The ups and downs of a canopy-forming seaweed over a span of more than one century.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 03 2019
27 03 2019
Historique:
received:
08
08
2018
accepted:
21
02
2019
entrez:
29
3
2019
pubmed:
29
3
2019
medline:
6
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Canopy-forming seaweeds constitute marine forests that deliver ecosystem services. The worldwide range shift, sharp decline or loss of many of these forests, caused by the cumulative impact of increasing human pressure and climate change, have been widely documented. Contrasting examples, reflecting higher than expected resilience, have been more rarely reported. Here, we took the opportunity of having at our disposal a two-century suite of documents (herbarium vouchers, articles) and a ~120-year observation period, dealing with a long-lived brown seaweed, Cystoseira mediterranea, along a well-explored Mediterranean coastline in the Gulf of Lions, to depict the fate of its populations. In addition, we provided baselines for future surveys, with a high degree of accuracy. The northernmost population, scattered on rare suitable substrates, gradually declined and has been extinct since the 1980s. The length of shore occupied by the southern population showed a long-term decline trend, with two sharp minima followed by partial recovery. The causes of the decline differ between sites and periods: coastal development, pollution, competition with mussels, heatwaves and exceptional storms. Overall, the Gulf of Lions populations reflects long-lasting resilience, higher than expected, and a health status that is better than that reported for many other canopy-forming seaweeds.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30918275
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41676-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-41676-2
pmc: PMC6437179
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5250Références
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 25;10(2):e0118581
pubmed: 25714413
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53742
pubmed: 23326496
Ecology. 2008 Dec;89(12):3423-35
pubmed: 19137948
Mar Pollut Bull. 2016 May 15;106(1-2):162-73
pubmed: 26975612
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 29;113(48):13791-13796
pubmed: 27849585
Mar Pollut Bull. 2014 Dec 15;89(1-2):305-323
pubmed: 25440190
J Phycol. 2008 Aug;44(4):897-901
pubmed: 27041607
Nat Commun. 2018 Feb 13;9(1):650
pubmed: 29440658
Mar Pollut Bull. 2007;55(1-6):172-80
pubmed: 17045303
Mar Pollut Bull. 2005 Dec;50(12):1472-89
pubmed: 16026805
Ecol Lett. 2010 Jun;13(6):685-94
pubmed: 20412279
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 26;8(6):e66044
pubmed: 23840397
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 29;113(48):13785-13790
pubmed: 27849580
Mar Pollut Bull. 2017 Jan 15;114(1):528-538
pubmed: 27743657
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 12;13(1):e0191346
pubmed: 29329336
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32742
pubmed: 22393445
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 20;7(1):6012
pubmed: 28729633
Mar Pollut Bull. 2016 Aug 15;109(1):409-418
pubmed: 27236230
PLoS One. 2010 May 24;5(5):e10791
pubmed: 20520726
Science. 2008 Feb 15;319(5865):948-52
pubmed: 18276889