Open-Label Randomized Trial of Early Clinical Outcomes of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections at Risk of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection
Ceftaroline
Methicillin-resistant S. aureus
Vancomycin
Journal
Infectious diseases and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8229
Titre abrégé: Infect Dis Ther
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101634499
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
09
10
2018
pubmed:
28
3
2019
medline:
28
3
2019
entrez:
28
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) remain among the most common infectious processes seen in the clinical setting. For patients with complicated ABSSSIs deemed to require intravenous antibiotics, vancomycin remains the mainstay therapy. Ceftaroline has been shown to be non-inferior to vancomycin and may result in faster resolution of signs of infection. Multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized trial of ceftaroline versus vancomycin for the treatment of adult patients admitted for management of ABSSSIs from April 2012 to May 2016; 166 patients in the clinically evaluable (CE) group were needed to determine a 20% difference in primary outcome of clinical response at day 2 or 3 of antibiotics. Clinical response was defined as cessation of spread of lesion and improvement in systemic signs/symptoms of infection. A secondary outcome was a ≥ 20% reduction in lesion size at day 2 or 3 of antibiotics. One hundred seventy-four patients were enrolled in the intention-to-treat (ITT) group and 108 were CE. Among CE patients, 54 were randomized to ceftaroline and 54 to vancomycin. Baseline characteristics were similar except patients in the ceftaroline arm were older and had a non-significantly higher degree of comorbidities (median Charlson score 2 vs. 4, respectively). Cellulitis was the most common type of ABSSSI (85.2% vs. 79.6%, respectively). Rapid diagnostic testing of available cultures (n = 55) demonstrated high agreement with clinical microbiology for identification of Staphylococcus aureus (100%) and MRSA (100%). There was no significant difference in primary outcome of day 2 or 3 clinical response (50.0% vs. 51.9%). Early clinical response between vancomycin- and ceftaroline-treated ABSSSIs was similar. Patients with ABSSSIs rarely remained hospitalized for > 2-3 days, thus limiting our ability to critically assess clinical outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02582203. Allergan plc.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30915685
doi: 10.1007/s40121-019-0242-5
pii: 10.1007/s40121-019-0242-5
pmc: PMC6522568
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02582203']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
199-208Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI121400
Pays : United States
Références
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Nov 15;41(10):1373-406
pubmed: 16231249
Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Dec;27(12):1611-8
pubmed: 18041881
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jul 28;168(14):1585-91
pubmed: 18663172
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Mar;47(3):823-6
pubmed: 19144803
Emerg Infect Dis. 2009 Sep;15(9):1516-8
pubmed: 19788830
Am J Infect Control. 2011 Feb;39(1):42-9
pubmed: 20673598
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Nov;65 Suppl 3:iii35-44
pubmed: 20876627
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Nov;65 Suppl 4:iv41-51
pubmed: 21115454
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Nov;65 Suppl 4:iv53-iv65
pubmed: 21115455
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 15;59(2):147-59
pubmed: 24947530
J Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;48(4):508-19
pubmed: 25605319
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Nov 07;15:503
pubmed: 26547411
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 24;10(11):e0143276
pubmed: 26599005
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016 Aug;48(2):127-36
pubmed: 27283729
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Oct 15;63(8):1034-1041
pubmed: 27402819
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jan 15;64(2):214-217
pubmed: 28003218
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct 1;196(7):856-863
pubmed: 28345952