Ultrasound findings in classic metaphyseal lesions: emphasis on the metaphyseal bone collar and zone of provisional calcification.
Bucket handle fracture
Child abuse
Children
Classic metaphyseal lesion
Corner fracture
Infants
Non-accidental trauma
Ultrasound
Journal
Pediatric radiology
ISSN: 1432-1998
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0365332
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
27
08
2018
accepted:
25
02
2019
revised:
21
12
2018
pubmed:
30
3
2019
medline:
17
4
2020
entrez:
30
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The classic metaphyseal lesion (CML) is highly specific for non-accidental trauma in infants. While the radiographic findings are well documented, there is little literature on the ultrasound (US) appearance. To evaluate US findings in CMLs identified on radiographs. This institutional review board-approved, retrospective evaluation of targeted US of CMLs was performed in selected groups of children from 2014 to 2017. Only CMLs confidently identified on radiography by a consensus of two radiologists were included. US images were obtained with a linear transducer, including longitudinal images at lateral, anterior, medial and posterior aspects. Two pediatric radiologists evaluated the US appearance, specifically the metaphyseal bone collar for thickness, deformity and fracture, as well as the sonographic zone of provisional calcification for irregularity and appearance of multiple lines. Radiography was the reference standard. Twenty-two patients (13 female; mean age: 4.2 months) were identified, with 39 CMLs in the tibia (n=22), femur (n=11), humerus (n=3), radius (n=2) and fibula (n=1). Thirty-three of the 39 CMLs (85%) were identified on US, while 6 (15%) were not seen (false negatives). Thirty of the 39 (77%) had metaphyseal bone collar thickening, 29 (74%) had collar deformity and 12 (31%) had visible fracture of the collar. At the sonographic zone of provisional calcification, 16/39 (41%) had irregularity and 5 (13%) had multiple lines visible. Identifying metaphyseal bone collar and zone of provisional calcification abnormalities is key to recognizing CMLs on US. While additional studies are necessary to evaluate the accuracy of US in the diagnosis of CMLs, our findings suggest US may have a potential role in either confirming or evaluating radiographically equivocal/occult CMLs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The classic metaphyseal lesion (CML) is highly specific for non-accidental trauma in infants. While the radiographic findings are well documented, there is little literature on the ultrasound (US) appearance.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate US findings in CMLs identified on radiographs.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This institutional review board-approved, retrospective evaluation of targeted US of CMLs was performed in selected groups of children from 2014 to 2017. Only CMLs confidently identified on radiography by a consensus of two radiologists were included. US images were obtained with a linear transducer, including longitudinal images at lateral, anterior, medial and posterior aspects. Two pediatric radiologists evaluated the US appearance, specifically the metaphyseal bone collar for thickness, deformity and fracture, as well as the sonographic zone of provisional calcification for irregularity and appearance of multiple lines. Radiography was the reference standard.
RESULTS
Twenty-two patients (13 female; mean age: 4.2 months) were identified, with 39 CMLs in the tibia (n=22), femur (n=11), humerus (n=3), radius (n=2) and fibula (n=1). Thirty-three of the 39 CMLs (85%) were identified on US, while 6 (15%) were not seen (false negatives). Thirty of the 39 (77%) had metaphyseal bone collar thickening, 29 (74%) had collar deformity and 12 (31%) had visible fracture of the collar. At the sonographic zone of provisional calcification, 16/39 (41%) had irregularity and 5 (13%) had multiple lines visible.
CONCLUSION
Identifying metaphyseal bone collar and zone of provisional calcification abnormalities is key to recognizing CMLs on US. While additional studies are necessary to evaluate the accuracy of US in the diagnosis of CMLs, our findings suggest US may have a potential role in either confirming or evaluating radiographically equivocal/occult CMLs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30923870
doi: 10.1007/s00247-019-04373-w
pii: 10.1007/s00247-019-04373-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
913-921Références
Pediatr Radiol. 1993;23(4):264-7
pubmed: 8414751
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Sep;165(3):647-50
pubmed: 7645487
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Oct;197(4):1005-8
pubmed: 21940592
JAMA. 1999 Feb 17;281(7):621-6
pubmed: 10029123
Radiology. 2010 Apr;255(1):173-81
pubmed: 20308455
Pediatr Radiol. 2012 Apr;42(4):463-9
pubmed: 21975659
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Feb;204(2):W192-8
pubmed: 25615780
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Apr;156(4):775-9
pubmed: 2003445
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Sep;195(3):744-50
pubmed: 20729455
Br J Radiol. 1957 May;30(353):225-38
pubmed: 13426502
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 May;14(5S):S338-S349
pubmed: 28473090
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Oct;167(4):893-6
pubmed: 8819377
Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Nov;47(12):1622-1630
pubmed: 28721473
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 May;146(5):895-905
pubmed: 3485907
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Oct;77(10):1471-6
pubmed: 7593055
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 May;192(5):1266-8
pubmed: 19380550
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Apr;156(4):781-3
pubmed: 2003446
J Pediatr Orthop. 1993 Mar-Apr;13(2):249-54
pubmed: 8459021
Skeletal Radiol. 1992;21(5):283-6
pubmed: 1502578
Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Jul;48(7):973-978
pubmed: 29541806