Evaluation of the avian acute oral and sub-acute dietary toxicity test for pesticide registration.


Journal

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP
ISSN: 1096-0295
Titre abrégé: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8214983

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Historique:
received: 27 09 2018
revised: 17 02 2019
accepted: 18 03 2019
pubmed: 30 3 2019
medline: 10 7 2019
entrez: 30 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), as well as other international regulatory agencies, require pesticide registrants to submit toxicity data that are used to conduct ecological risk assessments. While the USEPA has required both an acute oral and sub-acute dietary test in birds, trends in the use of data from these tests over the past 20 years have suggested that the avian sub-acute dietary test generally does not contribute to risk assessment conclusions. To address this question, a retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate 119 pesticides with publicly available ecological risk assessments that were registered into commerce between 1998 and 2017. New pesticides (i.e., registered in the United States within the past 20 years) were chosen for the retrospective analysis to show utility of these tests for modern pesticide chemistries. Risk quotient (RQ) values (a point estimate of exposure divided by a deterministic toxicity endpoint) from the avian acute oral and dietary tests, as well as risk assessment conclusions, were compared to determine which test(s) drove the risk assessment findings. The RQ values were chosen as the data point for comparison in order to assess total risk (i.e., exposure and toxicity). After comparing RQ values from avian acute oral versus sub-acute dietary tests, there was only one case in which an avian sub-acute dietary RQ was greater than the acute oral RQ. Thus, the sub-acute dietary test did not identify risk in greater than 99% (118 out of 119) of chemicals based on results that either the acute oral RQ was higher than the sub-acute dietary RQ, or both the acute oral and the subacute dietary tests did not generate an RQ value of concern. For the one exception, both the oral and sub-acute RQ values were greater than the USEPA's level of concern for endangered species. Based on the results of the retrospective analysis, it is concluded that in most cases avian risk can confidently be assessed without conducting the sub-acute dietary test.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30922892
pii: S0273-2300(19)30085-6
doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.03.013
pmc: PMC9022720
mid: NIHMS1595498
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Pesticides 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

30-35

Subventions

Organisme : Intramural EPA
ID : EPA999999
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Gina M Hilton (GM)

PETA International Science Consortium Ltd, London, UK. Electronic address: GinaH@piscltd.org.uk.

Edward Odenkirchen (E)

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA(1).

Melissa Panger (M)

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA(1).

Garland Waleko (G)

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA(1).

Anna Lowit (A)

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA(1).

Amy J Clippinger (AJ)

PETA International Science Consortium Ltd, London, UK.

Articles similaires

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
Humans Emergency Service, Hospital Child Child, Preschool Infant

Vancomycin-associated DRESS demonstrates delay in AST abnormalities.

Ahmed Hussein, Kateri L Schoettinger, Jourdan Hydol-Smith et al.
1.00
Humans Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome Vancomycin Female Male

Classifications MeSH