Cost of post-deployment screening for mental illness in the UK military: findings from a cluster randomised controlled trial.
Costs
economic evaluation
military
screening
Journal
Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England)
ISSN: 1360-0567
Titre abrégé: J Ment Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9212352
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
25
3
2019
medline:
24
1
2023
entrez:
24
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Little is known about the economic impact of military mental health screening. To investigate (a) whether post-deployment screening of military personnel affects use and cost of services and (b) the impact of psychiatric morbidity on costs. Participants were recruited from UK Royal Marine and Army platoons and randomised to an intervention group (which received tailored advice predicated upon mental health status) or a control group (which received general advice following assessment of mental health status). The intervention costs were calculated while service use and associated costs were assessed at 12-month follow-up. Data were available for 6323 participants. Mean screening cost was £34. Service costs were slightly higher in the control group compared to the intervention group (£1197 vs. £1147) which was not statistically significant (bootstrapped 95%CI, -£363 to £434. In both groups, screening and control, costs were significantly higher for those who screened positive for mental health problems. Costs were not affected by screening. In countries that have already implemented post-deployment screening, the political cost of disinvestment needs careful consideration. Those who develop psychiatric morbidity have substantially higher care costs than those who do not.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
UNASSIGNED
Little is known about the economic impact of military mental health screening.
AIMS
UNASSIGNED
To investigate (a) whether post-deployment screening of military personnel affects use and cost of services and (b) the impact of psychiatric morbidity on costs.
METHODS
UNASSIGNED
Participants were recruited from UK Royal Marine and Army platoons and randomised to an intervention group (which received tailored advice predicated upon mental health status) or a control group (which received general advice following assessment of mental health status). The intervention costs were calculated while service use and associated costs were assessed at 12-month follow-up.
RESULTS
UNASSIGNED
Data were available for 6323 participants. Mean screening cost was £34. Service costs were slightly higher in the control group compared to the intervention group (£1197 vs. £1147) which was not statistically significant (bootstrapped 95%CI, -£363 to £434. In both groups, screening and control, costs were significantly higher for those who screened positive for mental health problems.
CONCLUSIONS
UNASSIGNED
Costs were not affected by screening. In countries that have already implemented post-deployment screening, the political cost of disinvestment needs careful consideration. Those who develop psychiatric morbidity have substantially higher care costs than those who do not.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30902023
doi: 10.1080/09638237.2019.1581332
doi:
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM