Current Management of pT3b Prostate Cancer After Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy.


Journal

European urology oncology
ISSN: 2588-9311
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101724904

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
received: 28 01 2018
revised: 30 04 2018
accepted: 08 05 2018
entrez: 2 4 2019
pubmed: 2 4 2019
medline: 4 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) in high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) is gaining increasing traction. The optimal use of additional treatments for PCa with seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b) after RALP remains ill explored. To evaluate the management of pT3b PCa after RALP in current clinical practice. As part of the prospective Belgian RALP Consortium project (October 2009-March 2016), 796 patients with pT3b disease were evaluated. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Population and perioperative characteristics were described to assess surgical outcome. Multivariable regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of lymph node invasion (pN1), positive surgical margins (R+), postoperative morbidity, and additional treatments. In this prospective population-based registry, 85% of patients with clinical high-risk locally advanced PCa received pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Early postoperative complications (0-30 d) were observed in 68 patients (8.5%). During oncologic follow-up (median 12 mo), 63% of pN1 patients and 56% of R+ patients received additional therapy. Performing PLND (necessary for assessing pN1 status) was a specific predictor for androgen deprivation therapy only, whereas R+ and younger age were independent predictors for radiotherapy only. Limitations include the nonstandardized policy on additional treatments among hospitals. In current practice, RALP is performed with acceptable morbidity for PCa with seminal vesicle invasion and the use of postoperative additional treatments is influenced by different patient, tumor, and surgical variables. Despite the recommendations, 15-21% of patients do not receive adequate pelvic lymph node staging and adjuvant therapy is given in 38% of patients. Full and correct staging of the real disease extent remains important in the management of these patients. This study on prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion after robot-assisted prostatectomy evaluates the use of additional treatments in current clinical practice. Additional treatments for advanced prostate cancer should be patient-adjusted according to the disease extent.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) in high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) is gaining increasing traction. The optimal use of additional treatments for PCa with seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b) after RALP remains ill explored.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the management of pT3b PCa after RALP in current clinical practice.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
As part of the prospective Belgian RALP Consortium project (October 2009-March 2016), 796 patients with pT3b disease were evaluated.
INTERVENTION
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Population and perioperative characteristics were described to assess surgical outcome. Multivariable regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of lymph node invasion (pN1), positive surgical margins (R+), postoperative morbidity, and additional treatments.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
In this prospective population-based registry, 85% of patients with clinical high-risk locally advanced PCa received pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Early postoperative complications (0-30 d) were observed in 68 patients (8.5%). During oncologic follow-up (median 12 mo), 63% of pN1 patients and 56% of R+ patients received additional therapy. Performing PLND (necessary for assessing pN1 status) was a specific predictor for androgen deprivation therapy only, whereas R+ and younger age were independent predictors for radiotherapy only. Limitations include the nonstandardized policy on additional treatments among hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS
In current practice, RALP is performed with acceptable morbidity for PCa with seminal vesicle invasion and the use of postoperative additional treatments is influenced by different patient, tumor, and surgical variables. Despite the recommendations, 15-21% of patients do not receive adequate pelvic lymph node staging and adjuvant therapy is given in 38% of patients. Full and correct staging of the real disease extent remains important in the management of these patients.
PATIENT SUMMARY
This study on prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion after robot-assisted prostatectomy evaluates the use of additional treatments in current clinical practice. Additional treatments for advanced prostate cancer should be patient-adjusted according to the disease extent.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30929840
pii: S2588-9311(18)30051-8
doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.05.005
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

110-117

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Filip Poelaert (F)

Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: filip.poelaert@uzgent.be.

Steven Joniau (S)

Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Thierry Roumeguère (T)

Department of Urology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.

Filip Ameye (F)

Department of Urology, AZ Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium.

Greet De Coster (G)

Belgian Cancer Registry Foundation, Brussels, Belgium.

Peter Dekuyper (P)

Department of Urology, AZ Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium.

Thierry Quackels (T)

Department of Urology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.

Ben Van Cleynenbreugel (B)

Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Nancy Van Damme (N)

Belgian Cancer Registry Foundation, Brussels, Belgium.

Elizabeth Van Eycken (E)

Belgian Cancer Registry Foundation, Brussels, Belgium.

Alexander Mottrie (A)

Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.

Nicolaas Lumen (N)

Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH