A nomogram to predict survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with nivolumab.


Journal

Journal of translational medicine
ISSN: 1479-5876
Titre abrégé: J Transl Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101190741

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 03 2019
Historique:
received: 02 01 2019
accepted: 12 03 2019
entrez: 29 3 2019
pubmed: 29 3 2019
medline: 6 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has considerably expanded the armamentarium against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) contributing to reshaping treatment paradigms in the advanced disease setting. While promising tissue- and plasma-based biomarkers are under investigation, no reliable predictive factor is currently available to aid in treatment selection. Patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC receiving nivolumab at Sant'Andrea Hospital and Regina Elena National Cancer Institute from June 2016 to July 2017 were enrolled onto this study. Major clinicopathological parameters were retrieved and correlated with patients' survival outcomes in order to assess their prognostic value and build a useful tool to assist in the decision making process. A total of 102 patients were included in this study. The median age was 69 years (range 44-85 years), 69 (68%) were male and 52% had ECOG PS 0. Loco-regional/distant lymph nodes were the most commonly involved site of metastasis (71%), followed by lung parenchyma (67%) and bone (26%). Overall survival (OS) in the whole patients' population was 83.6%, 63.2% and 46.9% at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively; while progression-free survival (PFS) was 66.5%, 44.4% and 26.4% at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. At univariate analysis, age ≥ 69 years (P = 0.057), ECOG PS (P < 0.001), the presence of liver (P < 0.001), lung (P = 0.017) metastases, lymph nodes only involvement (P = 0.0145) were significantly associated with OS and ECOG PS (P < 0.001) and liver metastases (P < 0.001), retained statistical significance at multivariate analysis. A prognostic nomogram based on three variables (liver and lung metastases and ECOG PS) was built to assign survival probability at 3, 6, and 12 months after nivolumab treatment commencement. We developed a nomogram based on easily available and inexpensive clinical factors showing a good performance in predicting individual OS probability among NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab. This prognostic device could be valuable to clinicians in more accurately driving treatment decision in daily practice as well as enrollment onto clinical trials.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has considerably expanded the armamentarium against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) contributing to reshaping treatment paradigms in the advanced disease setting. While promising tissue- and plasma-based biomarkers are under investigation, no reliable predictive factor is currently available to aid in treatment selection.
METHODS
Patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC receiving nivolumab at Sant'Andrea Hospital and Regina Elena National Cancer Institute from June 2016 to July 2017 were enrolled onto this study. Major clinicopathological parameters were retrieved and correlated with patients' survival outcomes in order to assess their prognostic value and build a useful tool to assist in the decision making process.
RESULTS
A total of 102 patients were included in this study. The median age was 69 years (range 44-85 years), 69 (68%) were male and 52% had ECOG PS 0. Loco-regional/distant lymph nodes were the most commonly involved site of metastasis (71%), followed by lung parenchyma (67%) and bone (26%). Overall survival (OS) in the whole patients' population was 83.6%, 63.2% and 46.9% at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively; while progression-free survival (PFS) was 66.5%, 44.4% and 26.4% at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. At univariate analysis, age ≥ 69 years (P = 0.057), ECOG PS (P < 0.001), the presence of liver (P < 0.001), lung (P = 0.017) metastases, lymph nodes only involvement (P = 0.0145) were significantly associated with OS and ECOG PS (P < 0.001) and liver metastases (P < 0.001), retained statistical significance at multivariate analysis. A prognostic nomogram based on three variables (liver and lung metastases and ECOG PS) was built to assign survival probability at 3, 6, and 12 months after nivolumab treatment commencement.
CONCLUSION
We developed a nomogram based on easily available and inexpensive clinical factors showing a good performance in predicting individual OS probability among NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab. This prognostic device could be valuable to clinicians in more accurately driving treatment decision in daily practice as well as enrollment onto clinical trials.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30917841
doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-1847-x
pii: 10.1186/s12967-019-1847-x
pmc: PMC6437908
doi:

Substances chimiques

Nivolumab 31YO63LBSN

Types de publication

Evaluation Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

99

Références

N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 14;378(24):2288-2301
pubmed: 29863955
Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1540-1550
pubmed: 26712084
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Sep;5(18):376
pubmed: 29057236
Lung Cancer. 2018 Dec;126:217-223
pubmed: 29254746
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1627-39
pubmed: 26412456
Ann Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;29(Suppl 4):iv192-iv237
pubmed: 30285222
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 31;378(22):2078-2092
pubmed: 29658856
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2018 Apr;7(Suppl 2):S91-S94
pubmed: 29782565
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Immunotargets Ther. 2018 Jul 31;7:63-75
pubmed: 30105218
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 22;13(2):e0192227
pubmed: 29470536
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Feb 1;25(3):989-999
pubmed: 30206165
Cancer Immunol Res. 2017 May;5(5):417-424
pubmed: 28411193
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1823-1833
pubmed: 27718847
Nat Rev Immunol. 2003 Jan;3(1):51-62
pubmed: 12511875
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):123-35
pubmed: 26028407
J Transl Med. 2018 Aug 6;16(1):219
pubmed: 30081936
J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Jul;11(7):976-88
pubmed: 26944305
Clin Transl Oncol. 2018 Aug;20(8):1072-1079
pubmed: 29368144
Ann Oncol. 2018 Apr 1;29(4):959-965
pubmed: 29408986

Auteurs

Andrea Botticelli (A)

Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Massimiliano Salati (M)

Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. maxsalati@live.it.
Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research and Gastrointestinal Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, Sutton, UK. maxsalati@live.it.

Francesca Romana Di Pietro (FR)

Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Lidia Strigari (L)

Laboratory of Medical Physics and Expert Systems, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.

Bruna Cerbelli (B)

Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Ilaria Grazia Zizzari (IG)

Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Raffaele Giusti (R)

Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Marco Mazzotta (M)

Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Federica Mazzuca (F)

Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Michela Roberto (M)

Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Patrizia Vici (P)

Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.

Laura Pizzuti (L)

Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.

Marianna Nuti (M)

Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Paolo Marchetti (P)

Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH