Exposure to sublethal concentrations of methoxyfenozide disrupts honey bee colony activity and thermoregulation.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 07 09 2018
accepted: 13 03 2019
entrez: 29 3 2019
pubmed: 29 3 2019
medline: 28 11 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Methoxyfenozide is an insect growth regulator (IGR) commonly used in agriculture to simultaneously control pests and preserve beneficial insect populations; however, its impact on honey bees in not fully understood. We conducted field and laboratory experiments to investigate bee health in response to field-relevant concentrations of this pesticide. Significant effects were observed in honey bee colony flight activity and thermoregulation after being exposed over 9 weeks to supplemental protein patty containing methoxyfenozide. Compared to bee colonies in the control group, colonies fed pollen patty with 200 ppb methoxyfenozide (as measured by residue analysis) had: 1) a significantly reduced rate of weight loss due to forager departure in the morning; and 2) higher temperature variability during the winter. Colonies in the 100 ppb (as measured by residue analysis) treatment group had values between the 200 ppb group and control for both response variables. The dusk break point, which is the time associated with the end of forager return, differed among all treatment groups but may have been confounded with direction the hives were facing. Bee colony metrics of adult bee mass and brood surface area, and measurements of bee head weight, newly-emerged bee weight, and hypopharyngeal gland size were not significantly affected by methoxyfenozide exposure, suggesting that there may be significant effects on honey bee colony behavior and health in the field that are difficult to detect using standard methods for assessing bee colonies and individuals. The second experiment was continued into the following spring, using the same treatment groups as in the fall. Fewer differences were observed among groups in the spring than the fall, possibly because of abundant spring forage and consequent reduced treatment patty consumption. Residue analyses showed that: 1) observed methoxyfenozide concentrations in treatment patty were about 18-60% lower than the calculated concentrations; 2) no residues were observed in wax in any treatment; and 3) methoxyfenozide was detected in bee bread only in the 200 ppb treatment group, at about 1-2.5% of the observed patty concentration.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30921332
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204635
pii: PONE-D-18-26326
pmc: PMC6438536
doi:

Substances chimiques

Hydrazines 0
Insecticides 0
Juvenile Hormones 0
methoxyfenozide 62A22651ZX

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0204635

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Jun;22(6):298-307
pubmed: 17324485
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0190517
pubmed: 29293609
J Insect Physiol. 1998 May;44(5-6):393-404
pubmed: 12770157
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 28;11(12):e0168603
pubmed: 28030617
Annu Rev Entomol. 1998;43:545-69
pubmed: 9444757
Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 02;5:11779
pubmed: 26134631
J Insect Physiol. 2016 Feb;85:65-75
pubmed: 26658137
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 14;10(7):e0132985
pubmed: 26171610
Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2003 Dec;54(4):187-99
pubmed: 14635180
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 2;108(31):12657-62
pubmed: 21775671
J Econ Entomol. 2018 Apr 2;111(2):510-516
pubmed: 29361013
J Econ Entomol. 2015 Dec;108(6):2640-7
pubmed: 26352753
PLoS One. 2010 Mar 19;5(3):e9754
pubmed: 20333298
J Vis Exp. 2018 Sep 14;(139):
pubmed: 30272666
PLoS One. 2018 May 23;13(5):e0197589
pubmed: 29791462
Annu Rev Entomol. 2007;52:81-106
pubmed: 16842032
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 09;9(4):e94482
pubmed: 24718419
PLoS One. 2010 Jan 29;5(1):e8967
pubmed: 20126462
Annu Rev Entomol. 2015 Jan 7;60:415-34
pubmed: 25341092
Biometrics. 2001 Mar;57(1):240-4
pubmed: 11252605
J Econ Entomol. 2012 Oct;105(5):1702-11
pubmed: 23156167
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 9;12(2):e0171529
pubmed: 28182641
J Vis Exp. 2017 Nov 15;(129):
pubmed: 29286367
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 11;8(1):10475
pubmed: 29992997
Pest Manag Sci. 2012 Nov;68(11):1431-7
pubmed: 22945853

Auteurs

William G Meikle (WG)

Carl Hayden Bee Research Center, USDA-ARS, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.

Vanessa Corby-Harris (V)

Carl Hayden Bee Research Center, USDA-ARS, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.

Mark J Carroll (MJ)

Carl Hayden Bee Research Center, USDA-ARS, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.

Milagra Weiss (M)

Carl Hayden Bee Research Center, USDA-ARS, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.

Lucy A Snyder (LA)

Carl Hayden Bee Research Center, USDA-ARS, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.

Charlotte A D Meador (CAD)

Carl Hayden Bee Research Center, USDA-ARS, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.

Eli Beren (E)

Carl Hayden Bee Research Center, USDA-ARS, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.

Nicholas Brown (N)

Carl Hayden Bee Research Center, USDA-ARS, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH