Outcomes of Surgical Repair of Skull Base Defects Following Endonasal Pituitary Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study.

CSF leak Duragen Fibrin glue Nasoseptal flap Pituitary adenoma Surgicel

Journal

Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India
ISSN: 2231-3796
Titre abrégé: Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Pays: India
ID NLM: 9422551

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Historique:
received: 25 06 2018
accepted: 09 10 2018
entrez: 26 3 2019
pubmed: 25 3 2019
medline: 25 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Skull base defects following endonasal surgery for pituitary macroadenoma need to be addressed during the surgery to prevent serious postoperative complications like cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. The objective of this study is to assess the incidence of CSF leak following pituitary surgery and the methods of effective skull base repair. This is a retrospective observational study conducted in a tertiary care hospital after obtaining due clearance from the Institutional ethics committee. The charts of patients who underwent endonasal pituitary surgery between 2013 and 2018 were studied and details noted. Patients undergoing revision surgery or with history of preoperative radiotherapy were excluded from the study. 52 patients were included in the study. Based on the type of CSF leak, the patients were grouped into four. 19 patients (36.5%) had an intraoperative CSF leak. 3 patients developed a postoperative CSF leak. Based on the histopathology, 4 patients had ACTH secreting tumor. 8 patients had growth hormone secreting tumor, 22 had gonadotropin secreting tumor, 9 patients had a non-functioning tumour and 9 patients had prolactinoma. The type of skull base repair performed in these patients were grouped into 4.18 patients underwent type I repair, 21 patients underwent type II repair, 8 patients underwent type III repair and 5 patients underwent type IV repair. We have observed that the pedicled nasoseptal flap is particularly advantageous over other repair techniques, especially in low pressure leaks. The strategy for skull base repair should be tailored to suit each patient to minimise the occurrence of morbidity and the duration of hospital stay.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30906716
doi: 10.1007/s12070-018-1511-4
pii: 1511
pmc: PMC6401034
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

66-70

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Références

Laryngoscope. 2000 Jul;110(7):1166-72
pubmed: 10892690
Laryngoscope. 2003 Aug;113(8):1283-8
pubmed: 12897546
Medicina (Kaunas). 2008;44(4):302-7
pubmed: 18469507
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Apr;30(4):781-6
pubmed: 19213828
Skull Base. 2008 Nov;18(6):385-94
pubmed: 19412408
Laryngoscope. 2011 May;121(5):990-3
pubmed: 21520113
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jun;26(4):1261-4
pubmed: 26080170
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2016 Jun;77(3):271-8
pubmed: 27175324
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2017 Aug;37(4):303-307
pubmed: 28872159
J Cell Mol Med. 2018 Mar;22(3):2023-2027
pubmed: 29314715

Auteurs

Preethi Umamaheswaran (P)

1Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600116 India.

Visvanathan Krishnaswamy (V)

2Department of Neurosurgery, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600116 India.

Ganesh Krishnamurthy (G)

2Department of Neurosurgery, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600116 India.

Sanjeev Mohanty (S)

1Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600116 India.

Classifications MeSH