Hippocampus subfield volumetry after microsurgical or endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms-an explorative study.
Intracranial aneurysm, Hippocampus, Magnetic resonance imaging, Radiology (interventional)
Journal
European radiology experimental
ISSN: 2509-9280
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol Exp
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101721752
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Mar 2019
21 Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
10
10
2018
accepted:
13
02
2019
entrez:
23
3
2019
pubmed:
23
3
2019
medline:
23
3
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To study hippocampus subfield volumes in patients after microsurgical clipping (MC) and/or endovascular coiling (EC) of intracranial aneurysms. Hippocampus subfield volumetry was performed using FreeSurfer v6.0 in 51 patients (35 females, mean age 54.9 ± 11.9 years, range 24-78 years). Visual inspection of image and segmentation quality was performed prior to statistical analyses. Multiple regression analysis, controlled for age, sex, and side of treatment, was used to assess the impact of prior MC and history of subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) on hippocampus subfield volumes (cornu ammonis (CA)-2/3, CA-4, subiculum). Partial correlation analyses were used to assess effect of multiple treatments on hippocampus subfield volumes. Prior MC was significantly associated with lower hippocampal subfield volumes in MC patients for right and left CA-2/3 (β = -22.32 [-40.18, -4.45]; p = 0.016 and β = -20.03 [-39.38, -0.68]; p = 0.043) and right CA-4 (β = -17.00 [-33.86, 0.12]; p = 0.048). History of SAH was not significantly associated with hippocampal subfield volumes. We observed a higher disease burden in the MC cohort. The number of aneurysms correlated with right-sided hippocampal subfield volumes while the number of treatment interventions did not. In this explorative study, we found that history of MC was significantly associated with lower volumes in distinct hippocampal subfields, which may be a consequence of a more extensive treatment. This could indicate specific atrophy of CA-2/3 after MC and should motivate hippocampal subfield assessment in larger cohorts.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To study hippocampus subfield volumes in patients after microsurgical clipping (MC) and/or endovascular coiling (EC) of intracranial aneurysms.
METHODS
METHODS
Hippocampus subfield volumetry was performed using FreeSurfer v6.0 in 51 patients (35 females, mean age 54.9 ± 11.9 years, range 24-78 years). Visual inspection of image and segmentation quality was performed prior to statistical analyses. Multiple regression analysis, controlled for age, sex, and side of treatment, was used to assess the impact of prior MC and history of subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) on hippocampus subfield volumes (cornu ammonis (CA)-2/3, CA-4, subiculum). Partial correlation analyses were used to assess effect of multiple treatments on hippocampus subfield volumes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Prior MC was significantly associated with lower hippocampal subfield volumes in MC patients for right and left CA-2/3 (β = -22.32 [-40.18, -4.45]; p = 0.016 and β = -20.03 [-39.38, -0.68]; p = 0.043) and right CA-4 (β = -17.00 [-33.86, 0.12]; p = 0.048). History of SAH was not significantly associated with hippocampal subfield volumes. We observed a higher disease burden in the MC cohort. The number of aneurysms correlated with right-sided hippocampal subfield volumes while the number of treatment interventions did not.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
In this explorative study, we found that history of MC was significantly associated with lower volumes in distinct hippocampal subfields, which may be a consequence of a more extensive treatment. This could indicate specific atrophy of CA-2/3 after MC and should motivate hippocampal subfield assessment in larger cohorts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30900111
doi: 10.1186/s41747-019-0092-7
pii: 10.1186/s41747-019-0092-7
pmc: PMC6428873
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
13Références
Neurology. 2001 Jun 26;56(12):1672-7
pubmed: 11425932
Neuron. 2002 Jan 31;33(3):341-55
pubmed: 11832223
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003 Oct;145(10):867-72; discussion 872
pubmed: 14577008
Neuroimage. 2004 Jul;22(3):1060-75
pubmed: 15219578
Neurology. 2006 Aug 22;67(4):575-82
pubmed: 16924007
Neurosurgery. 2007 Mar;60(3):434-41; discussion 441-2
pubmed: 17327787
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;24 Suppl 1:181-8
pubmed: 17971654
Neuroradiology. 2009 Nov;51(11):711-22
pubmed: 19568738
Stroke. 2010 Aug;41(8):e519-36
pubmed: 20595669
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 May;35(10):845-50
pubmed: 22909316
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35(2):93-112
pubmed: 23406828
J Neurosurg. 2014 Apr;120(4):937-44
pubmed: 24484231
J Neurol. 2014 Nov;261(11):2128-35
pubmed: 25119842
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Jan;8(1):24-9
pubmed: 25431306
World Neurosurg. 2015 Jun;83(6):1090-7
pubmed: 25535065
Neuroimage. 2015 Jul 15;115:117-37
pubmed: 25936807
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015 Jul;157(7):1135-45; discussion 1145
pubmed: 26007696
Br J Neurosurg. 2015;29(4):485-92
pubmed: 26037936
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Sep;36(9):3516-27
pubmed: 26043939
World Neurosurg. 2016 Oct;94:145-156
pubmed: 27392894
World Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;99:63-69
pubmed: 27913259
Depress Anxiety. 2017 May;34(5):401-409
pubmed: 28129464
Surg Neurol Int. 2017 Jan 19;8:11
pubmed: 28217390
J Neurosurg. 1968 Jan;28(1):14-20
pubmed: 5635959
Neuroimage. 1999 Feb;9(2):179-94
pubmed: 9931268