Probing for Intentions: Why Clocks Do Not Provide the Only Measurement of Time.

EEG ERD RP action awareness intention movement probe

Journal

Frontiers in human neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5161
Titre abrégé: Front Hum Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477954

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 26 07 2018
accepted: 11 02 2019
entrez: 28 3 2019
pubmed: 28 3 2019
medline: 28 3 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Having an intention to act is commonly operationalized as the moment at which awareness of an urge or decision to act arises. Measuring this moment has been challenging due to the dependence on first-person reports of subjective experience rather than objective behavioral or neural measurements. Commonly, this challenge is met using (variants of) Libet's clock method. In 2008, Matsuhashi and Hallett published a novel probing strategy as an alternative to the clock method. We believe their probe method could provide a valuable addition to the clock method because: it measures the timing of an intention in real-time, it can be combined with additional (tactile, visual or auditory) stimuli to create a more ecologically valid experimental context, and it allows the measurement of the point of no return. Yet to this date, the probe method has not been applied widely - possibly due to concerns about the effects that the probes might have on the intention and/or action preparation processes. To address these concerns, a 2 × 2 within-subject design is tested. In this design, two variables are manipulated: (1) the requirement of an introspection report and (2) the presence of an auditory probe. Three observables are measured that provide information about the timing of an intention to act: (1) awareness reports of the subjective experience of having an intention, (2) neural preparatory activity for action, and (3) behavioral data of the performed actions. The presence of probes was found to speed up mean action times by roughly 300 ms, but did not alter the neural preparation for action. The requirement of an introspection report did influence brain signals: reducing the amplitude of the readiness potential and increasing the desynchronization in the alpha and beta bands over the motor cortex prior to action onset. By discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the probe method compared to the clock method, we hope to demonstrate its added value and promote its use in future research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30914934
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00068
pmc: PMC6423073
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

68

Références

Exp Brain Res. 1999 May;126(1):128-33
pubmed: 10333013
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Apr;5(4):382-5
pubmed: 11896397
Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1965 May 10;284:1-17
pubmed: 14341490
Psychol Sci. 2003 Nov;14(6):586-91
pubmed: 14629690
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jan;7(1):80-4
pubmed: 14647290
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Aug;116(8):1879-88
pubmed: 15979401
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Nov;117(11):2341-56
pubmed: 16876476
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990 Oct;76(4):351-61
pubmed: 1699728
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jan;19(1):81-90
pubmed: 17214565
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Aug 15;164(1):177-90
pubmed: 17517438
Nat Neurosci. 2008 May;11(5):543-5
pubmed: 18408715
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Dec;9(12):934-46
pubmed: 19020512
Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Dec;28(11):2344-51
pubmed: 19046374
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;20(1):17-21
pubmed: 19152537
Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Feb;122(2):364-72
pubmed: 20675187
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;22(1):103-9
pubmed: 21123855
Neuron. 2011 Feb 10;69(3):548-62
pubmed: 21315264
Psychol Sci. 2011 May;22(5):613-8
pubmed: 21515737
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21612
pubmed: 21760881
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109(42):E2904-13
pubmed: 22869750
Front Neuroeng. 2012 Jul 12;5:13
pubmed: 23055968
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Jun;25(6):822-9
pubmed: 23363409
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 9;110(15):6217-22
pubmed: 23509300
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Sep;229(3):329-35
pubmed: 23535835
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Apr;56:129-39
pubmed: 24462950
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Feb;72(2):184-7
pubmed: 2464490
Conscious Cogn. 2014 May;26:105-16
pubmed: 24705181
Am J Psychol. 2014 Summer;127(2):147-55
pubmed: 24934007
Cogn Neurosci. 2014;5(3-4):193-208
pubmed: 24979469
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jun 20;8:450
pubmed: 24999325
Neurosci Res. 2015 Jun;95:74-7
pubmed: 25646667
J Neurosci. 2015 May 6;35(18):7239-55
pubmed: 25948272
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 26;113(4):1080-5
pubmed: 26668390
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Jan;39:38-47
pubmed: 26678844
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Jul;234(7):1945-1956
pubmed: 26920393
Neuroimage. 2016 Jul 1;134:450-458
pubmed: 27107470
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Dec 21;10:642
pubmed: 28066213
Neuroimage. 2018 Jan 15;165:35-47
pubmed: 28966084
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Oct;65:1-26
pubmed: 30007132
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:9-28
pubmed: 30125134
Brain. 1983 Sep;106 (Pt 3):623-42
pubmed: 6640273
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1979 Feb;46(2):138-46
pubmed: 86421

Auteurs

Ceci Verbaarschot (C)

Centre for Cognition, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Pim Haselager (P)

Centre for Cognition, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Jason Farquhar (J)

Centre for Cognition, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH