Does Dynamic Tape change the walking biomechanics of women with greater trochanteric pain syndrome? A blinded randomised controlled crossover trial.
Athletic Tape
Biomechanical Phenomena
Cross-Over Studies
Female
Femur
/ physiopathology
Follow-Up Studies
Hip Joint
/ physiopathology
Humans
Joint Diseases
/ diagnosis
Kinetics
Linear Models
Musculoskeletal Pain
/ diagnosis
Pain Measurement
Single-Blind Method
Syndrome
Treatment Outcome
Walking
/ physiology
Young Adult
Gait
Gluteal tendinopathy
Greater trochanteric pain syndrome
Hip adduction
Hip biomechanics
Lateral hip pain
Sports tape
Treatment
Women
Journal
Gait & posture
ISSN: 1879-2219
Titre abrégé: Gait Posture
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9416830
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
received:
01
05
2018
revised:
27
01
2019
accepted:
26
02
2019
pubmed:
29
3
2019
medline:
13
7
2019
entrez:
29
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is considerable debate among clinicians as to whether sports tape can provide mechanical support and pain relief. People with greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) have increased adduction moment, adduction angle and pelvic obliquity, likely contributing to the continuation of the pathology. We aimed to see if Dynamic Tape Fifty women with GTPS participated in a three-dimensional gait analysis. Each participant performed three walking trials: baseline, and two subsequent trials, with active and sham applications of Dynamic Tape. The order of active and sham taping was randomised. Differences in kinetic and kinematic data were analysed using mixed model linear regressions for each condition. Pain scores were obtained before and immediately after walking trials. Hip adduction moment was reduced at first peak by both active (p < 0.001) and sham tape (p = 0.028), with no between group difference; at second peak by the active taping (p < 0.001), with a between-group difference (p < 0.001). Adduction angle was reduced at first peak by both active (p < 0.001) and sham taping (p = 0.026), with the active taping producing a larger effect (p = 0.004); at mid-stance by active taping (p = 0.003), with a between-group difference (p = 0.002); there was no reduction at second peak. Internal rotation was reduced at the first (p < 0.001) and second peaks (p < 0.001), and mid-stance by the active taping alone (p < 0.001). Pelvic obliquity was reduced at the first peak (p = 0.019), mid-stance (p < 0.001) and second peak (p < 0.001) by the active tape, with a between-group difference at mid-stance (p = 0.03). Both the active and sham taping resulted in a clinically meaningful pain reduction. Dynamic Tape produced a mechanical effect and a meaningful reduction in pain in women with GTPS. The extent that placebo or somatosensory input may have had on these results is not clear. ACTRN12617001611314.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30921578
pii: S0966-6362(18)30351-5
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.02.031
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ANZCTR
['ACTRN12617001611314']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
275-283Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.