Progress toward Equitably Managed Protected Areas in Aichi Target 11: A Global Survey.

Aichi Target 11 access to justice decision-making rights

Journal

Bioscience
ISSN: 0006-3568
Titre abrégé: Bioscience
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0231737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Mar 2019
Historique:
entrez: 28 3 2019
pubmed: 28 3 2019
medline: 28 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Convention on Biological Diversity Aichi Target 11 requires its 193 signatory parties to incorporate social equity into protected area (PA) management by 2020. However, there is limited evidence of progress toward this commitment. We surveyed PA managers, staff, and community representatives involved in the management of 225 PAs worldwide to gather information against 10 equity criteria, including the distribution of benefits and burdens, recognition of rights, diversity of cultural and knowledge systems, and processes of participation in decision-making. Our results show that more than half of the respondents indicated that there are still significant challenges to be addressed in achieving equitably managed PAs, particularly in ensuring effective participation in decision-making, transparent procedures, access to justice in conflicting situations, and the recognition of the rights and diversity of local people. Our findings are a first and fundamental contribution toward a global assessment of equitable management in PAs to report on Aichi Target 11 in 2020 and help define the next set of PA targets from 2020-2030.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30914829
doi: 10.1093/biosci/biy143
pii: biy143
pmc: PMC6429033
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

191-197

Références

Science. 2004 Nov 12;306(5699):1146-9
pubmed: 15539593
Environ Manage. 2010 Nov;46(5):685-98
pubmed: 20859627
Conserv Biol. 2011 Apr;25(2):259-64
pubmed: 21091769
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 26;109(52):21265-70
pubmed: 23236173
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 5;370(1681):null
pubmed: 26460133
Conserv Biol. 2016 Jun;30(3):582-92
pubmed: 26801337
Nat Commun. 2016 Jul 28;7:12306
pubmed: 27465407
Conserv Biol. 2018 Apr;32(2):294-303
pubmed: 28861904

Auteurs

Noelia Zafra-Calvo (N)

Center for Macroecology, Evolution, and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), Parque Científico de UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain.

Eneko Garmendia (E)

Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), Parque Científico de UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain.
Department of Applied Economics I, University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.

Unai Pascual (U)

Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), Parque Científico de UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain.
Ikerbasque, the Basque Science Foundation, Bilbao, Spain.
Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Ignacio Palomo (I)

Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), Parque Científico de UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain.
Social-Ecological Systems Laboratory, Department of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.

Nicole Gross-Camp (N)

School of International Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.

Daniel Brockington (D)

Sheffield Institute for International Development, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Jose-Antonio Cortes-Vazquez (JA)

Department of Sociology and Communication Sciences, Universidade da Coruña, Spain.

Brendan Coolsaet (B)

School of International Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
European School of Political and Social Sciences, Lille Catholic University, Lille, France.

Neil David Burgess (ND)

Center for Macroecology, Evolution, and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
United Nations Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH