A Comparative Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty With Optional Stenting and Femoropopliteal Bypass Surgery for Medium-Length TASC II B and C Femoropopliteal Lesions.


Journal

Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists
ISSN: 1545-1550
Titre abrégé: J Endovasc Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100896915

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2019
Historique:
entrez: 23 3 2019
pubmed: 23 3 2019
medline: 19 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To evaluate the total midterm costs and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with optional stenting (PTA/S) as initial treatment compared with femoropopliteal bypass (FPB) surgery in patients with medium-length TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC) B and C femoropopliteal lesions. Over a period of 3 years, all hospital health care costs for 226 consecutive patients were calculated: 170 patients with a TASC B lesion and 56 patients with a TASC C lesion. In the 135-patient PTA/S group (mean age 69.9±10.9 years; 83 men), 108 (63.5%) patients had TASC B lesions and 27 (48.2%) patients had TASC C lesions. Ninety-one patients (mean age 68.4±10.9 years; 60 men) were treated with FPB for 62 TASC B and 29 TASC C femoropopliteal lesions. The main outcome measure was the primary patency rate at 3-year follow-up. Multiple imputation and bootstrapping techniques were used to analyze the data. The adjusted incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated by dividing the difference in total costs by the difference in 3-year primary patency rate. Costs were expressed in euros (€), and cost differences are presented with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Mean total costs per patient were €29,058 in the PTA/S treatment group vs €42,437 in the FPB group (mean adjusted difference -€14,820, 95% CI -€29,044 to -€5976). Differences in 3-year primary patency between PTA/S and FPB were small and nonsignificant (68.9% and 70.3%, respectively). An ICER of 563,716 was found, indicating that FPB costs €563,716 more per one extra patient reaching 3-year primary patency in comparison with PTA/S treatment. FPB in medium-length femoropopliteal lesions involved higher total costs when evaluated over a 3-year follow-up period. An endovascular-first approach is recommended, as this will result in cost minimization for patients with medium-length femoropopliteal disease.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30898070
doi: 10.1177/1526602819833646
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

172-180

Auteurs

Rianne J Vossen (RJ)

1 Department of Vascular Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG) Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Pilar C Philipszoon (PC)

2 Department of Health Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Anco C Vahl (AC)

1 Department of Vascular Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG) Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
3 Clinical Epidemiology, OLVG Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Alexander D Montauban van Swijndregt (AD)

4 Department of Radiology, OLVG Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Vanessa J Leijdekkers (VJ)

1 Department of Vascular Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG) Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Ron Balm (R)

5 Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH