Comparison of 3D endoanal ultrasound and external phased array magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries.
Anal canal
Magnetic resonance imaging
Postpartum period
Rupture
Ultrasonography
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
15
12
2018
accepted:
22
02
2019
revised:
28
01
2019
pubmed:
28
3
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
28
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The gold standard of postpartum anal sphincter imaging has been the 3D endoanal ultrasound (EAUS). Development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has allowed anal sphincter evaluation without the use of endoanal coils. The aim of this study is to compare these two modalities in diagnosing residual sphincter lesions post obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). Forty women were followed up after primary repair of OASI with both 3D EAUS and external phased array MRI. Details of the anal sphincter injury and sphincter musculature were gathered and analysed. There was a moderate interrater reliability (κ = 0.510) between the two imaging modalities in detecting sphincter lesions, with more lesions detected by MRI. There was a moderate intraclass correlation (ICC) between the circumference of the tear (κ = 0.506) and a fair ICC between the external anal sphincter thickness measurements at locations 3 and 9 on the proctologic clock face (κ = 0.320) and (κ = 0.336). The results of our study indicate that the use of external phased array MRI is feasible for detecting obstetric anal sphincter lesions postpartum. This allows for imaging of the sphincter defects in centres where EAUS imaging is not available. • A two centre prospective study that showed external phased array MRI to be a valid imaging modality for diagnosing obstetric anal sphincter injuries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30915565
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06125-8
pii: 10.1007/s00330-019-06125-8
pmc: PMC6717181
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5717-5722Subventions
Organisme : Varsinais-Suomen Rahasto
ID : 11007
Références
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Oct;187(4):991-9
pubmed: 16985148
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Sep;32(9):1321-1325
pubmed: 28685224
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006 Jan;21(1):52-6
pubmed: 15830204
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Mar;28(3):455-460
pubmed: 27613623
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Jun;23(6):765-8
pubmed: 22057427
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Jun;91(6):715-8
pubmed: 22428951
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug;109(8):1141-57; (Quiz) 1058
pubmed: 25022811
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Sep;95(9):1063-9
pubmed: 27100274
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Feb;154(2):223-7
pubmed: 21055866
Radiology. 2007 Feb;242(2):463-71
pubmed: 17255418
Br J Surg. 1994 Mar;81(3):463-5
pubmed: 8173933
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Sep;175(3):741-5
pubmed: 10954460
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jun 10;7(6):575-81
pubmed: 26078826
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Mar;285(3):591-7
pubmed: 21800085
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Jul;22(7):783-90
pubmed: 17096089
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2015 Feb;75(2):137-144
pubmed: 26157195
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005 Jul;20(4):328-33
pubmed: 15666154
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Oct;16(10):O347-55
pubmed: 24502361
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Sep;12(9):927-30
pubmed: 19508524
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Mar 07;13:59
pubmed: 23497085
Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2012;8(1):23-34
pubmed: 22833776
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Jun;23(6):641-51
pubmed: 18330582
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Jul;12(7):687-91
pubmed: 19486087
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Oct;27(10):1591-6
pubmed: 27085544
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Mar;48(3):524-31
pubmed: 15747083
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Oct;27(10):1513-23
pubmed: 27185318
Colorectal Dis. 2003 Jan;5(1):73-8
pubmed: 12780931
Ann Surg. 2008 Feb;247(2):224-37
pubmed: 18216527
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018 Jul;30(7):e13314
pubmed: 29498141
BJOG. 2008 Jun;115(7):857-65
pubmed: 18485164