Modified less invasive anterior subcutaneous fixator for unstable Tile-C-pelvic ring fractures: a biomechanical study.


Journal

Biomedical engineering online
ISSN: 1475-925X
Titre abrégé: Biomed Eng Online
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147518

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Mar 2019
Historique:
received: 11 05 2018
accepted: 13 03 2019
entrez: 31 3 2019
pubmed: 31 3 2019
medline: 23 7 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Operative procedures for unstable pelvic ring fractures remain controversially discussed. Minimally invasive treatment options for pelvic ring fractures have several benefits for the patient. But they can also provide disadvantages. Anterior subcutaneous pelvic fixation (INFIX) has shown promising biomechanical results in pelvic ring fractures, but there is a high complication rate of nerve injuries. An additional screw to the INFIX seems to be more stable. The aim of this study is to compare biomechanical stability of a new modified unilateral INFIX fixing the unilateral injured pelvic ring with the standard INFIX. 24 composite synthetic full pelvises were used in this study. 4 groups each with a number of six pelvic specimens were randomly assigned. A C1.3-type pelvic fracture was made with an osteotomy of the sacrum and an osteotomy of the anterior pelvic ring. Fracture fixation was performed within the four groups: (1) unilateral INFIX, (2) "extended" unilateral INFIX + additional pubic ramus pedicle screw, (3) bilateral INFIX, (4) "extended" bilateral INFIX + additional pubic ramus pedicle screw. All specimens were cyclic loaded with 200 N until maximum of 300 N. Distance/dislocation of the fracture fragments were detected with 3D-ultrasound measuring system. Stiffness was calculated. Extended unilateral INFIX showed the lowest mean dislocation. Lowest rotational stability was displayed by the standard bilateral INFIX. A significant difference (P = 0.04) was shown between the extended unilateral INFIX and the "standard" bilateral INFIX in terms of rotational stability. Extended unilateral INFIX showed significantly improved stability of anterior fracture dislocation (P = 0.01) and unilateral INFIX showed the highest rotational stiffness. Anterior fixation stiffness of the unilateral INFIX was significantly improved using an additional symphysis/pubic ramus screw (P = 0.002). Extended unilateral INFIX (+ additional pubic ramus pedicle screw) is a feasible minimally invasive treatment for anterior pelvic ring fractures. Higher stability and lower probability of bilateral nerve damage is provided by the extended unilateral INFIX compared to the standard bilateral INFIX.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Operative procedures for unstable pelvic ring fractures remain controversially discussed. Minimally invasive treatment options for pelvic ring fractures have several benefits for the patient. But they can also provide disadvantages. Anterior subcutaneous pelvic fixation (INFIX) has shown promising biomechanical results in pelvic ring fractures, but there is a high complication rate of nerve injuries. An additional screw to the INFIX seems to be more stable. The aim of this study is to compare biomechanical stability of a new modified unilateral INFIX fixing the unilateral injured pelvic ring with the standard INFIX.
METHODS METHODS
24 composite synthetic full pelvises were used in this study. 4 groups each with a number of six pelvic specimens were randomly assigned. A C1.3-type pelvic fracture was made with an osteotomy of the sacrum and an osteotomy of the anterior pelvic ring. Fracture fixation was performed within the four groups: (1) unilateral INFIX, (2) "extended" unilateral INFIX + additional pubic ramus pedicle screw, (3) bilateral INFIX, (4) "extended" bilateral INFIX + additional pubic ramus pedicle screw. All specimens were cyclic loaded with 200 N until maximum of 300 N. Distance/dislocation of the fracture fragments were detected with 3D-ultrasound measuring system. Stiffness was calculated.
RESULTS RESULTS
Extended unilateral INFIX showed the lowest mean dislocation. Lowest rotational stability was displayed by the standard bilateral INFIX. A significant difference (P = 0.04) was shown between the extended unilateral INFIX and the "standard" bilateral INFIX in terms of rotational stability. Extended unilateral INFIX showed significantly improved stability of anterior fracture dislocation (P = 0.01) and unilateral INFIX showed the highest rotational stiffness. Anterior fixation stiffness of the unilateral INFIX was significantly improved using an additional symphysis/pubic ramus screw (P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Extended unilateral INFIX (+ additional pubic ramus pedicle screw) is a feasible minimally invasive treatment for anterior pelvic ring fractures. Higher stability and lower probability of bilateral nerve damage is provided by the extended unilateral INFIX compared to the standard bilateral INFIX.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30925898
doi: 10.1186/s12938-019-0648-z
pii: 10.1186/s12938-019-0648-z
pmc: PMC6441140
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

38

Subventions

Organisme : Medizinischen Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
ID : 935

Références

Injury. 2005 May;36(5):599-604
pubmed: 15826617
J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Apr;21(4):269-73
pubmed: 17414555
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2124-31
pubmed: 22219004
J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):269-77
pubmed: 22357081
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2116-23
pubmed: 22492171
J Orthop Surg Res. 2012 Sep 27;7:31
pubmed: 23017093
Injury. 2014 Dec;45 Suppl 6:S9-S15
pubmed: 25457312
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Dec;41(6):665-71
pubmed: 26038006
Int Orthop. 2017 Sep;41(9):1785-1790
pubmed: 28236073
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2017 Jan;5(1):6-12
pubmed: 28246617
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Mar 7;12(1):38
pubmed: 28270223
Injury. 2017 Jun;48(6):1139-1146
pubmed: 28363753
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Jul;137(7):887-893
pubmed: 28439704
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017 Aug;8(Suppl 1):S11-S16
pubmed: 28878532
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):232-240
pubmed: 28951640
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):241-248
pubmed: 28951641
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988 Jan;70(1):1-12
pubmed: 3276697

Auteurs

Christopher A Becker (CA)

Department of General Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Christian Kammerlander (C)

Department of General Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Adrian Cavalcanti Kußmaul (AC)

Department of General Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Matthias Woiczinski (M)

Department of Orthopedics, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Christoph Thorwächter (C)

Department of Orthopedics, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Christian Zeckey (C)

Department of General Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Fabian Sommer (F)

Department of General Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Christoph Linhart (C)

Department of General Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Simon Weidert (S)

Department of General Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Eduardo M Suero (EM)

Department of General Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Wolfgang Böcker (W)

Department of General Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Axel Greiner (A)

Department of General Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. axel.greiner@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Articles similaires

Hemiarthroplasty in young patients.

Hazimah Mahmud, Dong Wang, Andra Topan-Rat et al.
1.00
Humans Male Hemiarthroplasty Middle Aged Aged
Silicon Dioxide Water Hot Temperature Compressive Strength X-Ray Diffraction
Humans Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee Osteoarthritis, Knee Awards and Prizes Biomechanical Phenomena

Classifications MeSH