Usefulness of Blood Pressure Variability Indices Derived From 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Detecting Autonomic Failure.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Autonomic Nervous System Diseases
/ diagnosis
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory
/ methods
Case-Control Studies
Diabetic Neuropathies
/ diagnosis
Dysautonomia, Familial
/ diagnosis
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple System Atrophy
/ complications
Parkinson Disease
/ complications
Primary Dysautonomias
/ diagnosis
Pure Autonomic Failure
/ diagnosis
Sensitivity and Specificity
ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
autonomic function
blood pressure variability
hypertension
labile hypertension
orthostatic hypotension
Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
ISSN: 2047-9980
Titre abrégé: J Am Heart Assoc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580524
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 04 2019
02 04 2019
Historique:
entrez:
26
3
2019
pubmed:
25
3
2019
medline:
7
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background Increased blood pressure ( BP ) variability and nondipping status seen on 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring are often observed in autonomic failure ( ATF ). Methods and Results We assessed BP variability and nocturnal BP dipping in 273 patients undergoing ambulatory BP monitoring at Southwestern Medical Center between 2010 and 2017. SD , average real variability, and variation independent of mean were calculated from ambulatory BP monitoring. Patients were divided into a discovery cohort (n=201) and a validation cohort (n=72). ATF was confirmed by formal autonomic function test. In the discovery cohort, 24-hour and nighttime average real variability, SD , and variation independent of mean did not differ significantly between ATF (n=25) and controls (n=176, all P>0.05). However, daytime SD, daytime coefficient of variation, and daytime variation independent of mean of systolic BP ( SBP ) were all significantly higher in patients with ATF than in controls in both discovery and validation cohorts. Nocturnal BP dipping was more blunted in ATF patients than controls in both cohorts (both P<0.01). Using the threshold of 16 mm Hg, daytime SD SBP yielded a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 82% in detecting ATF in the validation cohort, whereas nondipping status had a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 44%. The area under the receiver operator characteristic of daytime SD SBP was greater than the area under the receiver operator characteristic of nocturnal SBP dipping (0.79 [0.66-0.91] versus 0.73 [0.58-0.87], respectively). Conclusions Daytime SD of SBP is a better screening tool than nondipping status in detecting autonomic dysfunction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30905258
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010161
pmc: PMC6509738
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e010161Subventions
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : R03 ES026397
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : T32 DK007257
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : P30 DK079328
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA142543
Pays : United States
Références
Transplantation. 2001 May 15;71(9):1277-81
pubmed: 11397962
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Apr 5;6(4):
pubmed: 28381465
Clin Auton Res. 1991 Dec;1(4):309-15
pubmed: 1822265
Stroke. 2015 Sep;46(9):2482-90
pubmed: 26243226
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Apr 2;8(7):e010161
pubmed: 30905258
Clin Exp Hypertens A. 1985;7(2-3):187-94
pubmed: 4039991
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1984 Jul-Aug;11(4):347-50
pubmed: 6518664
Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Jun;134(3):279-86
pubmed: 21664375
Clin Hypertens. 2017 Mar 15;23:3
pubmed: 28331633
J Hypertens. 2005 Mar;23(3):505-11
pubmed: 15716690
J Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Jan;10(1):14-27
pubmed: 8458992
Hypertension. 2009 Feb;53(2):363-9
pubmed: 19047577
Circ J. 2012;76(2):508-19
pubmed: 22230784
Cancer. 1950 Jan;3(1):32-5
pubmed: 15405679
Clin Sci (Lond). 2001 Dec;101(6):609-18
pubmed: 11724647
PM R. 2009 Jan;1(1):14-22
pubmed: 19627868
Blood Press Monit. 1996 Feb;1(1):3-11
pubmed: 10226196
Lancet. 2010 Mar 13;375(9718):895-905
pubmed: 20226988
Hypertension. 2007 Jun;49(6):1265-70
pubmed: 17452502
Hypertension. 2000 Nov;36(5):901-6
pubmed: 11082164
J Hypertens. 2015 Mar;33(3):454-7
pubmed: 25629359
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 17;163(10):778-86
pubmed: 26458123
J Clin Neurol. 2015 Jul;11(3):220-6
pubmed: 26174784
Mayo Clin Proc. 1993 Aug;68(8):748-52
pubmed: 8392653
J Hypertens. 2014 Jul;32(7):1359-66
pubmed: 24886823
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013 Mar;10(3):143-55
pubmed: 23399972
Circulation. 2005 Feb 8;111(5):697-716
pubmed: 15699287
Clin Auton Res. 2017 Jun;27(3):167-173
pubmed: 28243824
Am J Med Sci. 2007 Jul;334(1):61-4
pubmed: 17630595
J Hum Hypertens. 2007 May;21(5):381-6
pubmed: 17301823
Hypertension. 2010 Apr;55(4):1049-57
pubmed: 20212270
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 Jul;19(7):713-721
pubmed: 28692165
Circulation. 1983 Sep;68(3):477-83
pubmed: 6872160
J Hypertens. 2013 Sep;31(9):1731-68
pubmed: 24029863
Muscle Nerve. 2017 Jan;55(1):3-4
pubmed: 27786371