Evaluation of the impact of different drying methods on the phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity, and in vitro digestion of green coffee beans.
antioxidant activity
coffee beans
drying methods
in vitro digestion
phenolics
Journal
Food science & nutrition
ISSN: 2048-7177
Titre abrégé: Food Sci Nutr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101605473
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
10
10
2018
revised:
22
12
2018
accepted:
03
01
2019
entrez:
29
3
2019
pubmed:
29
3
2019
medline:
29
3
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We investigated the effects of different drying methods (room temperature drying, heat pump drying, freeze drying, microwave vacuum drying [MVD], and combined microwave power vacuum drying) on the active ingredients of green coffee beans. We specifically focused on eleven phenolic acids, total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content, antioxidant activity, polyphenol oxidase (PPO), the inhibition of linoleic acid peroxidation (LPO), and enzyme activity, and the bio-accessibility in vitro and bioavailability of phenolics and antioxidant activities were also evaluated. MVD-treated beans had the lowest PPO activity and the highest contents of 5-caffeoylquinic acid (1.39 g/100 g DW), 3-feruloylquinic acid (0.25 g/100 g DW), 4-feruloylquinic acid (0.25 g/100 g DW), 5-feruloylquinic acid (1.52 g/100 g DW), and TPC (5.98 g GAE/100 g DW), and the highest antioxidant activity. MVD was the least time-consuming (0.63 hr/kg) and energy-consuming (1.88 kwh/kg) method. Moreover, the strongest inhibition of LPO and α-glucosidase was observed in MVD-treated beans. Thus, MVD is suggested to be the most suitable drying technique for the preservation of phenolic compounds and bioactivities of green coffee beans.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30918651
doi: 10.1002/fsn3.948
pii: FSN3948
pmc: PMC6418437
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1084-1095Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.
Références
Food Chem. 2016 Apr 15;197 Pt B:1292-300
pubmed: 26675871
Pharmacogn Rev. 2011 Jan;5(9):19-29
pubmed: 22096315
Bioresour Technol. 2016 Jan;200:884-90
pubmed: 26600457
J Agric Food Chem. 2007 Aug 22;55(17):6962-9
pubmed: 17655324
J Agric Food Chem. 2012 Jul 25;60(29):7152-7
pubmed: 22730927
J Agric Food Chem. 2016 Dec 28;64(51):9571-9585
pubmed: 27931098
Food Sci Nutr. 2019 Feb 11;7(3):1084-1095
pubmed: 30918651
Maturitas. 2013 May;75(1):7-21
pubmed: 23465359
Food Chem. 2017 Apr 15;221:1451-1457
pubmed: 27979114
J Agric Food Chem. 2014 May 21;62(20):4610-7
pubmed: 24785184
Food Funct. 2015 May;6(5):1460-9
pubmed: 25857357
Food Chem. 2017 Sep 1;230:174-181
pubmed: 28407898
Free Radic Biol Med. 2007 Sep 15;43(6):933-46
pubmed: 17697938
Food Chem. 2013 Dec 15;141(4):3335-40
pubmed: 23993490
J Agric Food Chem. 2009 Feb 25;57(4):1253-9
pubmed: 19187022
Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Jan;81(1 Suppl):317S-325S
pubmed: 15640497
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016 Jul 29;56 Suppl 1:S110-29
pubmed: 26191781
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2012;15(1):141-83
pubmed: 22365095
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Sep 17;62(12):1043-1051
pubmed: 23871889
Molecules. 2015 Sep 14;20(9):16687-708
pubmed: 26389867
Food Chem. 2017 Nov 1;234:121-130
pubmed: 28551215
Food Funct. 2014 Jun;5(6):1113-24
pubmed: 24803111