Calf aversion to hot-iron disbudding.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 03 2019
29 03 2019
Historique:
received:
02
11
2018
accepted:
12
03
2019
entrez:
31
3
2019
pubmed:
31
3
2019
medline:
10
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dairy calves are routinely disbudded by cauterization with a hot iron. To mitigate the intra-operative and initial post-operative pain associated with this procedure some farmers provide calves general and local anesthetics, but it is unknown if the procedure remains aversive. We used a place-conditioning paradigm to assess aversion caused by hot-iron cautery with a local anesthetic compared to a sham procedure. A test area was divided into three equally sized pens: two 'treatment' pens with distinct visual cues were connected by a central 'neutral' pen. Each calf went through the disbudding procedure and a 6-h recovery period in one treatment pen and the control procedure in the other treatment pen. In three tests (48, 72 and 96 h after the second treatment), calves could freely roam among the pens until they chose to lie down, ending the session. Calves spent less time in either of the treatment pens compared to the central pen. When only comparing the two treatment pen, calves spent less time in the disbudding pen, especially during the first test. Calves were also less likely to lie down in the pen associated with the disbudding procedure. We conclude that even with the use of a local anesthetic, hot-iron disbudding is salient and aversive for calves, indicating the need to refine or avoid the procedure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30926934
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41798-7
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-41798-7
pmc: PMC6441027
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5344Références
Prog Neurobiol. 1998 Dec;56(6):613-72
pubmed: 9871940
PLoS One. 2014 May 21;9(5):e98429
pubmed: 24848635
Vet J. 2008 Mar;175(3):293-300
pubmed: 17613265
Eur J Pharmacol. 2013 Sep 15;716(1-3):158-68
pubmed: 23500202
N Z Vet J. 2015 May;63(3):153-7
pubmed: 25371291
Aust Vet J. 2009 Jun;87(6):230-7
pubmed: 19489780
J Anim Sci. 2010 Feb;88(2):802-10
pubmed: 19854991
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 04;9(2):e88030
pubmed: 24505365
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Jun;101(6):5411-5427
pubmed: 29550129
Aust Vet J. 1998 Feb;76(2):118-22
pubmed: 9578782
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1995 Spring;19(1):39-51
pubmed: 7770196
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 21;8(1):9443
pubmed: 29930261
Am J Vet Res. 2008 Jun;69(6):751-62
pubmed: 18518655
Brain Res. 1984 Jul 2;305(1):67-76
pubmed: 6744062
J Dairy Sci. 2007 Sep;90(9):4232-9
pubmed: 17699042
Can Vet J. 2010 Mar;51(3):283-8
pubmed: 20514252
Vet J. 1999 Jul;158(1):14-20
pubmed: 10409412
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2011 Mar 15;238(6):755-67
pubmed: 21401433
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Apr;10(4):283-94
pubmed: 19259101
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Jun 05;5:117
pubmed: 29922684
Nature. 1983 Dec 15-21;306(5944):686-8
pubmed: 6656869
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Nov;94(11):5724-34
pubmed: 22032397
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Feb;92(2):540-7
pubmed: 19164664
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Apr;92(4):1512-9
pubmed: 19307632
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 04;8(12):e80556
pubmed: 24324609
J Anim Sci. 1991 Jun;69(6):2556-62
pubmed: 1885370
Acta Vet Scand. 2008;50 Suppl 1:S1-12
pubmed: 19049678
Br J Anaesth. 2001 Jan;86(1):5-11
pubmed: 11575409
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Jun;93(6):2450-7
pubmed: 20494153
Physiol Behav. 2019 Feb 1;199:47-55
pubmed: 30414886
J Dairy Sci. 2000 Sep;83(9):2037-41
pubmed: 11003236
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Apr;91(4):1686-92
pubmed: 18349262
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2015 Mar;31(1):113-38, vi-vii
pubmed: 25578387
Pain. 1994 Sep;58(3):355-66
pubmed: 7838585
BMC Vet Res. 2012 Apr 30;8:48
pubmed: 22546492
Can Vet J. 2007 Dec;48(12):1249-54
pubmed: 18189045
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Aug;96(8):5194-205
pubmed: 23746590
Pain. 1992 Nov;51(2):199-206
pubmed: 1484716
Aust Vet J. 1986 Nov;63(11):359-61
pubmed: 3548689
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:167-95
pubmed: 17716086