Taxonomy of approaches to developing interventions to improve health: a systematic methods overview.
Guidance
Health
Intervention development
Methodology
Review
Journal
Pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN: 2055-5784
Titre abrégé: Pilot Feasibility Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676536
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
24
09
2018
accepted:
24
02
2019
entrez:
30
3
2019
pubmed:
30
3
2019
medline:
30
3
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Interventions need to be developed prior to the feasibility and piloting phase of a study. There are a variety of published approaches to developing interventions, programmes or innovations to improve health. Identifying different types of approach, and synthesising the range of actions taken within this endeavour, can inform future intervention development. This study is a systematic methods overview of approaches to intervention development. Approaches were considered for inclusion if they described how to develop or adapt an intervention in a book, website or journal article published after 2007, or were cited in a primary research study reporting the development of a specific intervention published in 2015 or 2016. Approaches were read, a taxonomy of approaches was developed and the range of actions taken across different approaches were synthesised. Eight categories of approach to intervention development were identified. (1) Partnership, where people who will use the intervention participate equally with the research team in decision-making about the intervention throughout the development process. (2) Target population-centred, where the intervention is based on the views and actions of the people who will use it. (3) Evidence and theory-based, where the intervention is based on published research evidence and existing theories. (4) Implementation-based, where the intervention is developed with attention to ensuring it will be used in the real world. (5) Efficiency-based, where components of an intervention are tested using experimental designs to select components which will optimise efficiency. (6) Stepped or phased, where interventions are developed with an emphasis on following a systematic set of processes. (7) Intervention-specific, where an approach is constructed for a specific type of intervention. (8) Combination, where existing approaches to intervention development are formally combined. The actions from approaches in all eight categories were synthesised to identify 18 actions to consider when developing interventions. This overview of approaches to intervention development can help researchers to understand the variety of existing approaches, and to understand the range of possible actions involved in intervention development, prior to assessing feasibility or piloting the intervention. Findings from this overview will contribute to future guidance on intervention development. PROSPERO CRD42017080553.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Interventions need to be developed prior to the feasibility and piloting phase of a study. There are a variety of published approaches to developing interventions, programmes or innovations to improve health. Identifying different types of approach, and synthesising the range of actions taken within this endeavour, can inform future intervention development.
METHODS
METHODS
This study is a systematic methods overview of approaches to intervention development. Approaches were considered for inclusion if they described how to develop or adapt an intervention in a book, website or journal article published after 2007, or were cited in a primary research study reporting the development of a specific intervention published in 2015 or 2016. Approaches were read, a taxonomy of approaches was developed and the range of actions taken across different approaches were synthesised.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Eight categories of approach to intervention development were identified. (1) Partnership, where people who will use the intervention participate equally with the research team in decision-making about the intervention throughout the development process. (2) Target population-centred, where the intervention is based on the views and actions of the people who will use it. (3) Evidence and theory-based, where the intervention is based on published research evidence and existing theories. (4) Implementation-based, where the intervention is developed with attention to ensuring it will be used in the real world. (5) Efficiency-based, where components of an intervention are tested using experimental designs to select components which will optimise efficiency. (6) Stepped or phased, where interventions are developed with an emphasis on following a systematic set of processes. (7) Intervention-specific, where an approach is constructed for a specific type of intervention. (8) Combination, where existing approaches to intervention development are formally combined. The actions from approaches in all eight categories were synthesised to identify 18 actions to consider when developing interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This overview of approaches to intervention development can help researchers to understand the variety of existing approaches, and to understand the range of possible actions involved in intervention development, prior to assessing feasibility or piloting the intervention. Findings from this overview will contribute to future guidance on intervention development.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
PROSPERO CRD42017080553.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30923626
doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0425-6
pii: 425
pmc: PMC6419435
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
41Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K025643/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/N015339/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have experience of intervention development. PH and LY have written about approaches to intervention development. PH, LY, LC and ED have developed or adapted interventions. AOC and KT have been co-applicants on studies where others have developed or adapted interventions.Not applicable because it is a review of research methods.Not applicable.Two authors of this article have produced approaches to intervention development included in this overview (PH and LY).Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Références
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Oct;48(1):84-92
pubmed: 15347414
BMJ. 2005 Nov 5;331(7524):1064-5
pubmed: 16230312
Stroke. 2006 Sep;37(9):2410-9
pubmed: 16902171
Am J Prev Med. 2007 May;32(5 Suppl):S112-8
pubmed: 17466815
Implement Sci. 2008 Mar 19;3:17
pubmed: 18353186
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
Stat Med. 2009 Sep 20;28(21):2687-708
pubmed: 19575485
Health Promot Int. 2010 Jun;25(2):248-57
pubmed: 20299500
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Feb;82(2):260-5
pubmed: 20627644
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Dec;66(12):2604-19
pubmed: 20735504
BMC Med. 2010 Oct 20;8:63
pubmed: 20961442
BMC Public Health. 2010 Dec 31;10:800
pubmed: 21194466
Psychol Methods. 2012 Jun;17(2):153-75
pubmed: 22309956
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:38
pubmed: 22531013
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 May;50(5):585-7
pubmed: 23159017
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):101-4
pubmed: 24411643
BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687
pubmed: 24609605
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S2
pubmed: 24625093
Trials. 2014 Jul 05;15:267
pubmed: 24996765
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:307-23
pubmed: 25581153
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 30;17(1):e30
pubmed: 25639757
Health Psychol. 2015 Oct;34(10):971-82
pubmed: 25642841
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 23;17(1):e28
pubmed: 25650702
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258
pubmed: 25791983
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 May;70(5):520-5
pubmed: 26573236
Health Psychol. 2015 Dec;34S:1220-8
pubmed: 26651463
J Comp Eff Res. 2016 Jan;5(1):13-5
pubmed: 26698828
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;222:139-51
pubmed: 27198099
BMJ. 2016 Aug 23;354:i4536
pubmed: 27553644
Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 11;5(1):172
pubmed: 27729071
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015 Oct 26;1:36
pubmed: 27965814
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015 Oct 26;1:37
pubmed: 27965815
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Mar 15;2:17
pubmed: 27965837
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 16;18(12):e317
pubmed: 27986647
Implement Sci. 2017 Mar 4;12(1):30
pubmed: 28259168
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;235:368-372
pubmed: 28423816
Health Promot Pract. 2017 Sep;18(5):696-705
pubmed: 28557551
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 29;19(6):e232
pubmed: 28663162
BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 4;17(1):689
pubmed: 28870192
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Mar;79:86-93
pubmed: 29220738
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 May 28;4:104
pubmed: 29854417