Psychosocial factors related with caregiver burden among families of children with chronic conditions.
Caregiver burden
Family caregivers
Family functioning
Family support
Pediatric chronic diseases
Psychosocial factors
Social support networks
Sociodemographic variables
Well-being
Journal
BioPsychoSocial medicine
ISSN: 1751-0759
Titre abrégé: Biopsychosoc Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101286572
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
29
11
2018
accepted:
21
02
2019
entrez:
23
3
2019
pubmed:
23
3
2019
medline:
23
3
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The impact of looking after children who live with complex chronic conditions is a growing public health issue. However, it is unclear whether sociodemographic and psychosocial variables can be used to predict the burden on the caregiver and how the profiles of families of children with chronic diseases are defined and structured. The objective of this study was to identify multivariate sociodemographic and psychosocial variables as well as sociocultural and familial factors to analyze the caregiver burden of family caregivers of children with chronic diseases. A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 416 family caregivers of children with chronic diseases at the National Institute of Health in Mexico City. The participants responded to a questionnaire on sociodemographic variables and a battery of 7 instruments that examined caregiver burden, family support, parental stress, anxiety, support networks, family functioning, historic-psycho-socio-cultural premises and the World Health Organization Well-Being Index A multivariate analysis using hierarchical multiple regression models showed that the variables included in the psychosocial and sociodemographic profile as a whole explained 40% of the variance in caregiver burden, taking sociocultural historical premises, stressors and anxiety into account as positive individual predictors. Negative individual predictors for caregiver burden included upper secondary education, social support networks, family support, family functioning and well-being. The sociodemographic profiles of family caregivers were as follows: female (81.7%); mean age, 31.7 years (standard deviation [SD], 8 years); married (79.3%); nuclear family (60%); basic education (62.7%); unpaid work (66.3%); and a daily household income of approximately 4 USD (61.1%). The caregiver burden of family caregivers of children with chronic diseases is defined and structured based on personal, family, and sociocultural factors. These features provide evidence to conduct research and implement intervention strategies with regard to families facing adversity, risk and vulnerability during a child's disease.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The impact of looking after children who live with complex chronic conditions is a growing public health issue. However, it is unclear whether sociodemographic and psychosocial variables can be used to predict the burden on the caregiver and how the profiles of families of children with chronic diseases are defined and structured. The objective of this study was to identify multivariate sociodemographic and psychosocial variables as well as sociocultural and familial factors to analyze the caregiver burden of family caregivers of children with chronic diseases.
METHODS
METHODS
A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 416 family caregivers of children with chronic diseases at the National Institute of Health in Mexico City. The participants responded to a questionnaire on sociodemographic variables and a battery of 7 instruments that examined caregiver burden, family support, parental stress, anxiety, support networks, family functioning, historic-psycho-socio-cultural premises and the World Health Organization Well-Being Index
RESULTS
RESULTS
A multivariate analysis using hierarchical multiple regression models showed that the variables included in the psychosocial and sociodemographic profile as a whole explained 40% of the variance in caregiver burden, taking sociocultural historical premises, stressors and anxiety into account as positive individual predictors. Negative individual predictors for caregiver burden included upper secondary education, social support networks, family support, family functioning and well-being. The sociodemographic profiles of family caregivers were as follows: female (81.7%); mean age, 31.7 years (standard deviation [SD], 8 years); married (79.3%); nuclear family (60%); basic education (62.7%); unpaid work (66.3%); and a daily household income of approximately 4 USD (61.1%).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The caregiver burden of family caregivers of children with chronic diseases is defined and structured based on personal, family, and sociocultural factors. These features provide evidence to conduct research and implement intervention strategies with regard to families facing adversity, risk and vulnerability during a child's disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30899323
doi: 10.1186/s13030-019-0147-2
pii: 147
pmc: PMC6407238
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
6Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
This research project, HIM/2013/019/SSA.1141, was approved by the Research, Ethics and Biosafety Commission [Comisiones de Investigación, Ética y Bioseguridad] of the Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez National Institute of Health. All participants signed an informed consent form.Consent to publish this study has been provided, and all participants have signed an informed consent form.The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The authors declare that we have no conflicts of interest. All of the authors have given their approval for the article to be published.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Références
J Child Health Care. 2016 Dec;20(4):494-502
pubmed: 27141084
Psychooncology. 2017 Oct;26(10):1555-1561
pubmed: 27321897
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2008 Jun;12(3):507-16
pubmed: 18515250
Biopsychosoc Med. 2018 Dec 12;12:20
pubmed: 30559833
Support Care Cancer. 2014 May;22(5):1277-86
pubmed: 24326951
Gerontologist. 1980 Dec;20(6):649-55
pubmed: 7203086
JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1052-60
pubmed: 24618967
BMC Psychol. 2019 Dec 21;7(1):85
pubmed: 31864414
Psychooncology. 2017 Jan;26(1):125-132
pubmed: 26489522
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 01;11(4):e0152778
pubmed: 27035912
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Dec 13;15(1):242
pubmed: 29237460
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Feb;22(2):503-11
pubmed: 24101152
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2013 Mar;22(2):188-95
pubmed: 22989256
Psychooncology. 2015 Mar;24(3):318-24
pubmed: 25113320
Psicothema. 2007 Nov;19(4):687-92
pubmed: 17959127
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2015 Jul-Aug;23(4):769-77
pubmed: 26444180
Acta Paediatr. 2016 Jan;105(1):e30-4
pubmed: 26426347
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2015 Jul-Aug;8(4):188-96
pubmed: 25707027
Psychother Psychosom. 1996;65(4):183-90
pubmed: 8843498
J Support Oncol. 2004 Mar-Apr;2(2):145-55
pubmed: 15328817
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Sep;34(3):294-304
pubmed: 17572056
J Child Health Care. 2012 Mar;16(1):26-52
pubmed: 22308543
Postgrad Med. 2000 Dec;108(7):119-23
pubmed: 11126138
Children (Basel). 2017 May 16;4(5):
pubmed: 28509853
Indian J Pediatr. 2015 Nov;82(11):1006-11
pubmed: 25976615
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0206917
pubmed: 30485299
Am Psychol. 2002 Dec;57(12):1060-73
pubmed: 12613157
Salud Publica Mex. 2008 Nov-Dec;50(6):516-22
pubmed: 19039441
Support Care Cancer. 2010 Feb;18(2):255-63
pubmed: 19609571
Gerontologist. 1986 Jun;26(3):260-6
pubmed: 3721233