Oncoplastic breast conservation occupies a niche between standard breast conservation and mastectomy - A population-based prospective audit in Scotland.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Breast Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Carcinoma, Lobular
/ diagnosis
Clinical Audit
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Mammaplasty
Mastectomy
/ methods
Mastectomy, Segmental
/ methods
Middle Aged
Morbidity
/ trends
Neoplasm Staging
Prospective Studies
Scotland
/ epidemiology
Young Adult
Breast conservation therapy
Breast reconstruction
Breast surgery
Mammaplasty
Mastectomy
Journal
European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
ISSN: 1532-2157
Titre abrégé: Eur J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8504356
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
27
10
2018
revised:
06
03
2019
accepted:
10
03
2019
pubmed:
25
3
2019
medline:
11
6
2020
entrez:
24
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The role of oncoplastic breast conservation (OBC) surgery is not fully defined in terms of whether it is equivalent to standard breast conservation (SBC), or more an alternative to mastectomy, or whether it occupies its own niche somewhere between the two. Therefore, we have carried out a population-based prospective audit of the current OBC practice in Scotland. All patients diagnosed with breast cancer in the whole of Scotland between 01/01/2014 and 31/12/2015 were prospectively recorded within the National Managed Clinical Networks databases. Patients treated with OBC were compared to patients who had SBC, mastectomy and mastectomy with immediate reconstruction (MIR). 8075 patients were included (OBC:217(2.7%); SBC:5241(64.9%); mastectomy:1907(23.6%); MIR:710(8.8%)). OBC patients were younger than SBC or mastectomy, but older than MIR (p < 0.0001). OBC patients were between SBC and mastectomy patients in terms of clinical and pathological tumour size (all p < 0.001), rates of lobular cancers (v.SBC:p = 0.015 and v.mastectomy:p < 0.001), high-grade tumours (v.SBC:p = 0.030 and v.mastectomy:p = 0.008), ER negative (v.SBC: p = 0.042) and HER-2 positive (v.SBC: p = 0.003) tumours, and nodal metastasis (v.mastectomy: p < 0.001). More OBC patients received (neo)adjuvant chemo- and hormonal therapy (p ≤ 0.001), adjuvant radiotherapy (p = 0.005), trastuzumab (p < 0.001) than SBC. More OBC patients presented through screening (v.mastectomy/MIR: p < 0.0001). Time to surgery from diagnosis was longer for OBC than SBC/mastectomy (p < 0.0001), but shorter than MIR (p = 0.007). This national audit demonstrates that OBC occupies its own niche between SBC, mastectomy and MIR in the surgical treatment of breast cancer in Scotland. We recommend that OBC should be recorded separately in other national breast cancer registries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30902354
pii: S0748-7983(19)30339-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.014
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1806-1811Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.