Prospective randomized comparative study on rivaroxaban and LMWH for prophylaxis of post-apheresis thrombosis in adoptive T cell immunotherapy cancer patients.
Cancer
Femoral vein thrombosis
Immunotherapy
Low molecular weight heparin
Rivaroxaban
Journal
Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis
ISSN: 1573-742X
Titre abrégé: J Thromb Thrombolysis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9502018
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
25
3
2019
medline:
14
8
2019
entrez:
24
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Autologous adoptive T cell immunotherapy has been recognized as an effective treatment for cancer patients. The initial qualified lymphocytes is the core element determining the immunotherapeutic outcomes clinically. Cell separator based apheresis procedure is an optimal procedure to collect adequate mono-nucleated lymphocytes to generate efficient ex vivo T cell expansions; however, potential catheter-associated femoral vein thrombosis at post-apheresis might rise an additional deteriorated morbidity for cancer patients. The emerging prophylactic medications are required at such circumstances. Therefore this study was designed to compare the prophylactic effects of rivaroxaban versus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients who had exposed during the femoral vein catheterization for apheresis. 74 Patients were randomized 1:1:1 into three groups: subcutaneous injection of LMWH, Fraxiparine (n = 23) (0.4 ml, 3800 IU/day) for 2 days, oral rivaroxaban 10 mg/d (n = 26), and oral rivaroxaban 20 mg/d (n = 25) for consecutive 2 days. The primary endpoint was to compare the venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurrence cases in one month post catheterization. There were 4 cases confirmed VTE occurrence in LMWH group with contrast to 1 case in rivaroxaban 10 mg administration group. None was seen in rivaroxaban 20 mg group (P = 0.02 as the comparison with LMWH). Meantime there was no bleeding events occurrence afterwards. Oral rivaroxaban 20 mg/day was recommendable to be considered which superior to LMWH. Although these limited data and patient volume reached the statistical difference which was able to provide the evidence proofed to compare the potency of those two anticoagulants, it could be regarded as the preliminary data provide the clinical results for cancer patients who were placed in the condition of apheresis and subsequently undergone adoptive T cell immunotherapy.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03282643. Registered 16 February 2016, http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov/ NCT03282643.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30903459
doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01844-7
pii: 10.1007/s11239-019-01844-7
doi:
Substances chimiques
Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight
0
Rivaroxaban
9NDF7JZ4M3
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03282643']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Pagination
505-511Références
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Sep;18(17):3078-83
pubmed: 10963635
Chest. 2008 Aug;134(2):474
pubmed: 18756611
Chest. 2010 Oct;138(4):803-10
pubmed: 20923799
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 23;363(26):2499-510
pubmed: 21128814
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 5;366(14):1287-97
pubmed: 22449293
Oncol Lett. 2013 Apr;5(4):1427-1429
pubmed: 23599807
N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 29;369(9):799-808
pubmed: 23808982
Thromb J. 2013 Jul 03;11(1):11
pubmed: 23822763
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 10;369(15):1406-15
pubmed: 23991658
Circulation. 2014 Feb 18;129(7):764-72
pubmed: 24344086
J Thromb Haemost. 2014 May;12(5):796-800
pubmed: 24548519
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2014 Sep;63(9):939-46
pubmed: 24916038
Expert Rev Hematol. 2014 Oct;7(5):599-616
pubmed: 25174434
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2014 Dec 04;8:129-37
pubmed: 25520567
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar 21;23(11):1954-1963
pubmed: 28373761
Expert Rev Hematol. 2017 Nov;10(11):941-949
pubmed: 28829203
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 15;378(7):615-624
pubmed: 29231094
J Urol. 2018 Sep;200(3):520-527
pubmed: 29709665
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 10;36(20):2017-2023
pubmed: 29746227