pubmed: 31944796
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Mar;6(2):163-71
pubmed: 26162135
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Jul;4(4):435-9
pubmed: 26158991
Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66
pubmed: 22006061
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Jan;41:e124
pubmed: 31064512
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Oct;21(10):736-748
pubmed: 28803699
PLoS Med. 2014 Oct 21;11(10):e1001747
pubmed: 25334033
Am Psychol. 2008 Oct;63(7):602-14
pubmed: 18855491
Science. 2006 Jun 23;312(5781):1767-70
pubmed: 16794075
Psychol Sci. 2006 Apr;17(4):283-6
pubmed: 16623683
Science. 2016 Mar 25;351(6280):1433-6
pubmed: 26940865
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Jan 1;74(1):52-58
pubmed: 28383666
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 14;10(7):e0133078
pubmed: 26172452
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):779-804
pubmed: 18087943

Auteurs

Leonid Tiokhin (L)

School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Human Technology Interaction Group, Eindhoven University of Technology, IPO 1.24, PO Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Joseph Hackman (J)

School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.

Shirajum Munira (S)

LAMB Project for Integrated Health and Development, Parbatipur 5250, Bangladesh.

Khaleda Jesmin (K)

LAMB Project for Integrated Health and Development, Parbatipur 5250, Bangladesh.

Daniel Hruschka (D)

School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.

Classifications MeSH