Responses of phyllosphere microbiota and plant health to application of two different biocontrol agents.
Biocontrol agent
Community diversity
Molecular ecology networks
Phyllosphere microbiota
Tobacco wildfire disease
Journal
AMB Express
ISSN: 2191-0855
Titre abrégé: AMB Express
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101561785
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Mar 2019
28 Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
08
03
2019
accepted:
18
03
2019
entrez:
30
3
2019
pubmed:
30
3
2019
medline:
30
3
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The phyllosphere supports a tremendous diversity of microbes, which have the potential to influence plant biogeography and ecosystem function. Although biocontrol agents (BCAs) have been used extensively for controlling plant diseases, the ecological effects of BCAs on phyllosphere bacteria and the relationships between phyllosphere community and plant health are poorly understood. In this study, we explored the control efficiency of two BCA communities on bacterial wildfire disease by repeatedly spraying BCAs on tobacco leaves. The results of field tests showed that BCAs used in our study, especially BCA_B, had remarkable control effects against tobacco wildfire disease. The higher control efficiency of BCA_B might be attributed to a highly diverse and complex community in the phyllosphere. By 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing, we found that phyllosphere microbial community, including community diversity, taxonomic composition and microbial interactions, changed significantly by application of BCAs. According to the correlation analysis, it showed that wildfire disease infection of plants was negatively related to phyllosphere microbial diversity, indicating a highly diverse community in the phyllosphere might prevent pathogens invasion and colonization. In addition, we inferred that a more complex network in the phyllosphere might be beneficial for decreasing the chances of bacterial wildfire outbreak, and the genera of Pantoea and Sphingomonas might play important roles in wildfire disease suppression. These correlations between phyllosphere community and plant health will improve our understanding on the ecological function of phyllosphere community on plants.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30924016
doi: 10.1186/s13568-019-0765-x
pii: 10.1186/s13568-019-0765-x
pmc: PMC6439047
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
42Subventions
Organisme : Key Project of Science and Technology of Hunan Branch of China National Tobacco Corporation
ID : 16-19Aa02
Organisme : Key Project of Science and Technology of Hunan Branch of China National Tobacco Corporation
ID : 18-21Aa04
Organisme : Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University
ID : 2018zzts762
Références
J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97(3):504-11
pubmed: 15281930
Microb Ecol. 2007 May;53(4):524-36
pubmed: 17356949
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7
pubmed: 17586664
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19891-6
pubmed: 18056808
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008 Jul;284(1):102-8
pubmed: 18462395
J Basic Microbiol. 2008 Aug;48(4):269-77
pubmed: 18720503
J Biotechnol. 2009 Mar 10;140(1-2):27-37
pubmed: 19041913
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 22;106(38):16428-33
pubmed: 19805315
Oecologia. 2010 Oct;164(2):521-31
pubmed: 20454976
ISME J. 2011 Feb;5(2):169-72
pubmed: 20827291
MBio. 2010 Oct 05;1(4):null
pubmed: 20941329
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Mar;77(5):1548-55
pubmed: 21216911
ISME J. 2011 Jul;5(7):1108-14
pubmed: 21346790
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 May;77(10):3202-10
pubmed: 21421777
Science. 2011 May 27;332(6033):1097-100
pubmed: 21551032
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2011;49:47-67
pubmed: 21639781
Phytopathology. 2011 Oct;101(10):1234-41
pubmed: 21679036
MBio. 2011 Jul 26;2(4):null
pubmed: 21791581
Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 1;27(21):2957-63
pubmed: 21903629
Oecologia. 2012 Mar;168(3):621-9
pubmed: 21983641
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 24;109(4):1159-64
pubmed: 22232669
ISME J. 2012 Aug;6(8):1621-4
pubmed: 22402401
BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 May 30;13:113
pubmed: 22646978
BMC Genomics. 2012 Nov 15;13:625
pubmed: 23151240
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012 Dec;10(12):828-40
pubmed: 23154261
Int J Food Microbiol. 2013 Jan 1;160(3):313-22
pubmed: 23290240
Bacteriophage. 2012 Oct 1;2(4):208-214
pubmed: 23531902
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59310
pubmed: 23544058
Int J Mol Sci. 2013 May 02;14(5):9497-513
pubmed: 23644883
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 02;8(7):e68642
pubmed: 23844230
Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):996-8
pubmed: 23955772
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:863240
pubmed: 23957006
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014 Jan;87(1):2-17
pubmed: 24003903
Phytopathology. 2013 Oct;103(10):1001-11
pubmed: 24020904
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Jun;80(12):3585-96
pubmed: 24682305
Front Microbiol. 2014 May 20;5:219
pubmed: 24904535
ISME J. 2016 Jan;10(1):119-29
pubmed: 26057845
Environ Microbiol. 2016 Jan;18(1):205-18
pubmed: 26177312
Ecology. 2015 Apr;96(4):915-26
pubmed: 26230013
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 8;112(36):E5013-20
pubmed: 26305938
Trends Microbiol. 2015 Nov;23(11):719-729
pubmed: 26439296
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 03;6:22611
pubmed: 26936109
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017 Feb;101(3):1289-1299
pubmed: 27816989
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 23;7(1):343
pubmed: 28336973
Front Microbiol. 2017 Nov 07;8:2179
pubmed: 29163453
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Mar;102(5):2399-2412
pubmed: 29368216
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Apr;102(8):3805-3818
pubmed: 29532103