Perception of action-outcomes is shaped by life-long and contextual expectations.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 03 2019
Historique:
received: 22 11 2018
accepted: 26 02 2019
entrez: 28 3 2019
pubmed: 28 3 2019
medline: 2 10 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The way humans perceive the outcomes of their actions is strongly colored by their expectations. These expectations can develop over different timescales and are not always complementary. The present work examines how long-term (structural) expectations - developed over a lifetime - and short-term (contextual) expectations jointly affect perception. In two studies, including a pre-registered replication, participants initiated the movement of an ambiguously rotating sphere by operating a rotary switch. In the absence of any learning, participants predominantly perceived the sphere to rotate in the same direction as their rotary action. This bias toward structural expectations was abolished (but not reversed) when participants were exposed to incompatible action-effect contingencies (e.g., clockwise actions causing counterclockwise percepts) during a preceding learning phase. Exposure to compatible action-effect contingencies, however, did not add to the existing structural bias. Together, these findings reveal that perception of action-outcomes results from the combined influence of both long-term and immediate expectations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30914745
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41090-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-41090-8
pmc: PMC6435663
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

5225

Références

Nat Neurosci. 2004 Oct;7(10):1057-8
pubmed: 15361877
Neural Netw. 1998 Oct;11(7-8):1317-29
pubmed: 12662752
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2018 May;71(2):229-261
pubmed: 28857129
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
pubmed: 9176953
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
pubmed: 9176952
J Vis. 2016 Nov 1;16(14):6
pubmed: 27829105
Curr Biol. 2004 Jun 8;14(11):1013-7
pubmed: 15182676
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Jul;10(7):817-8
pubmed: 17529986
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Feb;146(2):182-193
pubmed: 28134542
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Feb;36(2):943-59
pubmed: 22108008
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Sep;2(9):661-70
pubmed: 11533734
Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Jul;3(7):254-264
pubmed: 10377540
Brain Struct Funct. 2013 May;218(3):611-43
pubmed: 23129312
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Dec;34(6):1493-500
pubmed: 19045988
Curr Biol. 2008 Aug 26;18(16):R697-8
pubmed: 18727901
Vision Res. 2000;40(8):925-30
pubmed: 10720663
Neurosci Conscious. 2018 Apr 17;2018(1):niy004
pubmed: 30042857
Neural Netw. 1996 Nov;9(8):1265-1279
pubmed: 12662535
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):128-142
pubmed: 28251595
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000 Dec 29;355(1404):1771-88
pubmed: 11205340
Curr Biol. 2001 Sep 18;11(18):R729-32
pubmed: 11566114
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):632-8
pubmed: 26168122
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Feb;22(2):233-40
pubmed: 15653296
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 29;7:1272
pubmed: 27621713
Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Oct;24(5):849-78; discussion 878-937
pubmed: 12239891
Psychol Sci. 2007 Jan;18(1):6-7
pubmed: 17362369
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Apr;13(2):304-9
pubmed: 16892999
J Vis. 2015;15(9):10
pubmed: 26200891
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Sep;12(9):334-41
pubmed: 18684661
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2019 May;72(2):219-243
pubmed: 30345637
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Aug;11(8):349-55
pubmed: 17629544
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1303-1309
pubmed: 27631989
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Sep;22(9):764-779
pubmed: 30122170
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Aug;181(3):395-408
pubmed: 17437093
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Mar;184:46-63
pubmed: 28478953
Curr Biol. 2011 Nov 8;21(21):R883-4
pubmed: 22075425
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Aug;44(8):1186-1198
pubmed: 29683716
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Oct 24;7:668
pubmed: 24187536
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Sep;18(9):451-6
pubmed: 24909775
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Jun;36(3):181-204
pubmed: 23663408
Psychol Methods. 2019 Oct;24(5):539-556
pubmed: 30742472
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Apr;21(2):301-8
pubmed: 24659049
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 25;7:610
pubmed: 24093017

Auteurs

Myrthel Dogge (M)

Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.dogge@uu.nl.

Ruud Custers (R)

Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Surya Gayet (S)

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Herbert Hoijtink (H)

Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Henk Aarts (H)

Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH