A four-questions perspective on public information use in sticklebacks (Gasterosteidae).
cognition
foraging
social information
social learning
Journal
Royal Society open science
ISSN: 2054-5703
Titre abrégé: R Soc Open Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101647528
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
17
10
2018
accepted:
08
01
2019
entrez:
21
3
2019
pubmed:
21
3
2019
medline:
21
3
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Whether learning primarily reflects general processes or species-specific challenges is a long-standing matter of dispute. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of public information use (PI-use) in sticklebacks (Gasterosteidae). PI-use is a form of social learning by which animals are able to assess the relative quality of resources, here prey patches, by observing the behaviour of others. PI-use was highly specific with only
Identifiants
pubmed: 30891285
doi: 10.1098/rsos.181735
pii: rsos181735
pmc: PMC6408396
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4387985']
Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.0cq3rm5']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
181735Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
We have no competing interests to declare.
Références
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Oct 22;279(1745):4272-8
pubmed: 22896644
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Dec 12;5(12):181132
pubmed: 30662732
Zoology (Jena). 2007;110(5):369-76
pubmed: 17707619
Anim Behav. 2001 Jan;61(1):3-15
pubmed: 11170692
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Aug 30;284(1861):
pubmed: 28855361
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 May 7;271(1542):949-55
pubmed: 15255050
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 22;270(1531):2413-9
pubmed: 14667359
Learn Behav. 2004 Feb;32(1):4-14
pubmed: 15161136
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1994 May;69(2):207-31
pubmed: 8054445
Anim Cogn. 2007 Apr;10(2):259-66
pubmed: 17205290
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Aug 22;281(1789):20140579
pubmed: 25009061
J Comp Psychol. 2013 May;127(2):154-65
pubmed: 22946924
Am Nat. 2013 Feb;181(2):235-44
pubmed: 23348777
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 7;278(1712):1753-9
pubmed: 21068041
J Comp Psychol. 2012 May;126(2):193-202
pubmed: 21895355
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 22;278(1705):619-27
pubmed: 20826479
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009 Feb;50(2):401-4
pubmed: 19027080
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Sep;10(9):1095-102
pubmed: 17726475
Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Oct 1;5(10):426-433
pubmed: 11707381
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Dec 22;275(1653):2869-76
pubmed: 18755676
Ethology. 2012 Nov 1;118(11):1111-1121
pubmed: 23226911
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013 Jun;1289:18-35
pubmed: 23550583
PLoS Biol. 2011 Jul;9(7):e1001109
pubmed: 21811401
Am Nat. 2002 Dec;160(6):712-26
pubmed: 18707460
Science. 2004 Dec 10;306(5703):1903-7
pubmed: 15591194
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Feb 20;6(2):181735
pubmed: 30891285
Science. 2004 Jul 23;305(5683):487-91
pubmed: 15273386
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Jul;22(7):651-665
pubmed: 29759889
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Apr 12;366(1567):958-68
pubmed: 21357218
Sci Adv. 2017 May 03;3(5):e1602682
pubmed: 28508069
Trends Neurosci. 1992 Aug;15(8):298-303
pubmed: 1384199
Science. 1964 Dec 11;146(3650):1483-6
pubmed: 14208581
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 7;282(1802):
pubmed: 25608880
Biol Lett. 2010 Aug 23;6(4):466-8
pubmed: 20129948