Modified less invasive anterior subcutaneous fixator for unstable Tile-C-pelvic ring fractures: a biomechanical study.
Biomechanical study
Minimally invasive fixation
Pelvic ring fracture
Tile-C-fracture
Journal
Biomedical engineering online
ISSN: 1475-925X
Titre abrégé: Biomed Eng Online
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147518
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Mar 2019
29 Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
11
05
2018
accepted:
13
03
2019
entrez:
31
3
2019
pubmed:
31
3
2019
medline:
23
7
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Operative procedures for unstable pelvic ring fractures remain controversially discussed. Minimally invasive treatment options for pelvic ring fractures have several benefits for the patient. But they can also provide disadvantages. Anterior subcutaneous pelvic fixation (INFIX) has shown promising biomechanical results in pelvic ring fractures, but there is a high complication rate of nerve injuries. An additional screw to the INFIX seems to be more stable. The aim of this study is to compare biomechanical stability of a new modified unilateral INFIX fixing the unilateral injured pelvic ring with the standard INFIX. 24 composite synthetic full pelvises were used in this study. 4 groups each with a number of six pelvic specimens were randomly assigned. A C1.3-type pelvic fracture was made with an osteotomy of the sacrum and an osteotomy of the anterior pelvic ring. Fracture fixation was performed within the four groups: (1) unilateral INFIX, (2) "extended" unilateral INFIX + additional pubic ramus pedicle screw, (3) bilateral INFIX, (4) "extended" bilateral INFIX + additional pubic ramus pedicle screw. All specimens were cyclic loaded with 200 N until maximum of 300 N. Distance/dislocation of the fracture fragments were detected with 3D-ultrasound measuring system. Stiffness was calculated. Extended unilateral INFIX showed the lowest mean dislocation. Lowest rotational stability was displayed by the standard bilateral INFIX. A significant difference (P = 0.04) was shown between the extended unilateral INFIX and the "standard" bilateral INFIX in terms of rotational stability. Extended unilateral INFIX showed significantly improved stability of anterior fracture dislocation (P = 0.01) and unilateral INFIX showed the highest rotational stiffness. Anterior fixation stiffness of the unilateral INFIX was significantly improved using an additional symphysis/pubic ramus screw (P = 0.002). Extended unilateral INFIX (+ additional pubic ramus pedicle screw) is a feasible minimally invasive treatment for anterior pelvic ring fractures. Higher stability and lower probability of bilateral nerve damage is provided by the extended unilateral INFIX compared to the standard bilateral INFIX.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Operative procedures for unstable pelvic ring fractures remain controversially discussed. Minimally invasive treatment options for pelvic ring fractures have several benefits for the patient. But they can also provide disadvantages. Anterior subcutaneous pelvic fixation (INFIX) has shown promising biomechanical results in pelvic ring fractures, but there is a high complication rate of nerve injuries. An additional screw to the INFIX seems to be more stable. The aim of this study is to compare biomechanical stability of a new modified unilateral INFIX fixing the unilateral injured pelvic ring with the standard INFIX.
METHODS
METHODS
24 composite synthetic full pelvises were used in this study. 4 groups each with a number of six pelvic specimens were randomly assigned. A C1.3-type pelvic fracture was made with an osteotomy of the sacrum and an osteotomy of the anterior pelvic ring. Fracture fixation was performed within the four groups: (1) unilateral INFIX, (2) "extended" unilateral INFIX + additional pubic ramus pedicle screw, (3) bilateral INFIX, (4) "extended" bilateral INFIX + additional pubic ramus pedicle screw. All specimens were cyclic loaded with 200 N until maximum of 300 N. Distance/dislocation of the fracture fragments were detected with 3D-ultrasound measuring system. Stiffness was calculated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Extended unilateral INFIX showed the lowest mean dislocation. Lowest rotational stability was displayed by the standard bilateral INFIX. A significant difference (P = 0.04) was shown between the extended unilateral INFIX and the "standard" bilateral INFIX in terms of rotational stability. Extended unilateral INFIX showed significantly improved stability of anterior fracture dislocation (P = 0.01) and unilateral INFIX showed the highest rotational stiffness. Anterior fixation stiffness of the unilateral INFIX was significantly improved using an additional symphysis/pubic ramus screw (P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Extended unilateral INFIX (+ additional pubic ramus pedicle screw) is a feasible minimally invasive treatment for anterior pelvic ring fractures. Higher stability and lower probability of bilateral nerve damage is provided by the extended unilateral INFIX compared to the standard bilateral INFIX.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30925898
doi: 10.1186/s12938-019-0648-z
pii: 10.1186/s12938-019-0648-z
pmc: PMC6441140
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
38Subventions
Organisme : Medizinischen Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
ID : 935
Références
Injury. 2005 May;36(5):599-604
pubmed: 15826617
J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Apr;21(4):269-73
pubmed: 17414555
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2124-31
pubmed: 22219004
J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):269-77
pubmed: 22357081
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2116-23
pubmed: 22492171
J Orthop Surg Res. 2012 Sep 27;7:31
pubmed: 23017093
Injury. 2014 Dec;45 Suppl 6:S9-S15
pubmed: 25457312
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Dec;41(6):665-71
pubmed: 26038006
Int Orthop. 2017 Sep;41(9):1785-1790
pubmed: 28236073
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2017 Jan;5(1):6-12
pubmed: 28246617
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Mar 7;12(1):38
pubmed: 28270223
Injury. 2017 Jun;48(6):1139-1146
pubmed: 28363753
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Jul;137(7):887-893
pubmed: 28439704
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017 Aug;8(Suppl 1):S11-S16
pubmed: 28878532
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):232-240
pubmed: 28951640
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):241-248
pubmed: 28951641
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988 Jan;70(1):1-12
pubmed: 3276697