Aberrant p53 Immunostaining in Barrett's Esophagus Predicts Neoplastic Progression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.
Adenocarcinoma
/ diagnosis
Barrett Esophagus
/ diagnosis
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ analysis
Case-Control Studies
Disease Progression
Esophageal Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Humans
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Staining and Labeling
/ methods
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
/ analysis
Barrett’s esophagus
Biomarker
Esophageal adenocarcinoma
Immunohistochemistry
p53
Journal
Digestive diseases and sciences
ISSN: 1573-2568
Titre abrégé: Dig Dis Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7902782
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
received:
14
11
2018
accepted:
08
03
2019
pubmed:
27
3
2019
medline:
20
9
2019
entrez:
27
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Risk stratification of patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) presently relies on the histopathologic grade of dysplasia found in esophageal biopsies, which is limited by sampling error and inter-pathologist variability. p53 immunostaining of BE biopsies has shown promise as an adjunct tool but is not recommended by American gastroenterology societies, who cite insufficient evidence of its prognostic value. We have conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses to clarify this value. We searched for studies that: (1) used immunohistochemistry to assess p53 expression in esophageal biopsies of BE patients and (2) reported subsequent neoplastic progression. We performed separate meta-analyses of case-control studies and cohort studies. We identified 14 relevant reports describing 8 case-control studies comprising 1435 patients and 7 cohort studies comprising 582 patients. In the case-control study meta-analysis of the risk of neoplasia with aberrant p53 expression, the fixed- and random-effect estimates of average effect size with aberrant p53 expression were OR 3.84, p < .001 (95% CI 2.79-5.27) and OR 5.95, p < .001 (95% CI 2.68-13.22), respectively. In the cohort study meta-analysis, the fixed- and random-effect estimates of average effect size were RR = 17.31, p < .001 (95% CI 9.35-32.08) and RR = 14.25, p < .001 (95% CI 6.76-30.02), respectively. Separate meta-analyses of case-control and cohort studies of BE patients who had baseline biopsies with p53 immunostaining revealed consistent, strong, and significant associations between aberrant p53 immunostaining and progression to high-grade dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma. These findings support the use of p53 immunostaining as an adjunct to routine clinical diagnosis for dysplasia in BE patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30911864
doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05586-7
pii: 10.1007/s10620-019-05586-7
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1089-1097Références
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2016 Nov;4(4):304-309
pubmed: 26486567
Gastroenterology. 2004 Oct;127(4):1233-8
pubmed: 15481000
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Oct;96(10):2839-48
pubmed: 11693316
Cancer Res. 2009 May 15;69(10):4112-5
pubmed: 19435894
Cancer Biomark. 2008;4(1):1-10
pubmed: 18334729
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul;105(7):1523-30
pubmed: 20461069
Dig Dis Sci. 1997 Dec;42(12):2453-62
pubmed: 9440619
Gastroenterology. 2016 Nov;151(5):822-835
pubmed: 27702561
Pathology. 1998 May;30(2):136-40
pubmed: 9643490
N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 13;365(15):1375-83
pubmed: 21995385
N Engl J Med. 2009 May 28;360(22):2277-88
pubmed: 19474425
Gastroenterology. 2012 Oct;143(4):927-35.e3
pubmed: 22771507
Gut. 2016 Oct;65(10):1602-10
pubmed: 26104750
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1999 Dec;123(12):1260-3
pubmed: 10583932
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 23;12(10):e0186305
pubmed: 29059206
Histopathology. 2017 Jul;71(1):27-33
pubmed: 28226185
Cancer Res. 2004 Oct 15;64(20):7629-33
pubmed: 15492292
Gastroenterology. 2018 Jul;155(1):156-167
pubmed: 29608884
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Jun;19(6):1468-70
pubmed: 20501776
Gut. 2018 Jul;67(7):1229-1238
pubmed: 28642331
Oncogene. 2005 Jun 9;24(25):4138-48
pubmed: 15824739
Br J Surg. 2017 Apr;104(5):493-502
pubmed: 28295252
Histopathology. 2010 Dec;57(6):933-5
pubmed: 21166706
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Aug 16;92(16):1316-21
pubmed: 10944553
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 May;40(5):e45-66
pubmed: 26813745
Gastroenterology. 2011 Mar;140(3):1084-91
pubmed: 21376940
Gastroenterology. 1988 Jan;94(1):81-90
pubmed: 3335302
Gut. 2013 Dec;62(12):1676-83
pubmed: 23256952
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005 Mar;40(3):259-63
pubmed: 15932166
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;111(1):30-50; quiz 51
pubmed: 26526079
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2015 Feb;54(2):82-90
pubmed: 25284618
Am J Surg. 1994 Jan;167(1):52-7
pubmed: 8311140
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Mar;85(3):482-495.e4
pubmed: 27670227
Gut. 2014 Jan;63(1):7-42
pubmed: 24165758
Gut. 2006 Oct;55(10):1390-7
pubmed: 16682429
Endoscopy. 2013 Dec;45(12):983-8
pubmed: 24019132
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 May;96(5):1355-62
pubmed: 11374668
Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Oct;97(10):2508-13
pubmed: 12385431
Gastroenterology. 1993 Dec;105(6):1637-42
pubmed: 8253340
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Dec;76(6):1087-94
pubmed: 23164510
Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Apr;92(4):586-91
pubmed: 9128304
Dig Dis Sci. 1997 Apr;42(4):697-701
pubmed: 9125634