Have I been here before? Complex interactions of age and test experience modulate the results of behavioural tests.


Journal

Behavioural brain research
ISSN: 1872-7549
Titre abrégé: Behav Brain Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8004872

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 07 2019
Historique:
received: 27 11 2018
revised: 05 03 2019
accepted: 24 03 2019
pubmed: 30 3 2019
medline: 9 6 2020
entrez: 30 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Recently, a discussion about the reproducibility of results from behavioural phenotyping experiments has emerged. A huge emphasis has therefore been put on the identification of those factors that might limit the reproducibility of behavioural data. As a comprehensive phenotypic characterisation can involve testing of the same animal repeatedly over a specific time period, the aim of the present study was to systematically investigate effects of two potentially confounding variables, age of the animals and test experience. For this purpose, the behaviour of 48 male C57BL/6 J mice of two different ages (9 vs. 13 weeks) was assessed in a battery of common behavioural tests measuring anxiety-like and exploratory behaviour (Elevated Plus Maze, Dark-Light test, Open Field test, Novel Cage test). While half of the mice of each age group was naïve to the test battery, the other half had experienced the same tests before. Besides main effects of both age and test experience on anxiety-like and exploratory behaviour, the analysis also revealed profound interactions between these factors. More precisely, an effect of age was apparent in experienced but not in naïve mice. Furthermore, the effect of previous test experience was more pronounced in older than in younger mice. These findings clearly demonstrate that experimental factors, such as age and test experience, can influence behavioural data not just additively, but also in a complex, interactive way. To provide robust and reproducible results, it is thus fundamental to consider such factors systematically in the study design.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30922938
pii: S0166-4328(18)31663-2
doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.03.042
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

143-148

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Vanessa Tabea von Kortzfleisch (VT)

Department of Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Germany; Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, Germany. Electronic address: v_vonk01@uni-muenster.de.

Niklas Kästner (N)

Department of Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Germany.

Lena Prange (L)

Department of Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Germany.

Sylvia Kaiser (S)

Department of Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Germany; Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, Germany.

Norbert Sachser (N)

Department of Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Germany; Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, Germany.

S Helene Richter (SH)

Department of Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Germany; Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, Germany.

Articles similaires

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male
Humans Meals Time Factors Female Adult

Classifications MeSH