When Are Adverse Outcome Pathways and Associated Assays "Fit for Purpose" for Regulatory Decision-Making and Management of Chemicals?
Adverse outcome pathway
Chemical decision making
Defined approaches
Fit for purpose
Regulatory science
Journal
Integrated environmental assessment and management
ISSN: 1551-3793
Titre abrégé: Integr Environ Assess Manag
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101234521
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
29
08
2018
revised:
07
01
2019
accepted:
22
03
2019
pubmed:
26
3
2019
medline:
14
11
2019
entrez:
26
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There have been increasing demands for chemical hazard and risk assessments in recent years. Chemical companies have expanded internal product stewardship initiatives, and jurisdictions have increased the regulatory requirements for the manufacture and sale of chemicals. There has also been a shift in chemical toxicity evaluations within the same time frame, with new methodologies being developed to improve chemical safety assessments for both human health and the environment. With increased needs for chemical assessments coupled with more diverse data streams from new technologies, regulators and others tasked with chemical management activities are faced with increasing workloads and more diverse types of data to consider. The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework can be applied in different scenarios to integrate data and guide chemical assessment and management activities. In this paper, scenarios of how AOPs can be used to guide chemical management decisions during research and development, chemical registration, and subsequent regulatory activities such as prioritization and risk assessment are considered. Furthermore, specific criteria (e.g., the type and level of AOP complexity, confidence in the AOP, as well as external review and assay validation) are proposed to examine whether AOPs and associated tools are fit for purpose when applied in different contexts. Certain toxicity pathways are recommended as priority areas for AOP research and development, and the continued use of AOPs and defined approaches in regulatory activities are recommended. Furthermore, a call for increased outreach, education, and enhanced use of AOP databases is proposed to increase their utility in chemicals management. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2019;15:633-647. © 2019 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
Identifiants
pubmed: 30908812
doi: 10.1002/ieam.4153
pmc: PMC6771501
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hazardous Substances
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
633-647Subventions
Organisme : funding support from the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, United States Environmental Protection Agency, American Cleaning Institute, Cefic-LRI (European Chemical Industry Council Long-Range Research Initiative), Chevron-Environmental, ECETOC (European Center for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals), European Commission Joint Research Centre, European Crop Protection, ExxonMobil, Health and Environmental Sciences Institute, Humane Society International, The Humane Society
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
Références
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2016 Jan;356(1):170-81
pubmed: 26537250
Neurotoxicology. 2014 Sep;44:204-17
pubmed: 24997244
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Aug 1;44(15):5979-85
pubmed: 20602530
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Apr 15;584-585:751-775
pubmed: 28126277
Toxicol Sci. 2018 Apr 1;162(2):570-581
pubmed: 29228274
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2018 Jun;37(6):1723-1733
pubmed: 29488651
JAMA. 2017 May 9;317(18):1854-1863
pubmed: 28492899
J Health Econ. 2016 May;47:20-33
pubmed: 26928437
ALTEX. 2002;19(2):73-8
pubmed: 12098013
Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Dec;106(12):775-92
pubmed: 9831538
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Dec;70(3):629-40
pubmed: 25261300
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2010 Mar;29(3):730-41
pubmed: 20821501
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2016 Mar;35(3):513-25
pubmed: 26923854
Toxicol Sci. 2013 Jan;131(1):139-52
pubmed: 22923492
Toxicol Sci. 2015 Nov;148(1):14-25
pubmed: 26500288
Water Res. 2017 Oct 15;123:734-750
pubmed: 28728110
Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(3):1940-56
pubmed: 24369993
Toxicol Sci. 2014 Dec;142(2):312-20
pubmed: 25466378
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Sep 01;125(9):096001
pubmed: 28934726
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Jun;25(6):345-53
pubmed: 20188434
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017 Jun;36(6):1411-1421
pubmed: 28543973
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Jan;13(1):17-37
pubmed: 27243906
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Aug;72(3):514-37
pubmed: 25863193
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 May 1;52(9):5417-5426
pubmed: 29611697
Pest Manag Sci. 2017 Apr;73(4):672-677
pubmed: 27753242
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;76:39-50
pubmed: 26774756
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2016 Nov;35(11):2637-2646
pubmed: 27779828
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jul 1;628-629:1542-1556
pubmed: 30045572
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Apr;71(3):463-77
pubmed: 25707856
Toxicol In Vitro. 2011 Sep;25(6):1231-6
pubmed: 21624455
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2018 Jun;37(6):1734-1748
pubmed: 29492998