The Dry Revolution: Evaluation of Three Different EEG Dry Electrode Types in Terms of Signal Spectral Features, Mental States Classification and Usability.
brain activity
dry electrodes
electroencephalography
frequency domain
machine-learning
mental workload
power spectral density
wearable devices
wet electrodes
Journal
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Titre abrégé: Sensors (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101204366
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Mar 2019
19 Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
24
01
2019
revised:
27
02
2019
accepted:
14
03
2019
entrez:
22
3
2019
pubmed:
22
3
2019
medline:
29
5
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
One century after the first recording of human electroencephalographic (EEG) signals, EEG has become one of the most used neuroimaging techniques. The medical devices industry is now able to produce small and reliable EEG systems, enabling a wide variety of applications also with no-clinical aims, providing a powerful tool to neuroscientific research. However, these systems still suffer from a critical limitation, consisting in the use of wet electrodes, that are uncomfortable and require expertise to install and time from the user. In this context, dozens of different concepts of EEG dry electrodes have been recently developed, and there is the common opinion that they are reaching traditional wet electrodes quality standards. However, although many papers have tried to validate them in terms of signal quality and usability, a comprehensive comparison of different dry electrode types from multiple points of view is still missing. The present work proposes a comparison of three different dry electrode types, selected among the main solutions at present, against wet electrodes, taking into account several aspects, both in terms of signal quality and usability. In particular, the three types consisted in gold-coated single pin, multiple pins and solid-gel electrodes. The results confirmed the great standards achieved by dry electrode industry, since it was possible to obtain results comparable to wet electrodes in terms of signals spectra and mental states classification, but at the same time drastically reducing the time of montage and enhancing the comfort. In particular, multiple-pins and solid-gel electrodes overcome gold-coated single-pin-based ones in terms of comfort.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30893791
pii: s19061365
doi: 10.3390/s19061365
pmc: PMC6470960
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Silver
3M4G523W1G
Gold
7440-57-5
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : European Commission
ID : 723386
Organisme : Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca
ID : BrainSafeDrive
Références
J Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Jan;16(1):14-39
pubmed: 10082089
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1999 Apr;29(2-3):169-95
pubmed: 10209231
Physiol Meas. 2000 May;21(2):271-83
pubmed: 10847194
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;74(1):9
pubmed: 12486257
Hum Factors. 2003 Fall;45(3):381-9
pubmed: 14702990
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
pubmed: 15102499
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Apr;116(4):799-806
pubmed: 15792889
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Aug;61(2):235-43
pubmed: 16338015
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 May;60(5):708-31
pubmed: 17455078
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007 May;78(5 Suppl):B231-44
pubmed: 17547324
Methods. 2008 Aug;45(4):279-88
pubmed: 18682293
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:5867-70
pubmed: 19164052
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:5871-5
pubmed: 19164053
Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 May;121(5):686-93
pubmed: 20097606
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2010;:630649
pubmed: 20148074
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010 Jul;57(7):1798-806
pubmed: 20442037
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011 May;58(5):1200-7
pubmed: 21193371
J Neural Eng. 2011 Apr;8(2):025008
pubmed: 21436526
Front Neurosci. 2011 May 26;5:53
pubmed: 21647345
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012 Mar;20(2):228-35
pubmed: 22180514
Neuroimage. 2012 Jun;61(2):371-85
pubmed: 22227136
Front Neurosci. 2012 May 07;6:60
pubmed: 22586362
Front Neurol. 2012 Jul 18;3:114
pubmed: 22826701
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Jul;44:58-75
pubmed: 23116991
Psychophysiology. 2013 Jun;50(6):570-82
pubmed: 23551082
Biomed Eng Online. 2013 Jun 25;12:56
pubmed: 23800158
Comput Biol Med. 2013 Dec;43(12):2186-95
pubmed: 24290935
Neuron. 2013 Dec 4;80(5):1112-28
pubmed: 24314724
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Sep;34(5):502-8
pubmed: 24697967
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014 Jul;115(3):119-34
pubmed: 24821400
Sensors (Basel). 2014 Jul 18;14(7):12847-70
pubmed: 25046013
Neurophysiol Clin. 2015 Mar;45(1):105-11
pubmed: 25648821
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2016 Oct;54(10):1503-13
pubmed: 26645694
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015 Aug;2015:7242-5
pubmed: 26737963
Prog Neurobiol. 1989;33(5-6):387-98
pubmed: 2695975
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 28;11(4):e0154236
pubmed: 27124558
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2016;2016:3795325
pubmed: 27313602
Prog Brain Res. 2016;228:295-328
pubmed: 27590973
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Oct 26;10:539
pubmed: 27833542
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 Aug;2016:981-984
pubmed: 28268488
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 Aug;2016:3187-3190
pubmed: 28268985
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 3;7(1):547
pubmed: 28373684
IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2017;10:250-263
pubmed: 28422665
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017 Jul;64(7):1431-1436
pubmed: 28436837
Front Neurosci. 2017 Jun 13;11:325
pubmed: 28659751
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017 Jul;2017:2470-2473
pubmed: 29060399
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017 Jul;2017:3228-3231
pubmed: 29060585
Physiol Meas. 2018 Aug 29;39(8):08TR02
pubmed: 30039806
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Aug 29;12:231
pubmed: 30210322
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Dec 18;12:509
pubmed: 30618686
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Feb 09;19(3):null
pubmed: 30744081
Science. 1969 Apr 18;164(3877):328-31
pubmed: 5776646
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 May;90(5):376-83
pubmed: 7514984
Mem Cognit. 1994 Jul;22(4):395-410
pubmed: 7934946
Biol Cybern. 1998 Jul;79(1):49-57
pubmed: 9742677