The role of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) patients evaluated using Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) Transient Elastography (TE): a tertiary referral center experience.
Adult
Aged
Cross-Sectional Studies
Disease Progression
Elasticity Imaging Techniques
/ methods
Female
Gastrointestinal Microbiome
Humans
Indonesia
Intestine, Small
/ diagnostic imaging
Liver Cirrhosis
/ pathology
Male
Middle Aged
Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
/ diagnostic imaging
Tertiary Care Centers
Young Adult
NAFLD
SIBO
Transient Elastography
Journal
BMC gastroenterology
ISSN: 1471-230X
Titre abrégé: BMC Gastroenterol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968547
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Mar 2019
20 Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
19
11
2018
accepted:
07
03
2019
entrez:
22
3
2019
pubmed:
22
3
2019
medline:
16
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an emerging disease, where it can progress to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and lead to liver cirrhosis or liver cancer. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) has been hypothesized to play an important role in NAFLD development and progression, however, there is still conflicting data about this phenomenon. Transient Elastography (TE) examination using controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) has been validated for liver disease progression assessment in NAFLD. It is non-invasive method and easy to perform in clinical practice. Therefore, we would like to know the role of SIBO in NAFLD and its possible impact on disease progression. A cross-sectional design study performed at outpatient's Hepatobiliary clinic at tertiary referral university hospital in Jakarta. All recruited study subjects based on inclusions criteria underwent laboratory examination, transabdominal ultrasound examination, CAP-TE 502 (by Echosens, France), and glucose hydrogen breath test (GHBT) using portable hydrogen breath test apparatus (Gastro+™ Gastrolyzer by Bedfont Scientific Ltd). Stool sample examination was performed using RT-PCR. This study recruited 160 subjects with median age of 58 (22-78) years and 108 (67.5%) of them are female. SIBO (65,5%), DM (70.8%), dyslipidemia (75.2%), obesity (76.6%), and metabolic syndrome (73%) were more prevalent in NAFLD than non-NAFLD population. Bivariate analysis showed no significant association between SIBO and NAFLD development (p = 0.191; PR 0.871; CI 95% [0.306-1.269]). SIBO was also not associated with significant hepatic steatosis (p = 0.951; PR = 0.951; CI 95% [0.452-2.239]) and fibrosis (p = 0.371; PR = 1.369; CI 95% [0.608-3.772]). However, the presence of central obesity has significantly associated with the presence of SIBO (p = 0.001; PR = 0.378; CI 95% [0.021-0.478]). Based on stool sample analysis from 60 NAFLD patients, there is a significant correlation using Spearmen test between the presence of Bacteroides and the stage of fibrosis (p .037). Further analysis between obese NAFLD patients and non-obese NAFLD patients showing that there is a significant decrease of Bifidobacteria (p .047) and Lactobacillus (p .038) in obese NAFLD patients and a tendency of increase Bacteroides in obese NAFLD patients (p .572). SIBO is not associated with NAFLD development and progression.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an emerging disease, where it can progress to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and lead to liver cirrhosis or liver cancer. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) has been hypothesized to play an important role in NAFLD development and progression, however, there is still conflicting data about this phenomenon. Transient Elastography (TE) examination using controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) has been validated for liver disease progression assessment in NAFLD. It is non-invasive method and easy to perform in clinical practice. Therefore, we would like to know the role of SIBO in NAFLD and its possible impact on disease progression.
METHODS
METHODS
A cross-sectional design study performed at outpatient's Hepatobiliary clinic at tertiary referral university hospital in Jakarta. All recruited study subjects based on inclusions criteria underwent laboratory examination, transabdominal ultrasound examination, CAP-TE 502 (by Echosens, France), and glucose hydrogen breath test (GHBT) using portable hydrogen breath test apparatus (Gastro+™ Gastrolyzer by Bedfont Scientific Ltd). Stool sample examination was performed using RT-PCR.
RESULTS
RESULTS
This study recruited 160 subjects with median age of 58 (22-78) years and 108 (67.5%) of them are female. SIBO (65,5%), DM (70.8%), dyslipidemia (75.2%), obesity (76.6%), and metabolic syndrome (73%) were more prevalent in NAFLD than non-NAFLD population. Bivariate analysis showed no significant association between SIBO and NAFLD development (p = 0.191; PR 0.871; CI 95% [0.306-1.269]). SIBO was also not associated with significant hepatic steatosis (p = 0.951; PR = 0.951; CI 95% [0.452-2.239]) and fibrosis (p = 0.371; PR = 1.369; CI 95% [0.608-3.772]). However, the presence of central obesity has significantly associated with the presence of SIBO (p = 0.001; PR = 0.378; CI 95% [0.021-0.478]). Based on stool sample analysis from 60 NAFLD patients, there is a significant correlation using Spearmen test between the presence of Bacteroides and the stage of fibrosis (p .037). Further analysis between obese NAFLD patients and non-obese NAFLD patients showing that there is a significant decrease of Bifidobacteria (p .047) and Lactobacillus (p .038) in obese NAFLD patients and a tendency of increase Bacteroides in obese NAFLD patients (p .572).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
SIBO is not associated with NAFLD development and progression.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30894137
doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-0960-x
pii: 10.1186/s12876-019-0960-x
pmc: PMC6427876
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
43Subventions
Organisme : Universitas Indonesia
ID : None
Références
Gut. 2001 Feb;48(2):206-11
pubmed: 11156641
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Jun;22(6):778-87
pubmed: 17565630
Obes Surg. 2008 Apr;18(4):371-7
pubmed: 18286348
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010 Nov;36(11):1825-35
pubmed: 20870345
Dig Dis Sci. 2011 May;56(5):1524-34
pubmed: 21046243
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011 Jul;17(3):312-7
pubmed: 21860825
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2007 Feb;3(2):112-22
pubmed: 21960820
Arq Gastroenterol. 2012 Jan-Mar;49(1):89-96
pubmed: 22481692
Hepatology. 2012 Jun;55(6):2005-23
pubmed: 22488764
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Apr;19(4):305-13
pubmed: 23452229
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 May;10(5):307-18
pubmed: 23458891
Nutrients. 2013 May 10;5(5):1544-60
pubmed: 23666091
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Nov;10(11):627-36
pubmed: 23958599
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Nov;10(11):686-90
pubmed: 24042449
Hepatol Res. 2015 Jan;45(1):20-8
pubmed: 24661406
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2013 Jul;1(1):19-26
pubmed: 24759663
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jan;31(1):213-21
pubmed: 26212089
Hepatology. 2016 Mar;63(3):764-75
pubmed: 26600078
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2015 Nov 15;6(4):110-9
pubmed: 26600968
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;10(2):215-27
pubmed: 26636484
J Hepatol. 2016 Jun;64(6):1388-402
pubmed: 27062661
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 10;11(6):e0157358
pubmed: 27284700
Caspian J Intern Med. 2016 Fall;7(4):242-252
pubmed: 27999641
United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Feb;5(1):76-85
pubmed: 28405325
Rom J Intern Med. 2018 Jun 1;56(2):85-89
pubmed: 29101772