Does early removal of double J stents reduce urinary infection in living donor renal transplantation?
catheter
kidney transplantation
urinary tract infection
Journal
Archives of medical science : AMS
ISSN: 1734-1922
Titre abrégé: Arch Med Sci
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101258257
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
23
12
2017
accepted:
24
01
2018
entrez:
23
3
2019
pubmed:
23
3
2019
medline:
23
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prophylactic use of double J (DJ) stents in recipients is highly accepted in renal transplantation. In this study, the association between the frequency of urologic complications (UC) and urinary tract infections (UTI), and the early or late removal of DJ stents was investigated. A total of 116 live-donor renal transplant patients were included in the study during a 4-year period, with a mean follow-up of 29.2 ±15.3 months. In all, DJ stents were used. All patients were clinically monitored for graft function by assessment of the complete blood count, renal biochemistry, urine analysis and blood drug level according to our follow-up protocol. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the time of their stent removal: group I ( The results of our study demonstrated that DJ stent removal within 14 days did not reduce the risk of UTI when compared to stent removal after 14 days. Similar effects on complication rates for ureteral stenting for these 2 removal periods were observed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30899293
doi: 10.5114/aoms.2018.73524
pii: 31817
pmc: PMC6425203
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
402-407Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
J Urol. 2000 Sep;164(3 Pt 1):657-60
pubmed: 10953120
Transplantation. 2000 Aug 27;70(4):597-601
pubmed: 10972216
Am J Transplant. 2004 Nov;4(11):1889-96
pubmed: 15476491
Transplant Proc. 2005 Sep;37(7):3075-6
pubmed: 16213309
J Urol. 2007 Jun;177(6):2260-4; discussion 2264
pubmed: 17509336
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2509-13; discussion 2513
pubmed: 17937936
Transplant Proc. 2008 Jan-Feb;40(1):202-4
pubmed: 18261587
Transplant Proc. 2009 Jan-Feb;41(1):162-4
pubmed: 19249503
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1991 Sep;73(5):316-21
pubmed: 1929136
World J Surg. 2009 Dec;33(12):2722-6
pubmed: 19774409
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2010 Mar;21(2):310-3
pubmed: 20228519
Eur J Med Res. 2010;15:297-302
pubmed: 20696641
Indian J Urol. 2010 Jul;26(3):450-3
pubmed: 21116375
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2011 Jan;21(1):34-6
pubmed: 21276383
Transplant Proc. 2011 Apr;43(3):813-5
pubmed: 21486604
Transplant Proc. 2012 Apr;44(3):737-9
pubmed: 22483481
Transplant Proc. 2013 Apr;45(3):1099-101
pubmed: 23622636
Transplantation. 2013 Aug 27;96(4):400-5
pubmed: 23698597
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 17;(6):CD004925
pubmed: 23771708
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014;18(23):3551-6
pubmed: 25535122
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2015 May-Jun;26(3):443-6
pubmed: 26022012
Transplant Proc. 2016 Jun;48(5):1580-9
pubmed: 27496451
Transplant Proc. 2017 Mar;49(2):297-302
pubmed: 28219588
Transplant Proc. 2017 Apr;49(3):523-527
pubmed: 28340826
J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Jul;179(1):21-4
pubmed: 8019719